Literature DB >> 25764353

Effectiveness of chlorine dispensers in emergencies: case study results from Haiti, Sierra Leone, Democratic Republic of Congo, and Senegal.

Travis M Yates1,2, Elise Armitage1, Lilian V Lehmann1, Ariel J Branz2, Daniele S Lantagne1,2,3.   

Abstract

Dispensers are a source-based water quality intervention with promising uptake results in development contexts. Dispenser programs include a tank of chlorine with a dosing valve that is installed next to a water source, a local Promoter who conducts community education and refills the Dispenser, and chlorine refills. In collaboration with response organizations, we assessed the effectiveness of Dispensers in four emergency situations. In the three initial and four sustained response phase evaluations, 70 Dispenser sites were visited, 2057 household surveys were conducted, and 1676 water samples were analyzed. Across the evaluations, reported Dispenser use ranged from 9 to 97%, confirmed Dispenser use (as measured by free chlorine residual) ranged from 5 to 87%, and effective use (as measured by improvement in household water quality to meet international standards) ranged from 0 to 81%. More effective Dispenser interventions installed Dispensers at point-sources, maintained a high-quality chlorine solution manufacturing and distribution chain, maintained Dispenser hardware, integrated Dispensers projects within larger water programs, remunerated Promoters, had experienced project staff, worked with local partners to implement the project, conducted ongoing monitoring, and had a project sustainability plan. Our results indicate that Dispensers can be, but are not always, an appropriate strategy to reduce the risk of waterborne diseases in emergencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25764353     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  3 in total

Review 1.  Passive In-Line Chlorination for Drinking Water Disinfection: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Megan Lindmark; Katya Cherukumilli; Yoshika S Crider; Perrine Marcenac; Matthew Lozier; Lee Voth-Gaeddert; Daniele S Lantagne; James R Mihelcic; Qianjin Marina Zhang; Craig Just; Amy J Pickering
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 11.357

2.  Lessons learned from conducting six multi-country mixed-methods effectiveness research studies on water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions in humanitarian response.

Authors:  Daniele Lantagne; Lilian Lehmann; Travis Yates; Karin Gallandat; Mustafa Sikder; Marta Domini; Gabrielle String
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  A mixed methods study to evaluate participatory mapping for rural water safety planning in western Kenya.

Authors:  Joseph Okotto-Okotto; Weiyu Yu; Emmah Kwoba; Samuel M Thumbi; Lorna Grace Okotto; Peggy Wanza; Diogo Trajano Gomes da Silva; Jim Wright
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.