Literature DB >> 25763572

Investigation of intra-esophageal air kinetics and esophageal sphincters in patients with total laryngectomy during esophageal speech.

Aykut Bozan1, Rukiye Vardar, Serdar Akyildiz, Tayfun Kirazli, Fatih Ogut, Esra Yildirim, Serhat Bor.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the air kinetics of well- and poor-speaking patients and their upper (UES) and lower (LES) esophageal sphincter pressures . The esophageal speech capability of 23 total laryngectomy patients was assessed with the Wepman scale. LES and UES points and pressures were measured, and air kinetics were compared. All patients were male, with an average age of 58 years. Both the LES and UES pressures were not statistically different between good-speaking and poor-speaking patients (p > 0.05). The ability to speak was estimated only by looking at tracings. Good speakers are able to retain air successfully and on a long-term basis between the upper and lower esophageal sphincters. During short and/or rapid speech, these patients are able to rapidly suck and then expel the air from their upper esophagus. During long speeches, after sucking the air into their distal esophagus, they used the air in the upper part of the esophagus during the speech, only later seeming to fill the lower esophagus with the air as a possible reserve in the stomach. It has been shown that the basic requirement for speaking is the capacity to suck and store the air within the esophagus. For successful speech, the air should be stored inside the esophagus. MII technology contributes to our understanding of speech kinetics and occupies an important place in patient training as a biofeedback technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25763572     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-015-3600-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  17 in total

1.  [Current remarks for use of the TNM classification on head and neck (author's transl)].

Authors:  W Schwab
Journal:  Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg)       Date:  1975-01

2.  Use of a portable manometer as a screening procedure in voice rehabilitation.

Authors:  D W Morgan; J Hadley; G Willis; A D Cheesman
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.469

Review 3.  The treatment of hypertonicity of the pharyngo-oesophageal segment after laryngectomy.

Authors:  H A Brok; R J Stroeve; M P Copper; P F Schouwenburg
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1998-08

4.  Esophageal determinants of alaryngeal speech.

Authors:  C S Winans; E J Reichbach; W F Waldrop
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1974-01

5.  A new questionnaire for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  G R Locke; N J Talley; A L Weaver; A R Zinsmeister
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  Complications of pharyngeal myotomy for alaryngeal voice rehabilitation.

Authors:  P M Scott; N R Bleach; A R Perry; A D Cheesman
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.469

7.  Current status of laryngectomee rehabilitation: I. Results of therapy.

Authors:  G A Gates; W Ryan; J C Cooper; G F Lawlis; E Cantu; T Hayashi; E Lauder; R W Welch; E Hearne
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  1982 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.808

8.  Selective myotomy for voice restoration after total laryngectomy.

Authors:  M I Singer; E D Blom
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1981-11

Review 9.  Diagnostic work-up of GERD.

Authors:  Marcelo F Vela
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2014-07-30

10.  Rehabilitation after total laryngectomy; successful oesophageal speech.

Authors:  T O HOWIE
Journal:  Glasgow Med J       Date:  1946-02
View more
  1 in total

1.  Quality of life among total laryngectomized patients undergoing speech rehabilitation: correlation between several instruments.

Authors:  Ana Carolina Soares Raquel; Elaine Pires Buzaneli; Hevely Saray Lima Silveira; Marcia Simões-Zenari; Marco Aurélio Valmondes Kulcsar; Luiz Paulo Kowalski; Kátia Nemr
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 2.365

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.