Literature DB >> 25763492

Arabidopsis dual resistance proteins, both RPS4 and RRS1, are required for resistance to bacterial wilt in transgenic Brassica crops.

Mari Narusaka1, Katsunori Hatakeyama, Ken Shirasu, Yoshihiro Narusaka.   

Abstract

Bacterial wilt phytopathogen Ralstonia solanacearum is a serious soil-borne disease that attacks several economically important plants worldwide, including Brassicaceae. Previous studies indicate that recognition of avirulence (Avr)-effector PopP2 by resistance (R) protein, RRS1-R, and physical interaction between RRS1-R and PopP2 in the nucleus are required for resistance. Of late, we showed that a pair of Arabidopsis thaliana TIR-NLR proteins, RRS1 and RPS4, function together in disease resistance against multiple pathogen isolates. Here, we report that dual R proteins, RRS1 and RPS4, from A. thaliana ecotype Wassilewskija confer resistance to bacterial wilt in transgenic Brassica crops. For practical applications, this finding may provide a new strategy for developing disease resistant plants that express R genes from other plants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brassicaceae; R gene; RPS4; RRS1; Ralstonia solanacearum

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25763492      PMCID: PMC4203570          DOI: 10.4161/psb.29130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Signal Behav        ISSN: 1559-2316


Plant diseases cause serious agricultural losses worldwide. Breeding disease resistant crops help increase the world food supply. Among the various plant disease control strategies, the introgression of disease resistance (R) genes has been used in traditional plant breeding for decades. R proteins mostly carry a C-terminal leucine-rich repeats and a central the nucleotide-binding adaptor shared by Apaf-1, Resistance proteins, and CED-4 domain (NLR). R proteins detect avirulence (Avr) proteins secreted by the pathogen and confer resistance to various pathogens. In addition, the hypersensitive reaction mediated by the R protein is the most powerful defense system in plants. Therefore, cloning of R genes from a variety of crops or their wild relatives and transferring them into susceptible cultivars is being attempted. However, the transfer of NLR type R genes into crops is limited because the R genes often fail to function, i.e., either no responses or inappropriate auto-immune responses are obtained, when they are transferred between different plant families or even between related species in the same family. For example, a single NLR-type R protein, Mi-1.2, in tomato confers resistance to the following 3 different pathogens: root-knot nematodes, potato aphid, and sweet potato whitefly. Goggin et al. indicated that Mi-1.2-mediated resistance could not completely function in a heterologous background. Therefore, this suggests that the signaling components in NLR-type R protein-mediated defense system are highly conserved in family or genus. Of late, it was reported that some pairs of R genes, such as RPP2A/RPP2B, N/NRG1, RPM1/TAO1, Pikm1-TS/Pikm2-TS, Lr10/RGA2, and Pi5–1/Pi5–2,- may function in concert. Previously, we also demonstrated that a pair of Toll/interleukin-1 receptor (TIR)-NLR genes, RRS1 and RPS4, localize in Arabidopsis thaliana accession Wassilewskija Chromosome V (Fig. 1), and function together in disease resistance against 3 different pathogens: anthracnose (Colletotrichum higginsianum), bacterial speck (Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato strain DC3000 expressing avrRps4), and bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum)., Thus, both R proteins, RRS1 and RPS4, are required for effector-triggered immunity in A. thaliana.

Figure 1. Construction of the R gene plasmid. RPS4 and RRS1 genes are arranged in a head-to-head configuration in Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Wassilewskija (Ws-0) chromosome V. The genomic fragments containing RPS4 or RRS1 were amplified from Ws-0 genomic DNA using PCR. (A) The 6.3 kbp genomic RPS4 fragment, including approximately 2.1 kbp upstream and 109 bp downstream regions, was cloned into pBI101-SK+. (B) The 8.2 kbp genomic RRS1 fragment, including approximately 1.8 kbp upstream and 176 bp downstream regions, was subcloned into the destination vector pGWB1 using the LR cloning reaction.Brassica rapa var. perviridis (Japanese Mustard Spinach, Komatsuna cv. Osome, Takii and Co. Ltd, Kyoto, Japan) was transformed by inoculating hypocotyl sections with Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Rhizobium radiobactor) strain EHA101, harboring the binary vector with the fragments, i.e., both (A) and (B) (RPS4 + RRS1), either (A) (RPS4) or (B) (RRS1) alone, as described above.

Figure 1. Construction of the R gene plasmid. RPS4 and RRS1 genes are arranged in a head-to-head configuration in Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Wassilewskija (Ws-0) chromosome V. The genomic fragments containing RPS4 or RRS1 were amplified from Ws-0 genomic DNA using PCR. (A) The 6.3 kbp genomic RPS4 fragment, including approximately 2.1 kbp upstream and 109 bp downstream regions, was cloned into pBI101-SK+. (B) The 8.2 kbp genomic RRS1 fragment, including approximately 1.8 kbp upstream and 176 bp downstream regions, was subcloned into the destination vector pGWB1 using the LR cloning reaction.Brassica rapa var. perviridis (Japanese Mustard Spinach, Komatsuna cv. Osome, Takii and Co. Ltd, Kyoto, Japan) was transformed by inoculating hypocotyl sections with Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Rhizobium radiobactor) strain EHA101, harboring the binary vector with the fragments, i.e., both (A) and (B) (RPS4 + RRS1), either (A) (RPS4) or (B) (RRS1) alone, as described above. The bacterial wilt caused by R. solanacearum is an serious soilborne disease affecting important agricultural crops. R. solanacearum infects more than 200 plant species belonging to 50 plant families, including Brassicaceae., Previous studies have shown that RRS1-R in A. thaliana accession Nd-1 recognized Avr-protein secreted by R. solanacearum and conferred resistance to the pathogen., Linden et al. suggested that RRS1, but not RPS4, in A. thaliana Kil-0 is the key factor of a tolerant phenotype against R. solanacearum BCCF402. However, the bacterial wilt resistance mechanism is poorly understood at the molecular level. The primary aim of present study was to clarify whether a pair of NLR-type R proteins, RRS1 and RPS4, from A. thaliana confer resistance to bacterial wilt in a heterologous background, i.e., Brassica crops, to facilitate molecular breeding using the Arabidopsis dual R gene. Therefore, we transferred genomic fragments of Arabidopsis RRS1 and RPS4 under the control of their native promoters into Brassica rapa plants, which belong to the same family (Brassicaceae). Furthermore, we also determined whether both RRS1 and RPS4 are essentially required for resistance to bacterial wilt in Brassica crops, i.e., Brassica rapa. To determine whether Arabidopsis RRS1 and RPS4 function as a pair in Brassicaceae plants other than A. thaliana, we transformed Arabidopsis RRS1 and RPS4 genes into Brassica rapa var. perviridis (Japanese Mustard Spinach, Komatsuna). The transgenes, RRS1 and RPS4, were then segregated in a 1:1 ratio in the T3 generation. We also generated B. rapa transformants that expressed only RRS1 or RPS4 genes. Under the normal condition, these transformants grew normally and did not constitutively induce the expression of defense-related marker gene Br-PR1. This suggests that a inappropriate auto-immune responses was not induced by transformation with both RRS1 and RPS4 genes (Fig. 2).

Figure 2. Growth and expression of defense-related genes (Br-PR1) in transgenic Brassica rapa plants under normal growth condition. (A) Each image shows 25-d-old T3 transgenic B. rapa that carried both RPS4 and RRS1 (R + R), RPS4 alone, RRS1 alone, and wild type control plants (WT). (B) Five leaf disks were cut from the leaves of WT and transgenic B. rapa plants, and total RNA was isolated for qRT-PCR analysis. Expression level of Br-CBP20 in B. rapa was used for normalization.Br-PR1 expression is shown relative values. Bars indicate SE. The data indicate no significant differences compared with the wild type controls (Dunnett’s method, P < 0.05). The experiment was repeated twice with similar results.

Figure 2. Growth and expression of defense-related genes (Br-PR1) in transgenic Brassica rapa plants under normal growth condition. (A) Each image shows 25-d-old T3 transgenic B. rapa that carried both RPS4 and RRS1 (R + R), RPS4 alone, RRS1 alone, and wild type control plants (WT). (B) Five leaf disks were cut from the leaves of WT and transgenic B. rapa plants, and total RNA was isolated for qRT-PCR analysis. Expression level of Br-CBP20 in B. rapa was used for normalization.Br-PR1 expression is shown relative values. Bars indicate SE. The data indicate no significant differences compared with the wild type controls (Dunnett’s method, P < 0.05). The experiment was repeated twice with similar results. To analyze whether RRS1 and RPS4 could provide resistance to R. solanacearum strain 1002 (Rs1002), which produces the PopP2 effector that can be recognized by RRS1, we performed a root inoculation assay with the pathogen. Wilting was observed 3 to 4 d after the inoculation (dai) in the wild type (WT), followed by complete wilting within 7 to 10 dai (Fig. 3A). In contrast, the transgenic B. rapa plants that expressed RRS1 and RPS4 were healthy after inoculation with the pathogen. The bacterial growth in the WT was approximately 10-fold higher than that in the dual R gene-transformed plants (Fig. 3B). To assess whether RRS1 and RPS4 function in concert, the B. rapa transformants that expressed only RRS1 or RPS4 were inoculated with Rs1002. As shown in Figure 3B, there are no significant difference in bacterial growth between the WT and the single R gene transformants. Therefore, these results show that both RRS1 and RPS4 are required for resistance to Rs1002 and function cooperatively. Rs1002 contains an Avr-gene popP2, which belongs to a YopJ-like family of effectors. To determine whether PopP2 plays an important role in the interaction with RRS1, we used an Rs1002-ΔpopP2 where popP2 homolog was disrupted. On the root inoculation assay with Rs1002-ΔpopP2, the level of susceptibility in the dual R gene transformed plants was similar to that in the WT (Fig. 3C). These results indicate that PopP2 specifically elicits RRS1/RPS4-mediated resistance in the dual R gene-transformed B. rapa plants.

Figure 3.Ralstonia solanacearum resistance analysis in RPS4 and RRS1 dual R gene-transformed Brassica rapa. R. solanacearum strains 1002 (Rs1002) and 1002-ΔpopP2 (Rs1002-ΔpopP2) were described previously., T3 transgenic B. rapa lines that carried both RPS4 and RRS1 (R + R), either RPS4 or RRS1 alone, and wild type control plants (WT) were tested. B. rapa plants were grown in rock wool for 17 d (12 h light cycle) at 22 °C. Root inoculations were performed by cutting approximately 2 cm from the bottom of the rock wool, and the exposed roots of the plants were immersed in a bacterial suspension at a concentration of 5 × 108 colony-forming units (cfu) ml−1 for 24 h. The plants were then transferred to a growth chamber at 25 °C (12 h light cycle). (A) Infection phenotypes of plants inoculated with Rs1002. Images were taken 4 d after inoculation. Each image shows a representative example from 3 independent experiments. Quantification of Rs1002 (B) and Rs1002-ΔpopP2 (C) in planta was performed using qRT-PCR, as described by Narusaka et al. Inoculated plants were harvested at 4 dpi and total RNA was isolated. qRT-PCR data for R. solanacearum rpoD (Rs-rpoD) and Br-CBP20 expression from B. rapa were obtained from a standard curve of cycle times as a function of copy number. Abundance of Rs-rpoD was normalized with Br-CBP20 in infected samples., Bars indicate standard error (SE). Asterisks indicate significant differences compared with the wild type controls (Dunnett’s method, P < 0.05). This experiment was repeated at least twice with similar results.

Figure 3.Ralstonia solanacearum resistance analysis in RPS4 and RRS1 dual R gene-transformed Brassica rapa. R. solanacearum strains 1002 (Rs1002) and 1002-ΔpopP2 (Rs1002-ΔpopP2) were described previously., T3 transgenic B. rapa lines that carried both RPS4 and RRS1 (R + R), either RPS4 or RRS1 alone, and wild type control plants (WT) were tested. B. rapa plants were grown in rock wool for 17 d (12 h light cycle) at 22 °C. Root inoculations were performed by cutting approximately 2 cm from the bottom of the rock wool, and the exposed roots of the plants were immersed in a bacterial suspension at a concentration of 5 × 108 colony-forming units (cfu) ml−1 for 24 h. The plants were then transferred to a growth chamber at 25 °C (12 h light cycle). (A) Infection phenotypes of plants inoculated with Rs1002. Images were taken 4 d after inoculation. Each image shows a representative example from 3 independent experiments. Quantification of Rs1002 (B) and Rs1002-ΔpopP2 (C) in planta was performed using qRT-PCR, as described by Narusaka et al. Inoculated plants were harvested at 4 dpi and total RNA was isolated. qRT-PCR data for R. solanacearum rpoD (Rs-rpoD) and Br-CBP20 expression from B. rapa were obtained from a standard curve of cycle times as a function of copy number. Abundance of Rs-rpoD was normalized with Br-CBP20 in infected samples., Bars indicate standard error (SE). Asterisks indicate significant differences compared with the wild type controls (Dunnett’s method, P < 0.05). This experiment was repeated at least twice with similar results. In plant biology, A. thaliana is the most popular and important model species in the Brassicaceae (mustards or crucifers) family. A. thaliana is an excellent tool for the research into genetics, molecular basis of disease resistance, and molecular breeding of Brassica crops. A. thaliana is also an important model plant for the investigation of plant immune systems. The reference Arabidopsis accession Col-0 genome sequence has been used to generate a list of defense-related genes against pathogens and subsequently identified 149 NB-LRR-type R genes. If these R genes can function in a heterologous background, they will be useful for breeding disease resistant plants. Despite the discovery of R genes against Brassica crop pathogens, the direct use of Arabidopsis R genes has not progressed in other Brassicaceae plants.- The present study showed that the NLR type R proteins, RRS1 and RPS4, from A. thaliana functioned as a pair in another Brassicaceae species. According to the guard hypothesis, the dual R protein pair, RRS1 and RPS4, may function as a guard–guardee pair where the R protein can interact with signaling components downstream of R protein in a heterologous background. If the functional expression of the R gene pair is required for R gene-mediated resistance in a heterologous background, each partner of the previously reported R genes will soon be discovered and R genes could be exploited in molecular breeding to enhance resistance to crop diseases. This suggests that all the necessary components of R gene-mediated signaling must be highly conserved among plant species. This solution will increase the range of potential resistance resources. For practical applications, this novel finding will provide strategies for development of disease-resistant transgenic plants and novel approaches for plant genome manipulation.
  26 in total

1.  Broad-spectrum mildew resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana mediated by RPW8.

Authors:  S Xiao; S Ellwood; O Calis; E Patrick; T Li; M Coleman; J G Turner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-01-05       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Broad-spectrum defense against plant pathogens.

Authors:  Alexandre Brutus; Sheng Yang He
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Transgressive segregation reveals two Arabidopsis TIR-NB-LRR resistance genes effective against Leptosphaeria maculans, causal agent of blackleg disease.

Authors:  Jens Staal; Maria Kaliff; Svante Bohman; Christina Dixelius
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.417

Review 4.  NB-LRR proteins: pairs, pieces, perception, partners, and pathways.

Authors:  Timothy K Eitas; Jeffery L Dangl
Journal:  Curr Opin Plant Biol       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 7.834

5.  Gene-for-gene tolerance to bacterial wilt in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Liesl Van der Linden; Jane Bredenkamp; Sanushka Naidoo; Joanne Fouché-Weich; Katherine J Denby; Stephane Genin; Yves Marco; Dave K Berger
Journal:  Mol Plant Microbe Interact       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.171

Review 6.  Arabidopsis and the plant immune system.

Authors:  Marc T Nishimura; Jeffery L Dangl
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 6.417

7.  Heterologous expression of the Mi-1.2 gene from tomato confers resistance against nematodes but not aphids in eggplant.

Authors:  Fiona L Goggin; Lingling Jia; Gowri Shah; Stephanie Hebert; Valerie M Williamson; Diane E Ullman
Journal:  Mol Plant Microbe Interact       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.171

8.  Physical interaction between RRS1-R, a protein conferring resistance to bacterial wilt, and PopP2, a type III effector targeted to the plant nucleus.

Authors:  Laurent Deslandes; Jocelyne Olivier; Nemo Peeters; Dong Xin Feng; Manirath Khounlotham; Christian Boucher; Imre Somssich; Stephane Genin; Yves Marco
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-06-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Arabidopsis TAO1 is a TIR-NB-LRR protein that contributes to disease resistance induced by the Pseudomonas syringae effector AvrB.

Authors:  Timothy K Eitas; Zachary L Nimchuk; Jeffery L Dangl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  A dual resistance gene system prevents infection by three distinct pathogens.

Authors:  Mari Narusaka; Yasuyuki Kubo; Tomonori Shiraishi; Masaki Iwabuchi; Yoshihiro Narusaka
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2009-10-17
View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Improving crop disease resistance: lessons from research on Arabidopsis and tomato.

Authors:  Sophie J M Piquerez; Sarah E Harvey; Jim L Beynon; Vardis Ntoukakis
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 5.753

2.  Leucine zipper motif in RRS1 is crucial for the regulation of Arabidopsis dual resistance protein complex RPS4/RRS1.

Authors:  Mari Narusaka; Kazuhiro Toyoda; Tomonori Shiraishi; Satoshi Iuchi; Yoshitaka Takano; Ken Shirasu; Yoshihiro Narusaka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Analyses of natural variation indicates that the absence of RPS4/RRS1 and amino acid change in RPS4 cause loss of their functions and resistance to pathogens.

Authors:  Mari Narusaka; Satoshi Iuchi; Yoshihiro Narusaka
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2017-03-04

4.  Protein-protein interactions in the RPS4/RRS1 immune receptor complex.

Authors:  Sung Un Huh; Volkan Cevik; Pingtao Ding; Zane Duxbury; Yan Ma; Laurence Tomlinson; Panagiotis F Sarris; Jonathan D G Jones
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 6.823

5.  Perception of structurally distinct effectors by the integrated WRKY domain of a plant immune receptor.

Authors:  Nitika Mukhi; Hannah Brown; Danylo Gorenkin; Pingtao Ding; Adam R Bentham; Clare E M Stevenson; Jonathan D G Jones; Mark J Banfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Show me your ID: NLR immune receptors with integrated domains in plants.

Authors:  Clemence Marchal; Vassiliki A Michalopoulou; Zhou Zou; Volkan Cevik; Panagiotis F Sarris
Journal:  Essays Biochem       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 7.258

7.  QTL identification, fine mapping, and marker development for breeding peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) resistant to bacterial wilt.

Authors:  Feiyan Qi; Ziqi Sun; Hua Liu; Zheng Zheng; Li Qin; Lei Shi; Qingzheng Chen; Haidong Liu; Xiufang Lin; Lijuan Miao; Mengdi Tian; Xiao Wang; Bingyan Huang; Wenzhao Dong; Xinyou Zhang
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 5.574

8.  RRS1 gene expression involved in the progression of papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  Feng Chen; Yaqiong Jin; Lin Feng; Jie Zhang; Jun Tai; Jin Shi; Yongbo Yu; Jie Lu; Shengcai Wang; Xin Li; Ping Chu; Shujing Han; Shujun Cheng; Yongli Guo; Xin Ni
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 5.722

9.  Simultaneous RNAi Knockdown of Three FMRFamide-Like Peptide Genes, Mi-flp1, Mi-flp12, and Mi-flp18 Provides Resistance to Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita.

Authors:  Prakash Banakar; Alkesh Hada; Pradeep K Papolu; Uma Rao
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 5.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.