| Literature DB >> 25763351 |
Konstantinos Ninos1, Spiros Kostopoulos2, Ioannis Kalatzis2, Panagiota Ravazoula3, George Sakelaropoulos4, George Panayiotakis4, George Economou1, Dionisis Cavouras2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: P63 immunostaining has been considered as potential prognostic factor in laryngeal cancer. Considering that P63 is mainly nuclear stain, a possible correlation between the texture of P63-stained nuclei and the tumor's grade could be of value to diagnosis, since this may be related to biologic information imprinted as texture on P63 expressed nuclei.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25763351 PMCID: PMC4334023 DOI: 10.1155/2014/963076
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anal Cell Pathol (Amst) ISSN: 2210-7177 Impact factor: 2.916
Site, stage, and grade distribution of laryngeal tumor lesions.
| High differentiation | Moderate differentiation | Low differentiation | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | 18 | 16 | 55 | ||
|
| |||||
| Lesion site | Glotic | 17 | 11 | 7 | 35 |
| Supraglotic | 3 | 3 | 5 | 11 | |
| Spread | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| N/A | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | |
| Stage | T2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 |
| T3 | 13 | 9 | 7 | 29 | |
| T4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 13 | |
| N0 | 18 | 12 | 13 | 5 | |
| N1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 43 | |
| N2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 2 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| II | 3 | 3 | 1 | 7 | |
| III | 12 | 7 | 8 | 27 | |
| IV | 5 | 6 | 5 | 16 | |
Figure 1(a) Digitized frame from P63 stained specimen and (b) P63 expressed nuclei.
Figure 2Box plots and correlation plots of the Long Run Emphasis ((a) and (b)) and Run Percentage ((c) and (d)) features, respectively, sustaining statistically significant differences (P < 0.01) between the three laryngeal grades.
Figure 3Box plots of features sustaining statistically significant differences between low and high grade classes. (a) Run length emphasis, (b) run percentage, (c) contrast, (d) inverse difference moment, (e) difference variance, (f) difference entropy, (g) run length nonuniformity, (h) solidity, (i) mean value, (j) Tamura histogram feature, (k) edge statistics feature, and (l) percentage of positively expressed nuclei.
Means, standard deviations, statistical significance, and correlations of features with statistically significant differences between High Grade and Low Grade laryngeal tumor lesions.
| LG-class | HG-class | LG versus HG | LG versus HG | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mv | std | mv | std | Statistical significance | Correlation | |
| % P63 | 84.840 | 3.251 | 79.833 | 9.565 | 0.02 | −0.300 |
| MVa | 5.170 | 0.260 | 5.010 | 0.211 | 0.03 | −0.322 |
| CONTa | 0.216 | 0.024 | 0.238 | 0.02 | 0.002 | 0.436 |
| IDFa | 0.893 | 0.012 | 0.883 | 0.009 | 0.003 | −0.434 |
| DVARa | 0.168 | 0.014 | 0.179 | 0.010 | 0.003 | 0.434 |
| DENTRa | 0.515 | 0.033 | 0.542 | 0.023 | 0.003 | 0.434 |
| LREa | 39.475 | 9.026 | 32.351 | 6.122 | 0.004 | −0.428 |
| RLNUa | 0.057 | 0.008 | 0.064 | 0.009 | 0.009 | 0.354 |
| RPa | 0.240 | 0.022 | 0.261 | 0.019 | 0.002 | 0.447 |
| Solidity | 0.945 | 0.008 | 0.940 | 0.005 | 0.007 | −0.332 |
| TamuraH | 70.751 | 7.601 | 65.974 | 7.021 | 0.040 | −0.307 |
| EdgeSt | 32.205 | 5.939 | 28.356 | 4.245 | 0.016 | −0.356 |
% P63: percentage of P63 expressed nuclei, MV: mean value, CONT: Contrast, IDF: Inverse Difference Moment, DVAR: Difference Variance, DENTR: Difference Entropy, LRE: Long Runs Emphasis, RLNU: Run Length Nonuniformity, RP: Run Percentage, TamuraH: Tamura histogram feature, EdgeSt: edge statistics feature, mv: mean value, and std: standard deviation, a: average of the feature over four directions (0°, 45°, 90°, and 135°).
Contingency table of predicting the grade of laryngeal squamous cell carcinomas by the nonlinear logistic regression equation.
| LG+ | LG− | HG+ | HG− | % overall accuracy | Cohen-Kappa | AUC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 | 5 | 31 | 3 | 85.5 | 0.654 | 0.87 |
LG+ and LG− refer to low grade (grade I) of correctly and incorrectly predicted carcinomas and HG+ and HG− refer to correctly and incorrectly predicted high grade (grade II + grade III) carcinomas, respectively. AUC: area under the curve; overall prediction accuracy was estimated by the LOO cross validation method.
Figure 4ROC curve: using best features combination in the logistic regression equation and the LOO cross-validation method, highest prediction accuracy was achieved (AUC = 0.87, features involved: %P63 expressed nuclei, Angular Second Moment, Correlation, Inverse Difference Moment, Sum Entropy, Solidity, and Radial Distance range). a: average and r: range of the feature over four directions (0°, 45°, 90°, and 135°).