Literature DB >> 25763200

Corticosteroid in the treatment of moderate to severe thrombocytopenia due to leptospirosis.

Shahriar Alian1, Hasan Asghari2, Narges Najafi1, Alireza Davoudi1, Jamshid Yazdani3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Thrombocytopenia is associated with a bad prognosis in Leptospirosis.
OBJECTIVES: We investigated the effect of corticosteroids to improve thrombocytopenia due to leptospirosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a clinical trial, all patients admitted with leptospirosis in Razi Hospital of Ghaemshahr, north of Iran were enrolled in a 2-year study. Totally, 56 patients with moderate to severe thrombocytopenia were randomized to control and treatment groups. The treatment group received corticosteroid (prednisolone 1 mg/kg/day for maximum one week) in addition to the standard antibiotic therapy.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference regarding age and gender between the two groups (P = 0.254, P = 0.789, respectively). The mean duration to improve thrombocytopenia was 4.41 ± 0.197 days in the treatment group and 5.72 ± 0.318 days in the control group, which was significantly different (P = 0.003). Duration of hospitalization in the treatment group was 5.24 ± 0.244 days and 6.23 ± 0.329 days in the control group, which was significantly different (P = 0.028). The two groups had no significant difference regarding mortality, intubation, level of platelet, duration of ICU admission and pulmonary, renal or hepatic involvement.
CONCLUSIONS: Corticosteroid therapy decreased the length of hospitalization only in severe subgroup thrombocytopenia, but not in the moderate subgroup.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corticosteroids; Leptospirosis; Thrombocytopenia

Year:  2014        PMID: 25763200      PMCID: PMC4329749          DOI: 10.5812/ircmj.16030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J        ISSN: 2074-1804            Impact factor:   0.611


1. Background

Leptospirosis is a zoonotic infection in humans and animals caused by Leptospira species of the spirochete family (1). There are two stages in the disease process. The first phase occurs during the active leptospira infection named as bacteriemic or septicemic phase. In this phase, flu-like symptoms (including fever, severe headache, myalgia, chills, nausea and vomiting, conjunctival suffusion, abdominal pain, anorexia, coughing and sore throat) occur for more than 5-7 days. The second phase, immunologic, occurs immediately after the bacteriemic phase or 1-3 days after asymptomatic period. Patient's symptoms vary in this phase. Many patients have mild fever, headache, vomiting and rash. Aseptic meningitis is most common in the second phase. Ten percent of patients with leptospirosis are affected by a severe form of disease or Weil's syndrome (with a mortality rate of 5-40%) (2). Common symptoms of this syndrome are due to liver, kidney and blood vessels involvement. Symptoms of this severe disease occur after 3 to 7 days and include persistent jaundice, decreased urine output, anemia, rash, hypotension, shock, changes in consciousness, skin and mucosal hemorrhagic lesions and pulmonary hemorrhage (1-6). On entering the body, there is widespread hematogenous dissemination and penetration of tissue barriers, including invasion to the central nervous system and aqueous humor of the eye. Transendothelial migration of spirochetes is facilitated by a systemic vasculitis, accounting for a broad spectrum of clinical illness (2, 7). Severe vascular injury can be developed, leading to pulmonary hemorrhage, ischemia of the renal cortex and tubular-epithelial cell necrosis, and destruction of the hepatic architecture, resulting in jaundice and liver cell injury, with or without necrosis (2, 8-11). Immune-mediated mechanisms have been postulated to affect the severity of symptoms and immune mechanisms, including circulating immune complexes, anticardiolipin antibodies, and antiplatelet antibodies, but their significance has not been proven yet (2). Old age, pneumonia, renal failure, and thrombocytopenia are associated with a bad prognosis (1). Thrombocytopenia occurs in the absence of disseminated intravascular coagulation and may accompany progressive renal dysfunction (2).

2. Objectives

In this study, we investigated the role of corticosteroids to improve thrombocytopenia due to leptospirosis.

3. Patients and Methods

This study was a randomized double-blind clinical trial. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences (Code No: 9186, Date: December 19, 2012). The sample size in each group was calculated based on previous studies including that performed by Villanueva et al. (12). The sample size was calculated as 22 based on the following formula, but we enrolled 56 patients. n = (2 × (Z µ µ α = 0.05, β = 0.2, σ. Totally, 187 patients were admitted as leptospirosis based on clinical and epidemiologic criteria in Razi Hospital of Ghaemshahr, north of Iran from August 2011 to September 2013 (two years) (serology tests had not positive results in all cases, those patients diagnosed clinically with false negative serology results were excluded). Razi Hospital is a governmental and teaching hospital with 200 beds. Infectious disease ward is a referral ward in Mazandaran province. Thrombocytopenia was classified to mild (PLT < 150000), moderate (PLT < 100000) and severe (PLT < 50000). Platelet count had normal findings in 17 patients and 98 cases had mild thrombocytopenia and thus excluded. The remaining 72 patients with moderate to severe thrombocytopenia were enrolled. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomized to control and treatment groups. We applied simple randomization method. The treatment group received corticosteroid (prednisolone 1 mg/kg/day) in addition to antibiotic therapy (ceftriaxone 1 g/Iv/daily) until improvement of thrombocytopenia or for a maximum one-week and the control group received the same dosage of antibiotics, but received placebo instead of corticosteroid during this period. Exclusion criteria were patients with negative MAT or those with any health-threatening complications caused by corticosteroid or patients who had previous intake of steroids or other antibiotics two weeks or less prior to the diagnosis of disease and patients whom their clinician did not administered steroids due to some compelling factors like hypersensitivity to steroids, and finally those who were not willing to participate. Sixteen patients due to absence of serologic evidence (MAT had negative results) were excluded and the final analysis was performed on 56 patients in two divided groups. Statistical analysis was performed by independent T-test, Chi-Square, Kaplan-Meier, Log Rank and Breslau using SPSS software (version 13). To confirm the diagnosis of leptospirosis by MAT, 10mL blood sample of each patient was obtained. Serum was separated immediately and poured into a sterile polypropylene tube and sent to the Reference Laboratory of Hisarak while maintaining the cold chain. Patients were visited daily and monitored closely. Laboratory changes in patients, including platelet count were check daily. Patients were followed up until discharge (Tables 1 and 2).
Table 1.

Patients Characteristics

CharacteristicsNo.
Suspected Patients 187
Thrombocytopenia
Negative17
Positive170
Severity of Thrombocytopenia
Mild98
Moderate & severe72
Serology
Negative16
Positive56
Groups
Case28
Control28
Table 2.

Distribution of Patients in Moderate and Severe Subgroups

ThrombocytopeniaCaseControlTotal
Moderate 151934
Sever 13922
Total 282856

4. Results

Patients’ age in the two groups (cases and controls) was compared using independent T-test, which had no significant difference (P = 0.254). The average age in case group was 49.75 ± 8.45 and 46.68 ± 11.26 years in the control group. Gender was assessed using Chi-Square test, which revealed no statistical difference between the two groups (P = 0.789). Treatment group included 14 females and 14 males and control group 13 females and 15 males. Time needed for the improvement of thrombocytopenia was evaluated in the two groups using Kaplan-Meier and Log Rank Test. The treatment group required a mean duration of 4.41 ± 0.197 days and the control group 5.72 ± 0.318 days. The treatment group had a median of 4 ± 0.215 days and the control group 5 ± 0.255 days (Log Rank was 8.625), which was statistically significant (P = 0.003) (degree of freedom (DF) = 1) (Figure 1 and Table 3).
Figure 1.

Survival Function Regarding Required Duration for the Improvement of Thrombocytopenia in the Two Groups

Table 3.

Statistical Analysis Regarding Improvement of Thrombocytopenia and Length of Hospitalization

GroupMean/M. RankMedianBreslau/ Log RankP Value
Duration a 8.6260.003
Case4.4114.000
Control5.7225.000
Moderate5.7790.016
Case4.2004.000
Control4.9475.000
Severe12.0350.001
Case4.6415.000
Control7.5637.000
Hospitalizationb b 4.9160.027
Case5.2415.000
Control6.2316.000
Moderate3.5460.060
Case4.8005.000
Control5.5795.000
Severe7.5050.006
Case5.6786.000
Control7.8757.000

a Duration, Duration in days required for improvement of thrombocytopenia.

b Hospitalization, length of hospital stay (in days).

Duration of hospitalization in the two groups was compared using Kaplan-Meier, Log Rank and Breslau Test. The treatment group had a mean of 5.24 ± 0.244 days and the control group 6.23 ± 0.329 days. The treatment group had a median of 5 ± 0.221 days and the control group 6 ± 0.297 days (Log Rank was 4.825); therefore, there was a significant difference between them (P = 0.028), DF = 1 and Breslau = 4.916 with DF = 1 and P = 0.027 (Figure 2 and Table 3).
Figure 2.

Survival Function Regarding Duration of Hospitalization in the Two Groups

There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding mortality rate, intubation, platelet count, duration of ICU admission, and pulmonary, renal or hepatic involvement. In our study, five patients expired including two patients in the case group (one in moderate thrombocytopenia subgroup and the other in the severe thrombocytopenia subgroup) and three in the control group (all in the severe thrombocytopenia subgroup). One died due to acute renal failure and others died due to multiorgan failure. The two groups were divided into two subgroups according to the severity of thrombocytopenia (Table 2) as moderate (50000 < PLT < 100000) and severe (PLT < 50000). The two subgroups of moderate and severe thrombocytopenia were compared regarding required time for thrombocytopenia improvement; P-values in moderate and severe subgroup were 0.016 and 0.001, respectively, which was statistically significant. Besides, duration of hospital stay was compared between moderate and severe subgroups using Brislow test; P-values were 0.06 and 0.006, respectively, there was no significant differences in moderate group, but the group there were severe a statistical difference was significant (Table 3). There was no significant difference between the two subgroups (moderate and severe thrombocytopenia) between the case and control groups regarding mortality, intubation, length of stay in ICU, pulmonary, renal or hepatic involvement and platelets count. a Duration, Duration in days required for improvement of thrombocytopenia. b Hospitalization, length of hospital stay (in days). a Abbreviations: ICU, intensive care unit; CXR, chest x-ray; N/V, nausea and vomiting; LOC, decreased level of consciousness; LAP, lymphadenopathy; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; CRP, C-reactive protein; INR, international normalized ratio; BILL-T, bilirubin-total; BILL-D, bilirubin-direct; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; ALK.P, alkaline phosphatase. b Duration = Duration in days required for the improvement of thrombocytopenia. c Hospitalization = length of hospital stay (in days).

5. Discussion

There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding renal, pulmonary or hepatic involvement, intubation, mortality rate and hospitalization duration in ICU. The above situations were not improved with treatment of glucocorticoid. Despite the fact, required duration for the improvement of thrombocytopenia and duration of hospitalization in two groups were different significantly. On the other hand, treatment with glucocorticoid caused more rapid recovery of thrombocytopenia and shorter hospital stay. Corticosteroids have an essential role in the treatment of many immune-associated diseases, such as SLE, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ITP. Prednisolone (1 mg/kg/day) is used for the treatment of mild ITP (Immune or Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura); while, high-dose corticosteroid (steroid pulse therapy) is used for the severe forms (1, 13). Russell Villanueva et al. in the Philippines, performed an investigation on 36 patients with leptospirosis and found no significant reduction in mortality, duration of hospitalization and dialysis rates between the control and steroids groups (12). Furthermore, a study by Trivedi et al. in India performed on 602 patients showed that renal and liver involvements had no effect on mortality (14). Similarly, in this study, statistical analysis showed that renal, lung or liver involvements and the severity of thrombocytopenia had no effect on mortality. Contrary to our results, a clinical trial on 30 patients by VV Shenoy et al. in India showed that corticosteroid therapy within 12 hours of pulmonary involvement due to leptospirosis decreased the mortality rate (15). Our study showed that corticosteroid therapy decreased hospital stay only in severe subgroup thrombocytopenia (not in the moderate subgroup). To optimally determine whether adjunctive steroid use in leptospirosis is beneficial, an adequately powered randomized control trial with a larger sample size is recommended.
Table 4.

Demographic Characteristics and Frequency of Clinical and Laboratory Findings in the Groups[a]

Group/Analysis VariableReceived Corticosteroid GroupNot-received Corticosteroid GroupP-ValueTotal Frequency
Number of Patients 282856 (100)
Moderate Thrombocytopenia 151934 (60.7)
Severe Thrombocytopenia 13922 (39.2)
Gender 0.789
Female1413
Male1415
Age 49.75 ± 8.4546.68 ± 11.260.254
Kidney involvement 5 (17.9)5 (17.9)1.000
Lung involvement 5 (17.9)6 (21.4)0.737
Liver involvement 9 (32.1)12 (42.9)0.408
Intubation 4 (14.2)4 (14.2)1.000
Mortality 2 (7.1)3 (10.7)0.500
ICU admission, Mean Rank 28.0228.980.758
Dialysis
Platelet Consumption, Mean Rank 27.7929.210.568
Duration b 0.003
Mean4.41 ± 0.1975.72 ± 0.318
Median4 ± 0.2155 ± 0.255
Hospitalization c 0.028
Mean5.24 ± 0.2446.23 ± 0.329
Median5 ± 0.2216 ± 0.297
Rural 24 (85.7)24 (85.7)48 (85.7)
Farmer 24 (85.7)25 (89.2)49 (87.5)
Weakness 28 (100)28 (100)56 (100)
Fever 28 (100)28 (100)56 (100)
Anorexia 20 (71)20 (71)40 (71.4)
Myalgia 25 (89.28)24 (85.71)49 (87.5)
Arthralgia 20 (71.42)20(71.42)40 (71.4)
N/V 9 (32.1)7 (25)16 (28.5)
Cough 6 (21.4)5 (17.8)11 (19.6)
Headache 7 (25)7 (25)14 (25)
Abdominal pain 5 (17.8)5 (17.8)10 (17.8)
Hemoptysis 1 (3.5)2 (7.1)3 (5.35)
Diarrhea 2 (7.1)2 (7.1)4 (7.1)
Hypotension 3 (10.7)3 (10.7)6 (10.7)
Tachypnea 5 (17.8)6 (21.4)11 (19.6)
Tachycardia 9 (32.1)9 (32.1)18 (32.1)
LOC 2 (7.1)3 (10.7)5 (8.9)
Fever blister 8 (28.5)8 (28.5)16 (28.5)
Rash 5 (17.8)5 (17.8)10 (17.8)
Suffusion 11 (39.2)12 (42.8)23 (41.0)
Icter 9 (32.1)12 (42.8)21 (37.5)
LAP 01 (3.5)1 (1.7)
Rales 4 (14.2)4 (14.2)8 (14.2)
Abdominal tenderness 5 (17.8)6 (21.4)11 (19.6)
Splenomegaly 2 (7.1)3 (10.7)5 (8.9)
Hepatomegaly 01 (3.5)1 (1.7)
Muscular tenderness 10 (35.7)10 (35.7)20 (35.7)
Arrhythmia 1 (3.5)01 (1.7)
Oliguria 5 (17.8)5 (17.8)10 (17.8)
EKG Changes 2 (7.1)1 (3.5)3 (5.35)
CXR Changes 5 (17.8)7 (25)12 (21.4)
Leukocytosis 6 (21.4)8 (28.5)14 (25)
Leucopenia 1 (3.5)3 (10.7)4 (7.1)
Azotemia 5 (17.8)5 (17.8)10 (17.8)
Hyperglycemia 2 (7.1)3 (10.7)5 (8.9)
Hypoglycemia 000
Hyperkalemia 5 (17.8)6 (21.4)11 (19.6)
Hypokalemia 5 (17.8)5 (17.8)10 (17.8)
Hematuria 5 (17.8)7 (25)12
ESR, Total mean 30.20 ± 19.323
CRP, Total mean 0.86 ± 0.724 (0-2 plus)
INR, Total mean 1.10 ± 0.128
BILL-T, Total mean 4.675 ± 4.1387
BILL-D, Total mean 1.996 ± 2.0695
AST, Total mean 114.75 ± 89.278
ALT, Total mean 125.93 ± 91.229
ALK.P, Total mean 374.07 ± 131.135

a Abbreviations: ICU, intensive care unit; CXR, chest x-ray; N/V, nausea and vomiting; LOC, decreased level of consciousness; LAP, lymphadenopathy; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; CRP, C-reactive protein; INR, international normalized ratio; BILL-T, bilirubin-total; BILL-D, bilirubin-direct; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; ALK.P, alkaline phosphatase.

b Duration = Duration in days required for the improvement of thrombocytopenia.

c Hospitalization = length of hospital stay (in days).

  10 in total

Review 1.  Leptospirosis: a zoonotic disease of global importance.

Authors:  Ajay R Bharti; Jarlath E Nally; Jessica N Ricaldi; Michael A Matthias; Monica M Diaz; Michael A Lovett; Paul N Levett; Robert H Gilman; Michael R Willig; Eduardo Gotuzzo; Joseph M Vinetz
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 25.071

2.  A cluster of leptospirosis cases in canoeists following a competition on the River Liffey.

Authors:  M Boland; G Sayers; T Coleman; C Bergin; N Sheehan; E Creamer; M O'Connell; L Jones; W Zochowski
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.451

Review 3.  The management of leptospirosis.

Authors:  Jean-François Faucher; Bruno Hoen; Jean-Marie Estavoyer
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.889

4.  Pulmonary leptospirosis: an excellent response to bolus methylprednisolone.

Authors:  V V Shenoy; V S Nagar; A A Chowdhury; P S Bhalgat; N I Juvale
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  Leptospirosis in Guilan, a northern province of Iran: assessment of the clinical presentation of 74 cases.

Authors:  Fariborz Mansour-Ghanaei; Ali Sarshad; Mohammad-Sadegh Fallah; Arash Pourhabibi; Kaveh Pourhabibi; Mahmood Yousefi-Mashhoor
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2005-04-28

6.  Plasma exchange with immunosuppression in pulmonary alveolar haemorrhage due to leptospirosis.

Authors:  Samir V Trivedi; Ashvin H Vasava; Lovleen C Bhatia; Tinkal C Patel; Nimesh K Patel; Nehal T Patel
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  New approach for serological testing for leptospirosis by using detection of leptospira agglutination by flow cytometry light scatter analysis.

Authors:  S Yitzhaki; A Barnea; A Keysary; E Zahavy
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Cyclophosphamide in pulmonary alveolar hemorrhage due to leptospirosis.

Authors:  Samir V Trivedi; Ashwin H Vasava; Tinkal C Patel; Lovleen C Bhatia
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2009 Apr-Jun

9.  Reversible thick ascending limb dysfunction and aseptic meningitis syndrome: early manifestation in two leptospirosis patients.

Authors:  Huey-Liang Kuo; Chun-Liang Lin; Chiu-Ching Huang
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.606

10.  Evaluation of an IgM-ELISA test for the diagnosis of human leptospirosis.

Authors:  G Vitale; C La Russa; A Galioto; N Chifari; C Mocciaro; R Caruso; A Micalizzi; P Mansueto; S Di Rosa; S Mansueto
Journal:  New Microbiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.479

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Complicated Weil Disease.

Authors:  Vitorino Modesto Dos Santos
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 2.021

2.  Clinical and laboratory manifestation and outcome of icterohemorrhagic leptospirosis patients in Northern Iran.

Authors:  Shahriar Alian; Alireza Davoudi; Narges Najafi; Roya Ghasemian; Fatemeh Ahangarkani; Zeinab Hamdi
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2015-12-15

Review 3.  Management of Travel-Related Infectious Diseases in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Laura Throckmorton; Jonathan Hancher
Journal:  Curr Emerg Hosp Med Rep       Date:  2020-05-06

4.  Leptospirosis in Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Niteen D Karnik; Aditi S Patankar
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2021-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.