| Literature DB >> 25763076 |
Fariba Ghassemi1, Hossein Ghanaati2, Reza Karkhaneh1, Leila Boujabadi1, Seied Zia Tabatabaie1, Mohammad Taher Rajabi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The management of retinoblastoma remains a challenge to the multidisciplinary team, particularly as treatment affects not only visual outcomes, but also ocular retention and morbidity. Management of retinoblastoma has evolved over the past two decades.Entities:
Keywords: Chorioretinal Atrophy; Neovascular Glaucoma; Retinoblastoma
Year: 2014 PMID: 25763076 PMCID: PMC4341168 DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.16958
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Radiol ISSN: 1735-1065 Impact factor: 0.212
Figure 1.Fundus appearance of the patients treated with IAC . A. A calcified tumor in the nasal part of the fundus with a prominent vessel. B. The response of treatment after one IAC with melphalan (3 months). C. Another patient with a tumor (group D). D. The complete response of the tumor with lessening of the vitreous seeds and resulted chorioretinal atrophy and severe choroidal atrophy. This patient had severe diffuse arteriolitis the week after IAC that lasted more than 1 month.
The Demographic Data and Results of the Response to IAC in Retinoblastoma[a]
| Patient Number | Age at the Time of DX(mo) | Group | Vitreous Seeds Before IAC | Previous Local Therapy | Number of IAC Cycles | The Used Drugs in IAC | Tumor Control Achieved | Complications | Vitreous Seeds Response After IAC | New Vitreous Seed After IAC | IVM (during TX) | Enucleation | Reason for Enucleation | Pathologic Findings in the Enucleated Eye | Follow Up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 6 | C | 1 | Cryo, TTT | 1 | 1 | No response | - | No response | 0 | 1 | 1 | Unresponsive to TX | Poorly differentiated | 36 |
|
| 2.5 | D | 1 | Cryo, TTT | 2 | 1,3 | Complete | Vit hemo | NE | 1 | 0 | 24 | |||
|
| 48 | D | 1 | Cryo, TTT | 1 | 1,1 | Complete | Preret hemo | Incomplete response | 1 | 1 | 32 | |||
|
| 60 | D | 1 | Cryo, TTT | 1 | 1 | Partial | NVG, anterior segment involvement, ptosis | Incomplete response | 0 | 0 | 1 | NVG | Poorly differentiated | 57 |
|
| 0.5 | D | 1 | Cryo, TTT | 2 | 1,2 | Partial | - | Incomplete response | 1 | 1 | 1 | Unresponsive to TX | Poorly differentiated | 35 |
|
| 9 | D | 1 | Cryo, TTT | 1 | 1 | Complete | - | Incomplete response | 0 | 0 | 21 | |||
|
| 6 | D | 1 | Cryo, TTT | 1 | 1 | Partial | Vit hemorrhage, total hyphema | NE | 0 | 0 | 1 | Total hyphema | Poorly differentiated | 24 |
|
| 7 | E | 1 | Cryo, TTT, Photocoag | 1 | 2 | Partial and recurrence | - | Incomplete response | 1 | 1 | 3 | |||
|
| 6 | E | 1 | Cryo,TTT,Photocoag | 1 | 1 | Partial | Vit hemo | No response | 0 | 1 | 1 | Anterior segment involvement | Poorly differentiated | 18 |
|
| 4 | D | 0 | Cryo, TTT | 2 | 1,1 | Partial and recurrence | Vit hemo | No response | 1 | 1 | 1 | New tumor developmental and impossible more IAC | Well differentiated | 31 |
|
| 2.1 | D | 0 | TTT | 1 | 1 | Complete | Vit hemo, CRAO,cyclitic membrane,phthisis | NE | 0 | 0 | 1 | 22 | ||
|
| 2.8 | C | 1 | Cryo, TTT | 1 | 2 | No response | Vit hemo | Incomplete response | 1 | 0 | 1 | Unresponsive to TX | Poorly differentiated | 5 |
|
| 4 | D | 1 | Cryo, TTT, subtenon | 2 | 1,2 | Complete | Preret hemo | No response | 1 | 1 | Poorly differentiated | 14 | ||
|
| 5 | D | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | Complete | Severe ch-ret atrophy+ temporary arteriolitis, vit hemo | Incomplete response | 0 | 1 | 5 | |||
|
| 5 | D | 1 | TTT | 2 | 1 | Complete | Preret hemo, retinal fibrosis, RD | Incomplete response | 0 | 1 | 10 | |||
|
| 3.1 | D | 1 | IVM | 2 | 1,3 | Complete | CRAO, ch-ret atrophy, iris atrophy | No response | 1 | 1 | 17 | |||
|
| 2 | D | 1 | TTT | 1 | 1 | Partial | Vit hemo | Complete response | 1 | 0 | 4 | |||
|
| 3.6 | D | 0 | TTT | 2 | 2,2 | Complete | - | Incomplete response | 1 | 1 | 12 | |||
|
| 2 | D | 1 | Cryo, TTT | 1 | 1 | Complete | Severe ch -ret atrophy, ptosis | Incomplete response | 1 | 1 | 15 | |||
|
| 3 | E | 1 | TTT | 1 | 1 | Complete | - | Incomplete response | 0 | 0 | 3 | |||
|
| 4 | B | 1 | Cryo, TTT | 1 | 1 | Complete | Ch ret atrophy,RD | Complete response | 1 | 1 | 14 | |||
|
| 1 | D | 0 | TTT | 2 | 1,1 | Partial and recurrence | Vit hemo,subret hemo,TRD | Incomplete response | 1 | 1 | 1 | Unresponsive to TX | Poorly differentiated | 11 |
|
| 4 | D | 0 | Cryo, TTT | 1 | 1 | Complete | - | NA | 0 | 0 | 6 | |||
|
| 2 | D | 1 | TTT | 2 | 1,2 | Complete | - | Incomplete response | 1 | 0 | 5 |
aAbbreviations: Ch-ret, chorioretinal; Ch-ret atrophy, chorioretinal atrophy; CRAO, central retinal artery occlusion; Cryo, cryotherapy; DX, diagnosis; IAC, intra-arterial chemotherapy; NVG, neovascular glaucoma; Photocoag, photocoagulation; Prere themo, pre retinal hemorrhage; NA, not applicable; NE, not evaluable; RD, retinal detachment; TRD, tractional retinal detachment; TTT, transpupillary thermotherapy; Vit hemo, vitreous hemorrhage; TX, treatment; TRD, tractional retinal detachment
Complications of IAC [a]
| Complication | Second (N = 18), Complication (n = 13) | Primary (N = 6), Complication (n = 3) |
|---|---|---|
|
| 9 | 3 |
|
| 7 | 1 |
|
| 3 | 0 |
|
| 0 | 1 |
|
| 1 | 0 |
|
| 3 | 0 |
|
| 1 | 0 |
|
| 4 | 2 |
|
| 1 | 0 |
|
| 1 | 1 |
|
| 1 | 0 |
|
| 2 | 2 |
|
| 1 | 0 |
aAbbreviations: CRAO, central retinal artery occlusion; NVG, neovascular glaucoma