| Literature DB >> 25763059 |
Hamed Barabadi1, Soheila Honary1, Pouneh Ebrahimi2, Milad Ali Mohammadi1, Ahad Alizadeh3, Farzaneh Naghibi4.
Abstract
The need for eco-friendly and cost effective methods for nanoparticles synthesis is developing interest in biological approaches which are free from the use of toxic chemicals as byproducts. This study aimed to biosynthesize and optimize the size of gold nanoparticles which produced by biotechnological method using Penicillium crustosum isolated from soil. Initially, Penicillium crustosum was grown in fluid czapek dox broth on shaker at 28 °C and 200 rpm for ten days and then the supernatant was separated from the mycelia to convert AuCl₄ solution into gold nanoparticles. The synthesized nanoparticles in the optimum conditions were formed with fairly well-defined dimensions and good monodispersity. The characterizations were done by using different methods (UV-Visible Spectroscopy, Fluorescence, FT-IR, AFM (Atomic Force Microscopy) and DLS (Dynamic Light Scattering). The bioconversion was optimized by Box-Behnken experimental design. The results show that the effective factors in this process were concentration of AuCl₄, pH of medium and temperature of shaker incubator. The R(2) value was calculated to be 0.9999 indicating the accuracy and ability of the polynomial model. It can be concluded that the use of multivariate analysis facilitated to find out the optimum conditions for the biosynthesis of gold nanoparticles induced by Penicillium crustosum in a time and cost effective process. The current approach suggested that rapid synthesis of gold nanoparticles would be suitable for developing a biological process for mass scale production of formulations.Entities:
Keywords: Penicillium crustosum; biosynthesis; box-behnken design; gold nanoparticles; optimization
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25763059 PMCID: PMC4323328 DOI: 10.1590/s1517-83822014000400046
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Variables and experimental design levels for response surface.
| Level | X1 | X2 | X3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | 6 | 0.5 | 25 |
| 0 | 7 | 1.75 | 31 |
| +1 | 8 | 3 | 37 |
X1, X2 and X3 refer to pH of medium, concentration of AuCl4 (mM) and temperature of shaker incubator (°C), respectively.
Figure 1A: UV-Visible absorption spectra of the synthesized gold nanoparticles. A(a): The fluorescence absorption spectrum of the synthesized gold nanoparticles. B: The culture medium of Penicillium crustosum.
Figure 2FT-IR spectrum of gold nanoparticles synthesized by Penicillium crustosum. Figure 2(a): Schematic proposed mechanism of gold ions bioreduction via NADPH-dependent reductase enzymes.
Figure 3The AFM image of gold nanoparticles in the solutions showed a mean average size under 100 nm that was adapted with the result of DLS showed in Figure 4.
Figure 4A: Dynamic light scattering (DLS) of the gold nanoparticles. A(a): Correlogram of gold nanoparticles showed small synthesized particles in which the correlation of the signal decays more rapidly. B: The zeta potential of the gold nanoparticles.
Experimental conditions for Box-Behenken design and average response for particle size.
| Trial | average diameter (nm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | + | + | 0 | 142 |
| 2 | + | − | 0 | 169 |
| 3 | − | 0 | 203 | |
| 4 | − | − | 0 | 102 |
| 5 | + | 0 | + | 53 |
| 6 | + | 0 | − | 131 |
| 7 | − | 0 | 198 | |
| 8 | − | 0 | − | 149 |
| 9 | 0 | + | 203 | |
| 10 | 0 | − | 211 | |
| 11 | 0 | − | + | 195 |
| 12 | 0 | − | − | 117 |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 104 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 103 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 102 |
X1, X2 and X3 refer to pH of medium, concentration of AuCl4 (mM) and temperature of shaker incubator (°C), respectively.
Analysis of variance for the fitted quadratic polynomial model of optimization of size of biosynthesized gold nanoparticles.
| Source | Sum of squares | Degree of freedom | Mean square | F-value | Probability (p) > F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 33575.73 | 12 | 2797.98 | 2797.98 | 0.0004 |
| Pure error | 2.00 | 2 | 1.00 | ||
| R2 | 0.9999 | ||||
| Adj R2 | 0.9996 |
Regression coefficients and their significance of the quadratic model of optimization of size of biosynthesized gold nanoparticles.
| Model term | Coefficient estimate | Degree of freedom | Standard error | Probability (p) F |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | +103.00 | 1 | 0.58 | 0.0004 |
| −40.75 | 1 | 0.50 | 0.0002 | |
| +25.50 | 1 | 0.50 | 0.0004 | |
| +17.50 | 1 | 0.50 | 0.0008 | |
| −32.00 | 1 | 0.50 | 0.0002 | |
| −31.75 | 1 | 0.50 | 0.0002 | |
| −21.50 | 1 | 0.50 | 0.0005 | |
| +1.13 | 1 | 0.52 | 0.1632 | |
| +49.87 | 1 | 0.52 | 0.0001 | |
| +28.63 | 1 | 0.52 | 0.0003 | |
| −7.00 | 1 | 0.71 | 0.0101 | |
| −24.75 | 1 | 0.71 | 0.0008 | |
| +42.25 | 1 | 0.71 | 0.0003 |
X1, X2 and X3 refer to pH of medium, concentration of AuCl4 (mM) and temperature of shaker incubator (°C), respectively.
Figure 5Schematic representation of surface plasmon oscillation under the effect of an electromagnetic field.
Figure 6Contour plot of pH of medium (X1) and concentration of AuCl4 (mM) (X2) on the size of gold nanoparticles, when temperature of shaker incubator (X3) was maintained at 31 °C.
Figure 7Contour plot of pH of medium (X1) and temperature of shaker incubator (°C) (X3) on the size of gold nanoparticles, when concentration of AuCl4 (X2) was maintained at 1.75 mM.
Figure 8Contour plot of concentration of AuCl4 (mM) (X2) and temperature of shaker incubator (°C) (X3) on the size of gold nanoparticles, when pH of medium (X1) was maintained at value of 7.