| Literature DB >> 25763039 |
Sthéfane G Araújo1, Lucas F Alves1, Maria Eduarda A Pinto1, Graziela T Oliveira1, Ezequias P Siqueira2, Rosy I M A Ribeiro1, Jaqueline M S Ferreira1, Luciana A R S Lima1.
Abstract
Bacterial infections cause thousands of deaths in the world every year. In most cases, infections are more serious because the patient is already weakened, and often, the bacteria are already resistant to the antibiotics used. Counterparting this negative scenario, the interest in medicinal plants as an alternative to the synthetic antimicrobial drugs is blossoming worldwide. In the present work, we identified the volatile compounds of ethanol extracts of Melissa officinalis, Mentha sp., Ocimum basilicum, Plectranthus barbatus, and Rosmarinus officinalis by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Also was evaluated antimicrobial activity of ethanol extracts against 6 bacteria of clinical interest, and was tested the interaction of these extracts with a commercial antibiotic streptomycin. Phytol was a compound identified in all extracts by GC/MS, being majoritary component in Plectranthus barbatus and Rosmarinus officinalis. The Gram-positive bacteria were more sensitive to ethanol extracts, and Plectranthus barbatus and Rosmarinus officinalis were the most active extracts. Ethanol extracts exhibited a synergetic effect with streptomycin. These results encourage additional studies, in order to evaluate the possibilities of using ethanol extracts of Lamiaceae family as natural source for antibacterial activity.Entities:
Keywords: Lamiaceae; antibacterial; ethanol extracts; streptomycin; volatile compounds
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25763039 PMCID: PMC4323308 DOI: 10.1590/s1517-83822014000400026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and Minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) of ethanol extracts from five species of Lamiaceae family against six bacteria of clinical interest.
| Extracts | Streptomycin | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| Bacteria | MIC μg/mL | MBC μg/mL | MIC μg/mL | MBC μg/mL | MIC μg/mL | MBC μg/mL | MIC μg/mL | MBC μg/mL | MIC μg/mL | MBC μg/mL | MIC μg/mL | MBC μg/mL |
| 2000 | > 2000 | 1000 | > 2000 | 1000 | > 2000 | 1000 | > 2000 | 500 | 2000 | 15 | 30 | |
| > 2000 | ND | > 2000 | ND | > 2000 | ND | 1000 | 2000 | 250 | 250 | 7.5 | 15 | |
| 250 | > 2000 | 500 | > 2000 | 250 | > 2000 | 1000 | > 2000 | 500 | 2000 | 15 | 30 | |
| > 2000 | ND | > 2000 | ND | > 2000 | ND | 250 | > 2000 | 250 | > 2000 | 15 | 30 | |
| > 2000 | ND | > 2000 | ND | > 2000 | ND | > 2000 | ND | 2000 | > 2000 | 7.5 | 15 | |
| > 2000 | ND | > 2000 | ND | > 2000 | ND | 250 | 2000 | > 2000 | ND | 15 | 30 | |
ND: Non determined.
Fractional inhibiting concentration (FIC) and FIC index (FICI) of ethanol extracts from species of Lamiaceae family against bacteria of clinical interest.
| Bacteria | Samples | FIC | FICI | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | 0.25 | 0.5 | S | |
| 2. Streptomycin | 0.25 | |||
| 1. | 0.5 | 1.0 | I | |
| 2. Streptomycin | 0.5 | |||
| 1. | 0.25 | 0.5 | S | |
| 2. Streptomycin | 0.25 | |||
| 1. | 0.25 | 0.5 | S | |
| 2. Streptomycin | 0.25 | |||
| 1. | 0.25 | 0.5 | S | |
| 2. Streptomycin | 0.25 | |||
| 1. | 0.25 | 0.5 | S | |
| 2. Streptomycin | 0.25 | |||
| 1. | 0.25 | 0.5 | S | |
| 2. Streptomycin | 0.25 | |||
| 1. | 0.25 | 0.5 | S | |
| 2. Streptomycin | 0.25 | |||
| 1. | 0.25 | 0.5 | S | |
| 2. Streptomycin | 0.25 |
FICI ≤ 0.5: synergistic effect (S); 0.5 < FICI < 2.0: additive or indifferent effect (I); FICI > 2.0: Antagonistic effect (A).
Figure 1Isobolograms showing interactions between streptomycin and ethanol extracts from species of Lamiaceae family. Data are the fractional inhibitory concentrations (FICs) of the two samples in combination. y-axis, streptomycin; x-axis, ethanol extracts from species of Lamiaceae family. Straight lines, result expected if the factors had additive interactions; concave and convex lines, synergistic and antagonistic interactions, respectively.
Figure 2Structures of majoritary compounds 1–13 identified by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry obtained from ethanol extracts of five species of Lamiaceae family.
Majoritary compounds of ethanol extracts from species of Lamiaceae family.
| Species | Majoritary compounds (%) |
|---|---|
| nonadecane (25.13%); heptadecane (18.32%); 2, 6-dimethyl heptane (17.81%); phytol (13.84%) | |
| 2-decen-1-ol (23.55%); 1, 5, 9-decatriene (13.50%); phytol (12.55%); 2(3H)-furanone | |
| 9, 12, 15-octadecatrienoic acid ethyl ester (26.19%); phytol (18.36%); cadinene (10.92%) | |
| phytol (35.18%); verbenone (12.89%); camphor (10.55%) | |
| phytol (40.32%); urs-12-ene (19.57%); verbenone (12.76%); camphor (12.11%); 9, 11-dimethyltetracyclo[7.3.1.0(2.7).1(7.11)]tetradecane (11.38%) |
Concentration in percentage, calculated relative to the normalized areas of the peaks.