Literature DB >> 25762400

Negative prognostic influence of micropapillary pattern in stage IA lung adenocarcinoma.

Norifumi Tsubokawa1, Takahiro Mimae1, Shinsuke Sasada1, Tomoharu Yoshiya1, Takeshi Mimura1, Shuji Murakami2, Hiroyuki Ito3, Yoshihiro Miyata1, Haruhiko Nakayama3, Morihito Okada4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: There is uncertainty as to which factors determine the aggressiveness of lung adenocarcinoma with a micropapillary pattern (MPP). The present study aimed to clarify the influence of a MPP on the malignant aggressiveness of clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma.
METHODS: We retrospectively examined 347 consecutive patients with clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma who underwent complete resection. We defined MPP-positive as accounting for ≥5% of the entire tumour.
RESULTS: Forty-eight (14%) and 299 (86%) patients were MPP-positive and negative, respectively. Lymphatic (P = 0.003) and vessel (P = 0.029) invasion as well as lymph node metastasis (P = 0.002) were more frequent in the MPP-positive than negative group. Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were significantly lower in the MPP-positive than negative group (69.7 vs 89.3%, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis for DFS showed that MPP (P = 0.048), lymphatic invasion (P = 0.003) and vessel invasion (P = 0.002) were independent poor prognostic factors. In addition, higher proportions (<5%, 5-30% and ≥30%) of MPP were associated with a poorer prognosis (89.3, 76.0, and 48.1%, respectively; P < 0.001). The prognosis of patients with MPP-positive tumours and negative tumours harbouring lepidic and solid predominant growth patents did not differ (100 vs 96.8%, P = 0.564; 66.7 vs 62.5%, P = 0.791, respectively). On the other hand, the prognosis tended to be poorer for patients with papillary predominant MPP-positive tumours than for those with negative tumours (62.5 vs 82.5%, P = 0.075).
CONCLUSIONS: MPP has an effect on tumour malignancy and patients with tumours harbouring a higher ratio of MPP or papillary predominant subtypes have worse survival.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lung cancer; Micropapillary; Prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25762400     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  16 in total

1.  Prognostic contribution of non-predominant solid and micropapillary components in lung adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Masaki Suzuki; Tomoyuki Yokose; Haruhiko Nakayama
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Micropapillary histological subtype in lung adenocarcinoma of 2 cm or less: impact on recurrence and clinical predictors.

Authors:  Yukihiro Yoshida; Jun-Ichi Nitadori; Aya Shinozaki-Ushiku; Jiro Sato; Tempei Miyaji; Takuhiro Yamaguchi; Masashi Fukayama; Jun Nakajima
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-02-27

3.  The more the micropapillary pattern in stage I lung adenocarcinoma, the worse the prognosis-a retrospective study on digitalized slides.

Authors:  Tamás Zombori; Tibor Nyári; László Tiszlavicz; Regina Pálföldi; Edit Csada; Tibor Géczi; Aurél Ottlakán; Balázs Pécsy; Gábor Cserni; József Furák
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  Papillary predominant histological subtype predicts poor survival in lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Demet Yaldız; Arkın Acar; Şeyda Örs Kaya; Zekiye Aydoğdu; Soner Gürsoy; Sadık Yaldız
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 0.332

5.  Targeted Sequencing Analysis of Predominant Histological Subtypes in Resected Stage I Invasive Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yan Li; Yan Tan; Song Hu; Jun Xie; Zhantao Yan; Xian Zhang; Yun Zong; Han Han-Zhang; Qing Li; Chong Li
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 4.207

6.  Micropapillary lung adenocarcinoma and micrometastasis.

Authors:  Yang Qu; Rania G Aly; Yusuke Takahashi; Prasad S Adusumilli
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.005

7.  Expansion of the Concept of Micropapillary Adenocarcinoma to Include a Newly Recognized Filigree Pattern as Well as the Classical Pattern Based on 1468 Stage I Lung Adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Katsura Emoto; Takashi Eguchi; Kay See Tan; Yusuke Takahashi; Rania G Aly; Natasha Rekhtman; William D Travis; Prasad S Adusumilli
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 15.609

8.  Risk stratification model for patients with stage I invasive lung adenocarcinoma based on clinical and pathological predictors.

Authors:  Yiyang Wang; Difan Zheng; Jizhuang Luo; Jie Zhang; Cecilia Pompili; Hideki Ujiie; Natsumi Matsuura; Haiquan Chen; Feng Yao
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2021-05

9.  Minor Components of Micropapillary and Solid Subtypes in Lung Adenocarcinoma are Predictors of Lymph Node Metastasis and Poor Prognosis.

Authors:  Yue Zhao; Rui Wang; Xuxia Shen; Yunjian Pan; Chao Cheng; Yuan Li; Lei Shen; Yang Zhang; Hang Li; Difan Zheng; Ting Ye; Shanbo Zheng; Yihua Sun; Haiquan Chen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 10.  Clinical impacts of a micropapillary pattern in lung adenocarcinoma: a review.

Authors:  Ying Cao; Li-Zhen Zhu; Meng-Jie Jiang; Ying Yuan
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.