Literature DB >> 25762205

Delayed timing of post-challenge peak blood glucose predicts declining beta cell function and worsening glucose tolerance over time: insight from the first year postpartum.

Caroline K Kramer1, Chang Ye, Anthony J G Hanley, Philip W Connelly, Mathew Sermer, Bernard Zinman, Ravi Retnakaran.   

Abstract

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: On cross-sectional assessment, a delayed timing of the peak blood glucose level at ≥60 min post-challenge on an OGTT is associated with beta cell dysfunction. In this context, we hypothesised that longitudinal changes in the timing of this peak might predict changes in glucose metabolism. We thus sought to evaluate the longitudinal associations of changes in the timing of the peak glucose level with changes over time in insulin sensitivity, beta cell function and glucose tolerance.
METHODS: A total of 532 women underwent an OGTT at both 3 months and 12 months postpartum. The participants were stratified into four groups according to the change in timing of their glucose peak between the two visits: women with no change in timing of the glucose peak at 30 min (n = 217), those whose glucose peak shifted to an earlier time point (n = 120), those whose peak shifted to a later time point (n = 87) and women with an unchanged glucose peak at ≥60 min (n = 108). Beta cell function was measured using the Insulin Secretion-Sensitivity Index-2 (ISSI-2).
RESULTS: Compared with an unchanged glucose peak at 30 min, both the shift of the glucose peak to a later time point and a peak that was unchanged at ≥60 min were independently associated with declining ISSI-2 scores (β = -127.5, p < 0.001 and β = -98.8, p = 0.006, respectively) and increased 2 h post-challenge glucose levels (β = 1.28, p < 0.001 and β = 0.91, p < 0.001, respectively) between the two visits. Furthermore, both these patterns of change in peak were independently associated with worsening glucose tolerance (from normal to prediabetes [defined as impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance]/diabetes or from prediabetes to diabetes) (OR 8.1, 95% CI 3.0, 22.1 and OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.2, 11.7, respectively). CONCLUSIONS/
INTERPRETATION: A delayed timing of the post-challenge peak glucose level is associated with declining beta cell function and worsening glucose tolerance over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25762205     DOI: 10.1007/s00125-015-3551-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetologia        ISSN: 0012-186X            Impact factor:   10.122


  32 in total

Review 1.  First-phase insulin secretion: does it exist in real life? Considerations on shape and function.

Authors:  Andrea Caumo; Livio Luzi
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.310

2.  The shape of plasma glucose concentration curve during OGTT predicts future risk of type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Muhammad A Abdul-Ghani; Valeriya Lyssenko; Tiinamaija Tuomi; Ralph A Defronzo; Leif Groop
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.876

3.  Beyond the morphology of the glucose curve following an oral glucose tolerance test in obese youth.

Authors:  Giuseppe Nolfe; Maria Rita Spreghini; Rita Wietrzycowska Sforza; Giuseppe Morino; Melania Manco
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 6.664

4.  Beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity contribute to the shape of plasma glucose curve during an oral glucose tolerance test in non-diabetic individuals.

Authors:  M Kanauchi; K Kimura; K Kanauchi; Y Saito
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2014.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Emerging parameters of the insulin and glucose response on the oral glucose tolerance test: reproducibility and implications for glucose homeostasis in individuals with and without diabetes.

Authors:  Caroline Kaercher Kramer; Vladimir Vuksan; Haysook Choi; Bernard Zinman; Ravi Retnakaran
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 5.602

7.  Modelling of OGTT curve identifies 1 h plasma glucose level as a strong predictor of incident type 2 diabetes: results from two prospective cohorts.

Authors:  Akram Alyass; Peter Almgren; Mikael Akerlund; Jonathan Dushoff; Bo Isomaa; Peter Nilsson; Tiinamaija Tuomi; Valeriya Lyssenko; Leif Groop; David Meyre
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 10.122

8.  Insulin sensitivity indices obtained from oral glucose tolerance testing: comparison with the euglycemic insulin clamp.

Authors:  M Matsuda; R A DeFronzo
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Shape information in repeated glucose curves during pregnancy provided significant physiological information for neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Kathrine Frey Frøslie; Jo Røislien; Elisabeth Qvigstad; Kristin Godang; Jens Bollerslev; Tore Henriksen; Marit B Veierød
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Shape information from glucose curves: functional data analysis compared with traditional summary measures.

Authors:  Kathrine Frey Frøslie; Jo Røislien; Elisabeth Qvigstad; Kristin Godang; Jens Bollerslev; Nanna Voldner; Tore Henriksen; Marit B Veierød
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  8 in total

1.  Two- vs one-hour glucose tolerance testing: Predicting prediabetes in adolescent girls with obesity.

Authors:  Kannan Kasturi; Anthony U Onuzuruike; Shwetha Kunnam; Lauren B Shomaker; Jack A Yanovski; Stephanie T Chung
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 4.866

2.  Time to glucose peak during an oral glucose tolerance test identifies prediabetes risk.

Authors:  Stephanie T Chung; Joon Ha; Anthony U Onuzuruike; Kannan Kasturi; Mirella Galvan-De La Cruz; Brianna A Bingham; Rafeal L Baker; Jean N Utumatwishima; Lilian S Mabundo; Madia Ricks; Arthur S Sherman; Anne E Sumner
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2017-08-06       Impact factor: 3.478

3.  Metabolic and Genetic Determinants of Glucose Shape After Oral Challenge in Obese Youths: A Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Alfonso Galderisi; Domenico Tricò; Chiara Dalla Man; Nicola Santoro; Bridget Pierpont; Leif Groop; Claudio Cobelli; Sonia Caprio
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Oral Glucose Tolerance Test Glucose Peak Time Is Most Predictive of Prediabetes and Hepatic Steatosis in Obese Girls.

Authors:  Melanie Cree-Green; Danielle Xie; Haseeb Rahat; Yesenia Garcia-Reyes; Bryan C Bergman; Ann Scherzinger; Cecilia Diniz Behn; Christine L Chan; Megan M Kelsey; Laura Pyle; Kristen J Nadeau
Journal:  J Endocr Soc       Date:  2018-05-07

5.  Subtypes of gestational diabetes and future risk of pre-diabetes or diabetes.

Authors:  Ravi Retnakaran; Chang Ye; Anthony J Hanley; Philip W Connelly; Mathew Sermer; Bernard Zinman
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-08-12

6.  Time to the Peak, Shape of the Curve and Combination of These Glucose Response Characteristics During Oral Glucose Tolerance Test as Indicators of Early Beta-cell Dysfunction in Obese Adolescents

Authors:  Lavinia La Grasta Sabolić; Marija Požgaj Šepec; Maja Cigrovski Berković; Gordana Stipančić
Journal:  J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol       Date:  2020-10-02

7.  Time to Peak Glucose and Peak C-Peptide During the Progression to Type 1 Diabetes in the Diabetes Prevention Trial and TrialNet Cohorts.

Authors:  Michael G Voss; David D Cuthbertson; Mario M Cleves; Ping Xu; Carmella Evans-Molina; Jerry P Palmer; Maria J Redondo; Andrea K Steck; Markus Lundgren; Helena Larsson; Wayne V Moore; Mark A Atkinson; Jay M Sosenko; Heba M Ismail
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 17.152

8.  Noninvasive Continuous Glucose Monitoring Using a Multisensor-Based Glucometer and Time Series Analysis.

Authors:  Zhanxiao Geng; Fei Tang; Yadong Ding; Shuzhe Li; Xiaohao Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.