| Literature DB >> 25762102 |
Małgorzata Wierzbicka1, Olga Bemowska-Kałabun, Barbara Gworek.
Abstract
Railway transport is a source of pollution to soils and living organisms by e.g. PAHs, PCBs, oil-derived products, pesticides and heavy metals. Soil toxicity evaluation requires chemical analyses, indicating the type and content of particular pollutants, as well as biological analyses, which allow assessing the reaction of organisms to these pollutants. This paper is focused on a multi-aspect evaluation of the degree of toxicity and pollution of soil in selected railway areas from north-eastern Poland by application of numerous biotests and chemical analyses. The soils were sampled on railway tracks from the following railway stations: Białystok Fabryczny, Siemianówka, Hajnówka, Iława Główna and Waliły. The most toxic soils occur on the railway tracks at Białystok Fabryczny and Siemianówka. They had a significant toxic effect on test organisms from various trophic levels. The contents of PAHs, PCBs, heavy metals, oil-derived hydrocarbons and pesticide residues were determined in the examined soils. In all cases the detected pollutants did not exceed the admissible levels. The highest content of oil-derived substances was noted in soils from Białystok Fabryczny and concentrations were moderate in soils from Siemianówka. Although the pollutants determined in soils from railway tracks did not exceed the admissible values, they had a toxic effect on numerous test organisms from different trophic levels. This suggests a synergistic effect of low concentrations (within the admissible levels) of several pollutants together, which resulted in a toxic effect on the organisms. Thus, there is a strong need of not only chemical, but also ecotoxicological analyses during the evaluation of environmental conditions. Based on data obtained from biological and chemical analyses, we concluded that railway transport may pose a hazard to the natural environment to a larger extent that hitherto expected.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25762102 PMCID: PMC4387276 DOI: 10.1007/s10646-015-1426-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecotoxicology ISSN: 0963-9292 Impact factor: 2.823
Fig. 1Location of soil sampling sites on railway tracks. The stations are located in north-eastern Poland: Iława Główna a, Białystok Fabryczny b, Waliły c, Siemianówka d and Hajnówka e
General data on the railway stations where the soils were sampled for analysis
| Station | Status | Surroundings | Coordinates |
|---|---|---|---|
| Białystok Fabryczny, track 34 | Active; cargo transport; low transport intensity | Track located on a 2-m high embankment; poor substrate located on gravel and wooden ties; rare vegetation, composed of grasses and | 53°08′25″N 23°11′02″E |
| Siemianówka | Active; cargo transport | One track; station area surrounded by ruderal species | 52°54′03″N 23°49′07″E |
| Hajnówka, switch | Active; cargo transport | Poor vegetation cover on the active track; rich vegetation on the closed-down tracks; ruderal species around the station | 52°44′02″N 23°35′00″E |
| Iława Główna (2 samples: siding and bottle-washer) | Active; cargo and passenger transport | Junction covers area of ~2 km2; the surroundings encompass: platforms, buildings of the passenger station, railway siding, transfer site, bottle-washer; important junction of railway tracks connecting the west with east and the north with the south of Poland | 53°34′58″N 19°34′27″E |
| Waliły | Currently closed-down; earlier cargo transport | Track substrate composed of broken stone and concrete ties; abundant | 53°06′29″N 23°38′51″E |
Chemical parameters of the subsoil from some railway areas in north-eastern Poland (Galera et al. 2011)
| Railway areas | pH (H2O) | pH (KCl) | Total, N (%) | Available P, mg 100 g−1 | Mg, mg 100 g−1 | Ca, mg 100 g−1 | Na, mg 100 g−1 | K, mg 100 g−1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Białowieża Towarowa | 7.69 | 7.56 | 0.279 | 1.030 | 12.863 | 363.585 | 1.507 | 6.950 |
| Narewka—railway siding | 8.00 | 7.94 | 0.084 | 1.399 | 6.410 | 254.767 | 0.318 | 1.869 |
| Nowosady—forest | 7.77 | 7.50 | 0.374 | 4.894 | 7.371 | 213.033 | 0.405 | 1.775 |
| Straszewo—forest loading ramp | 7.88 | 7.82 | 0.090 | 2.432 | 4.596 | 190.917 | 0.428 | 2.081 |
| Białowieża Pałac | 7.72 | 7.53 | 0.134 | 1.723 | 16.567 | 346.225 | 1.768 | 6.630 |
| Nowosady—grassland | 7.73 | 7.53 | 0.360 | 4.340 | 29.380 | 261.450 | 0.573 | 0.466 |
| Lewki | 7.98 | 7.76 | 0.098 | 5.082 | 9.363 | 304.100 | 1.694 | 7.446 |
| Kołaki—small station in the forest | 7.58 | 7.24 | 0.317 | 4.467 | 9.363 | 340.775 | 1.887 | 11.696 |
| Hajnówka | 7.37 | 7.23 | 0.368 | 4.070 | 10.642 | 331.350 | 2.562 | 7.304 |
| Siemianówka | 7.78 | 7.57 | 0.215 | 6.493 | 6.313 | 214.542 | 0.896 | 1.885 |
| Sokoły—town station | 7.98 | 7.68 | 0.242 | 10.010 | 7.550 | 379.983 | 2.322 | 10.067 |
| Białystok Fabryczny | 7.80 | 7.39 | 0.341 | 36.391 | 14.546 | 400.441 | 2.176 | 11.592 |
General characteristics of the applied biotests
| Test | Phytotoxkit™ | Ostracodtoxkit F™ | Daphtoxkit F™ | Microtox |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test organism | Plants: | Crustaceans: | Crustaceans: | Bacteria: |
| Final points of toxicity measurements | Root growth inhibition | Mortality; growth inhibition | Mortality | Bioluminescence inhibition |
| Exposure time | 7 days | 6 days | 72 h | 5 and 15 min |
| Test type | Chronic | Chronic | Acute | Acute |
| Standards | Analogous to ISOa 11269-1 | Approval by ISO pending | In accordance with: OECD Guideline 202 and ISO 6341 | In accordance with: ISO, DINc, EPAd, AFNORe, ASTMf |
| Repetitions | 5 | 6 | 4 | 2 |
| Control batch | Reference soil, in accordance with OECDb (for soil toxicity tests) | Standardized sand which is part of the experimental kit | Hydrobiological medium (water from | 2 % NaCl solution |
aISO (International Organization for Standardization)
bOECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development)
cDIN (Deutsches Institut für Normung)
dUSEPA/EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency)
eAFNOR (Association Française de Normalisation)
fASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials)
Fig. 2Root toxicity index for Lepidium sativum a, Sinapis alba b and Sorghum saccharatum c. Higher percentage of the toxicity index indicates a higher toxicity of the substrate
Fig. 3Root length in Lepidium sativum a, Sinapis alba b and Sorghum saccharatum c grown on soils from railway tracks and on the reference soil
Statistical analysis of the results of root growth for L. sativum, S. alba and S. saccharatum on soils from railway tracks in relation to the control reference soil
| Test organism | Station | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Białystok Fabryczny | Siemianówka | Hajnówka | Iława Główna, siding | Iława Główna, bottle-washer | Waliły | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Day | Day | Day | Day | Day | Day | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 7 | |
|
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | + | − | − |
|
| − | − | − | + | + | − | + | + | + | + | + | − | − | − | − | + | + | + | − | − | + | + | + | + | − | + | + | + | − | − |
|
| − | − | + | + | + | − | − | + | + | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
The numbers refer to the subsequent days of Phytotoxkit test duration. A plus (+) refers to statistically significant differences and a minus (−) refers to results insignificant in relation to the control soil. Statistical analysis was conducted using STATISTICA software. The non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test was used (for many independent samples). The significance level was at α = 0.05
Fig. 4Mortality of test organisms (Heterocypris incongruens) incubated on the examined soils; black line refers to the LC50 effect
Fig. 5Growth inhibition in test organisms (Heterocypris incongruens) incubated on the examined soils in comparison to the reference soil. Plus (+) refers to statistically significant differences in comparison to the reference soil. Statistical analysis was conducted using STATISTICA software. The non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test was used (for many independent samples). The significance level was at α = 0.05
Fig. 6Toxicity index in Daphnia magna after 24, 48 and 72 h of incubation in all examined soil extracts; 100 % concentration. Higher percentage of the toxicity index indicates a higher toxicity of the examined substrate
Fig. 7Toxicity index in Daphnia magna after 24, 48 and 72 h of incubation in the most toxic extracts—samples from Białystok Fabryczny and Siemianówka (concentrations: 100; 50; 25; 12.5 and 6.25 %). Higher percentage of the toxicity index indicates a higher toxicity of the examined substrate
Fig. 8Inhibition of light production in the bacteria Vibrio fischeri after 5 and 15 min of exposure to contact with the soil extract in relation to the control batch—all samples, 100 % concentrations. Black line refers to the EC50 effect
Fig. 9Inhibition of light production in the bacteria Vibrio fischeri after 5 and 15 min of exposure to contact with the soil extract in relation to the control batch—sample from the railway tracks at Białystok Fabryczny, at increasing concentrations (from 0.02 to 100 %). Black line refers to the EC50 effect
Fig. 10Inhibition of light production in the bacteria Vibrio fischeri after 5 and 15 min of exposure to contact with the soil extract in relation to the control batch—sample from the railway tracks at Siemianówka, at increasing concentrations (from 0.02 to 100 %). Black line refers to the EC50 effect
Results of chemical analysis of the soil samples collected from the railway tracks at Białystok Fabryczny, Siemianówka and Waliły, as well as the Polish legal laws for soils
| Parameter | Station | Polish legal limits for soilsa | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Białystok Fabryczny | Siemianówka | Waliły | Communication and industrial areas, mining areas | |
| Depth [mbgsb] | ||||
| 0–2 | ||||
| ∑ petrols (C6–C12) | 134.1 ± 40.2c | 92.1 ± 27.6 | 13.4 ± 4.0 | 500d |
| ∑ mineral oils (C12–C35) | 2520.0 ± 730.8 | 1099.0 ± 318.7 | 831.5 ± 241.1 | 3000e |
| ∑ PAHs | 20.5 ± 4.9 | 3.3 ± 0.8 | 2.3 ± 0.6 | 250f |
| ∑ PCBs | 0.116 ± 0.046 | <0.021 | <0.021 | 2g |
| Zinc | 130 ± 10.4 | 75 ± 6.0 | 106 ± 8.58 | 1000 |
| Copper | 107 ± 16.1 | 27 ± 4.1 | 46 ± 6.9 | 600 |
| Lead | 153 ± 27.5 | 20 ± 3.6 | 27 ± 4.9 | 600 |
| Nickel | 14 ± 3.4 | 17 ± 4.1 | 52 ± 12.5 | 300 |
| Mercury | 0.06 ± 0.01 | <0.05 | <0.05 | 30 |
| Cadmium | <0.70 | <0.70 | <0.70 | 15 |
| Chromium | 25 ± 5.3 | 15 ± 3.2 | 70 ± 14.7 | 500 |
Sums: petrols (C6–C12), mineral oils (C12–C35), PAHs (naphtalene, phenanthrene, anthracene, fluoranthene, chryzene, benz[a]anthracene, benz[a]pirene, benz[a]fluoranthene, benz[ghi]perylene), PCBs (congeners: 28, 52, 101, 118, 138, 153, 180) and heavy metal content (Zn, Cu, Pb, Ni, Hg, Cd, Cr) in mg/kg
a(Journal of Laws 2002, no. 165, pos. 1359)
b“Meters below ground surface”
cPresented uncertainty values represent expanded uncertainty at coefficient k = 2 and confidence level at 95 %
dReferring to the sum of aliphatic, naphthene and aromatic hydrocarbons containing 6–12 carbon atoms in the compound, including mono-aromatic compounds BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylobenzene and xylene)
eReferring to the sum of aliphatic, naphthene and aromatic hydrocarbons containing 12–35 carbon atoms and above in the compound, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons PAHs (naphthalene, phenanthrene, anthracene, fluoranthene, chrysene, benz(a)anthracene, benz(a)pyrene, benz(a)fluoranthene, benz(ghi)perylene)
fReferring to the sum of PAH concentrations, i.e. naphthalene, fenantrene, antracene, fluorantrene, chrysene, benz(a)anthracene, benz(a)pyrene, benz(a)fluoranthene, benz(ghi)perylene
gPCBs—referring to polychlorane diphenyls, polychlorane triphenyls, monometylotetrachlorodiphenylometane, monometylodichlorodiphenylometane, monometylofibromodiphenylometane and mixtures containing any of these substances in amounts exceeding 0.005 % total weight (Journal of Laws 2001, no. 62, pos. 627; Journal of Laws 2002, no. 165, pos. 1359)
Results of biotests for the analysed soils from railway tracks from stations in north-eastern Poland
| Station | Phytotoxkit | Ostracodtoxkit | Daphtoxkit | Microtox | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Białystok Fabryczny |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Siemianówka |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hajnówka |
| − | − | − | − | − |
| Iława Główna, siding |
| − |
| − |
| − |
| Iława Główna, bottle-washer |
| − | − |
| − |
|
| Waliły |
| − |
| − | − | − |
The symbols refer to soils with high toxicity (+), soils with medium toxicity (+/−), and non-toxic soils (−) with regard to the test organisms applied in particular biotests