| Literature DB >> 25761515 |
Ehsan Karimi, Hawa Z E Jaafar, Ali Ghasemzadeh, Mahdi Ebrahimi.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The present study was conducted in order to evaluate theEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25761515 PMCID: PMC4417259 DOI: 10.1186/0717-6287-48-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Res ISSN: 0716-9760 Impact factor: 5.612
Total phenolics and flavonoids content of the leaves aqueous extract of three varieties of Benth (Mean ± SEM; n = 3)
| Leaf extract | Phenolic content 1 | Flavonoid content 2 |
|---|---|---|
|
| 3.07 ± 0.28a | 1.39 ± 0.11b |
|
| 2.96 ± 0.21b | 1.94 ± 0.15a |
|
| 2.78 ± 0.24c | 1.35 ± 0.13c |
1mg gallic acid equivalent/g DW; 2mg rutin equivalent/g DW; Results are means of three replicates ± standard error. Means with the different letters are significantly different from each other at P < 0.05.
Fatty acid profile of microwave aqueous extract of three varieties of Benth (Mean ± SEM; n = 3)
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 28.21 ± 1.31a | 27.05 ± 3.50ab | 24.58 ± 0.54b |
|
| 2.29 ± 1.02 | 1.43 ± 0.26 | 1.05 ± 0.29 |
|
| 4.67 ± 0.34 | 4.64 ± 0.38 | 3.76 ± 0.57 |
|
| 18.83 ± 0.08 | 19.67 ± 0.85 | 17.68 ± 0.42 |
|
| 24.99 ± 0.80 | 28.73 ± 2.44 | 28.84 ± 0.20 |
|
| 21.01 ± 2.29ab | 18.50 ± 0.86b | 24.08 ± 0.21a |
|
| 32.88 ± 1.51 | 31.68 ± 3.88 | 28.34 ± 0.73 |
|
| 21.12 ± 0.98 | 21.09 ± 0.61 | 18.73 ± 0.53 |
|
| 21.01 ± 2.29ab | 18.50 ± 0.86b | 24.08 ± 0.21a |
|
| 24.99 ± 0.80 | 28.73 ± 2.44 | 28.84 ± 0.20 |
|
| 46.00 ± 2.81b | 47.23 ± 3.28b | 52.92 ± 4.25a |
|
| 1.19 ± 0.15 | 1.55 ± 0.06 | 1.20 ± 0.01 |
|
| 1.41 ± 0.13 | 1.57 ± 0.32 | 1.87 ± 0.05 |
1Total Saturated = sum of C16:0 + C18:0.
2Total Monoenes = sum of C16:1 + C18:1n-9.
3Total n-3PUFA = sum of C18:3n-3.
4Total n-6PUFA = sum of C18:2n-6.
5Total Polyunsaturated fatty acid = C18:2n-6+ C18:3n-3.
Values with different superscripts between rows differ significantly at P <0.05.
Figure 1ABTS radical cation-scavenging of three varieties of extracts ( , and ) and trolox at different concentrations. Each value represents mean ± SEM of three replicates.
Figure 2Nitric oxide scavenging activity of three varieties of extracts ( , and ) and vitamins at different concentrations. Each value represents mean ± SEM of three replicates.
The IC50 values of extracts and standards in ABTS and nitric oxide scavenging activities (Mean ± SEM; n = 3)
| Samples | IC 50 (μg/mL) | |
|---|---|---|
| ABTS radical scavenging activity | NO scavenging activity | |
|
| 399.02 ± 1.12c | 411.53 ± 1.65c |
|
| 424.57 ± 1.87b | 425.87 ± 1.52b |
|
| 448.20 ± 2.15a | 449.29 ± 2.03a |
| Vitamin C | - | 59.91 ± 3.42f |
| Vitamin E | - | 62.6 ± 2.62e |
| BHT | - | 118.73 ± 1.73d |
| Trolox | 187.47 ± 1.01d | - |
Means in the same column with the different superscripts are significantly different at P < 0.05.
Inhibition zones of aqueous leaf extracts of three varieties of against pathogenic bacteria at concentration of 300 μg/disc (Mean ± SEM; n = 3)
| Sample | Inhibition zone (cm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gram-positive bacteria | ||||
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.72 ± 0.11b | 0.65 ± 0.15c | 0.75 ± 0.13b | 0.55 ± 0.06b |
|
| 0.75 ± 0.23b | 0.70 ± 0.13b | 0.73 ± 0.25b | 0.50 ± 0.17b |
|
| 0.65 ± 0.46c | 0.55 ± 0.07d | 0.60 ± 0.16c | 0.40 ± 0.22c |
| Kanamycin | 1.15 ± 0.05a | 0.95 ± 0.03a | 1.02 ± 0.09a | 0.91 ± 0.05a |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.90 ± 0.15b | 0.40 ± 0.23b | 0.63 ± 0.07b | 0.60 ± 0.09bc |
|
| 0.85 ± 0.09c | 0.37 ± 0.17bc | 0.45 ± 0.15c | 0.65 ± 0.25b |
|
| 0.78 ± 0.12d | 0.30 ± 0.11c | 0.40 ± 0.19cd | 0.55 ± 0.33c |
| Kanamycin | 1.30 ± 0.03a | 0.92 ± 0.05a | 1.05 ± 0.05a | 1.20 ± 0.11a |
Means with different superscripts within column are significantly different (P < 0.05).