Literature DB >> 25761346

Left visual field attentional advantage in judging simultaneity and temporal order.

Nestor Matthews1, Leslie Welch2.   

Abstract

Dynamic environments often contain features that vary simultaneously as well as features that vary sequentially. In principle, the correspondingly distinct sensations of simultaneity and temporal order could arise from a single shared neural computation that involves differencing two arrival times. On the other hand, simultaneity judgments (SJs) and temporal order judgments (TOJs) have distinct informational requirements that could be optimized by distinct neural events. To explore overlap in the neural events mediating SJs and TOJs, the present experiments built on recent reports that SJ precision in the left visual field (LVF) exceeds that in the right visual field (RVF). Participants completed divided attention tasks requiring either SJs or TOJs to LVF or RVF targets. SJs exhibited a significant LVF advantage, as expected. TOJs also exhibited a significant LVF advantage. Specifically, simply repositioning targets from the LVF to the RVF generated mean TOJ threshold increases (temporal precision reductions) between 39% and 57%, an effect size equivalent to approximately two LVF detectors for each RVF detector. Control experiments indicated that this LVF advantage reflected the temporal resolution of visual attention, rather than lower-level flicker discrimination or masking. These findings constitute additional evidence for an LVF advantage in time-sensitive attentional tasks and further contradict our subjective experience of homogenous temporal precision across the visual field.
© 2015 ARVO.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention-based motion; motion perception; simultaneity; temporal order; temporal vision

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25761346     DOI: 10.1167/15.2.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  7 in total

1.  An fMRI study of visual hemifield integration and cerebral lateralization.

Authors:  Lars Strother; Zhiheng Zhou; Alexandra K Coros; Tutis Vilis
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Visual field asymmetries in numerosity processing.

Authors:  Ramakrishna Chakravarthi; Danai Papadaki; Jan Krajnik
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 2.157

3.  Temporal Order Judgements of Dynamic Gaze Stimuli Reveal a Postdictive Prioritisation of Averted Over Direct Shifts.

Authors:  Nicola Binetti; Charlotte Harrison; Isabelle Mareschal; Alan Johnston
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-07-17

4.  Adaptation to Skew Distortions of Natural Scenes and Retinal Specificity of Its Aftereffects.

Authors:  Selam W Habtegiorgis; Katharina Rifai; Markus Lappe; Siegfried Wahl
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-07-13

5.  Characterizing the in-out asymmetry in visual crowding.

Authors:  Ramakrishna Chakravarthi; Jirko Rubruck; Nikki Kipling; Alasdair D F Clarke
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  The whole is faster than its parts: evidence for temporally independent attention to distinct spatial locations.

Authors:  Andrew Clement; Nestor Matthews
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Motion perception in central field loss.

Authors:  Natela Shanidze; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 2.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.