Literature DB >> 25761280

Future path and tangent point models in the visual control of locomotion in curve driving.

Otto Lappi1.   

Abstract

Studying human behavior in the natural context of everyday visual tasks--including locomotor tasks such as driving--can reveal visual strategies or even suggest underlying visual mechanisms. This paper reviews empirical and theoretical work in the past 20 years (1994-2014) on the visual control of steering a vehicle along a winding path-one of the most comprehensively studied forms of visually guided locomotion in humans. The focus is on on-road studies of visual behavior and what they can reveal about the visual strategies in curve driving. Theoretical models and results from simulator studies are discussed where they have direct relevance to the interpretation of on-road data. For the past 20 years, the point of departure in studies of curve driving has been tangent point orientation, and tangent point models (models based on tracking the tangent point) have become established as the default account of how vision is used in curve negotiation. More recent studies have questioned the generality of the tangent point hypothesis, however, arguing that in addition to (or instead of) the tangent point, drivers target visual reference points on their future path. Ecological validity of real-world studies often comes at the cost of methodological challenges that make the data difficult to interpret in terms of underlying mechanisms, and the limitations of existing data and the complementary roles of real-world and laboratory studies are discussed.
© 2014 ARVO.

Entities:  

Keywords:  future path; locomotion; real driving; steering models; tangent point

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25761280     DOI: 10.1167/14.12.21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  18 in total

Review 1.  Driving with homonymous visual field loss: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Alex R Bowers
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.742

2.  When flow is not enough: evidence from a lane changing task.

Authors:  Xin Xu; Guy Wallis
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-08-07

3.  Drivers' Visual Behavior-Guided RRT Motion Planner for Autonomous On-Road Driving.

Authors:  Mingbo Du; Tao Mei; Huawei Liang; Jiajia Chen; Rulin Huang; Pan Zhao
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Task-Difficulty Homeostasis in Car Following Models: Experimental Validation Using Self-Paced Visual Occlusion.

Authors:  Jami Pekkanen; Otto Lappi; Teemu H Itkonen; Heikki Summala
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Trade-off between jerk and time headway as an indicator of driving style.

Authors:  Teemu H Itkonen; Jami Pekkanen; Otto Lappi; Iisakki Kosonen; Tapio Luttinen; Heikki Summala
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Systematic Observation of an Expert Driver's Gaze Strategy-An On-Road Case Study.

Authors:  Otto Lappi; Paavo Rinkkala; Jami Pekkanen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-04-27

7.  Greater cerebellar gray matter volume in car drivers: an exploratory voxel-based morphometry study.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Sakai; Takafumi Ando; Norihiro Sadato; Yuji Uchiyama
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  A link between attentional function, effective eye movements, and driving ability.

Authors:  Andrew K Mackenzie; Julie M Harris
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  A computational model for driver's cognitive state, visual perception and intermittent attention in a distracted car following task.

Authors:  Jami Pekkanen; Otto Lappi; Paavo Rinkkala; Samuel Tuhkanen; Roosa Frantsi; Heikki Summala
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Driver Gaze Behavior Is Different in Normal Curve Driving and when Looking at the Tangent Point.

Authors:  Teemu Itkonen; Jami Pekkanen; Otto Lappi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.