OBJECTIVE: This article describes the external audit measurements conducted in two UK centres implementing total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) and the results obtained. METHODS: Measurements of output, energy, beam flatness and symmetry at a standard distance (95 or 100 cm SSD) were performed using a parallel plate chamber in solid water. Similarly, output and energy measurements were also performed at the treatment plane for single and dual fields. Clinical simulations were carried out using thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLDs) and Gafchromic® film (International Specialty Products, Wayne, NJ) on an anthropomorphic phantom. RESULTS: Extended distance measurements confirmed that local values for the beam dosimetry at Centres A and B were within 2% for outputs and 1-mm agreement of the expected depth at which the dose is 50% of the maximum for the depth-dose curve in water (R50,D) value. Clinical simulation using TLDs) showed an agreement of -1.6% and -6.7% compared with the expected mean trunk dose for each centre, respectively, and a variation within 10% (±1 standard deviation) across the trunk. The film results confirmed that the delivery of the treatment technique at each audited centre complies with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer recommendations. CONCLUSION: This audit methodology has proven to be a successful way to confirm the agreement of dosimetric parameters for TSEBT treatments at both audited centres and could serve as the basis for an audit template to be used by other audit groups. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: TSEBT audits are not established in the UK owing to a limited number of centres carrying out the treatment technique. This article describes the audits performed at two UK centres prior to their clinical implementation.
OBJECTIVE: This article describes the external audit measurements conducted in two UK centres implementing total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) and the results obtained. METHODS: Measurements of output, energy, beam flatness and symmetry at a standard distance (95 or 100 cm SSD) were performed using a parallel plate chamber in solid water. Similarly, output and energy measurements were also performed at the treatment plane for single and dual fields. Clinical simulations were carried out using thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLDs) and Gafchromic® film (International Specialty Products, Wayne, NJ) on an anthropomorphic phantom. RESULTS: Extended distance measurements confirmed that local values for the beam dosimetry at Centres A and B were within 2% for outputs and 1-mm agreement of the expected depth at which the dose is 50% of the maximum for the depth-dose curve in water (R50,D) value. Clinical simulation using TLDs) showed an agreement of -1.6% and -6.7% compared with the expected mean trunk dose for each centre, respectively, and a variation within 10% (±1 standard deviation) across the trunk. The film results confirmed that the delivery of the treatment technique at each audited centre complies with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer recommendations. CONCLUSION: This audit methodology has proven to be a successful way to confirm the agreement of dosimetric parameters for TSEBT treatments at both audited centres and could serve as the basis for an audit template to be used by other audit groups. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: TSEBT audits are not established in the UK owing to a limited number of centres carrying out the treatment technique. This article describes the audits performed at two UK centres prior to their clinical implementation.
Authors: D I Thwaites; A R DuSautoy; T Jordan; M R McEwen; A Nisbet; A E Nahum; W G Pitchford Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2003-09-21 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: S Diamantopoulos; K Platoni; M Dilvoi; I Nazos; K Geropantas; G Maravelis; M Tolia; I Beli; E Efstathopoulos; P Pantelakos; G Panayiotakis; V Kouloulias Journal: Phys Med Date: 2010-10-14 Impact factor: 2.685
Authors: Glenn W Jones; Barry M Kacinski; Lynn D Wilson; Rein Willemze; Margaret Spittle; Gerda Hohenberg; Leonore Handl-Zeller; Franz Trautinger; Robert Knobler Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Sarah Misson-Yates; Marium Naeem; Isabel Palmer; Eleanor Holden; Owen Hedley; Mark McGovern; Stephen Morris; Anthony G Greener Journal: BJR Open Date: 2019-07-20