Barney S Graham1, Donna M Ambrosino. 1. aVaccine Research Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda bClearPath Vaccines Company (CVC), Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We describe the history of passive immunization to provide context for the series of articles to follow. The history of passive immunization with antibodies to prevent or treat infectious diseases is a story of different eras. There was an extraordinary era of discovery and clinical implementation before the chemical nature of antibodies was even known. This empirical process provided the resources and reagents used to describe and characterize humoral immunity, better define the chemical properties and structure of antibodies, and extend the clinical use of immunoglobulin products to treat or prevent multiple viral and bacterial diseases over the ensuing several decades. The next distinct era came with the discovery of processes to produce monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), and development of more specific therapies. Interestingly, mAb technology resulted in many products to treat autoimmune and allergic diseases, but only one common infectious disease, respiratory syncytial virus, and only in a restricted population of high-risk infants. RECENT FINDINGS: The current era began in 2003 with a series of publications demonstrating processes for rapidly producing human mAbs. SUMMARY: This technology combined with new sequencing technology, advances in structural biology, atomic-level molecular design, and increased capacity for synthetic biology, promises new opportunities to apply passive immunization to the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We describe the history of passive immunization to provide context for the series of articles to follow. The history of passive immunization with antibodies to prevent or treat infectious diseases is a story of different eras. There was an extraordinary era of discovery and clinical implementation before the chemical nature of antibodies was even known. This empirical process provided the resources and reagents used to describe and characterize humoral immunity, better define the chemical properties and structure of antibodies, and extend the clinical use of immunoglobulin products to treat or prevent multiple viral and bacterial diseases over the ensuing several decades. The next distinct era came with the discovery of processes to produce monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), and development of more specific therapies. Interestingly, mAb technology resulted in many products to treat autoimmune and allergic diseases, but only one common infectious disease, respiratory syncytial virus, and only in a restricted population of high-risk infants. RECENT FINDINGS: The current era began in 2003 with a series of publications demonstrating processes for rapidly producing human mAbs. SUMMARY: This technology combined with new sequencing technology, advances in structural biology, atomic-level molecular design, and increased capacity for synthetic biology, promises new opportunities to apply passive immunization to the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases.
Authors: N Lonberg; L D Taylor; F A Harding; M Trounstine; K M Higgins; S R Schramm; C C Kuo; R Mashayekh; K Wymore; J G McCabe Journal: Nature Date: 1994-04-28 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Jens Wrammert; Kenneth Smith; Joe Miller; William A Langley; Kenneth Kokko; Christian Larsen; Nai-Ying Zheng; Israel Mays; Lori Garman; Christina Helms; Judith James; Gillian M Air; J Donald Capra; Rafi Ahmed; Patrick C Wilson Journal: Nature Date: 2008-04-30 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Burton E Barnett; Ryan P Staupe; Pamela M Odorizzi; Olesya Palko; Vesselin T Tomov; Alison E Mahan; Bronwyn Gunn; Diana Chen; Michael A Paley; Galit Alter; Steven L Reiner; Georg M Lauer; John R Teijaro; E John Wherry Journal: J Immunol Date: 2016-07-18 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Yan Q Xiong; Angeles Estellés; L Li; W Abdelhady; R Gonzales; Arnold S Bayer; Edgar Tenorio; Anton Leighton; Stefan Ryser; Lawrence M Kauvar Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-09-22 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Lingshu Wang; Wei Shi; James D Chappell; M Gordon Joyce; Yi Zhang; Masaru Kanekiyo; Michelle M Becker; Neeltje van Doremalen; Robert Fischer; Nianshuang Wang; Kizzmekia S Corbett; Misook Choe; Rosemarie D Mason; Joseph G Van Galen; Tongqing Zhou; Kevin O Saunders; Kathleen M Tatti; Lia M Haynes; Peter D Kwong; Kayvon Modjarrad; Wing-Pui Kong; Jason S McLellan; Mark R Denison; Vincent J Munster; John R Mascola; Barney S Graham Journal: J Virol Date: 2018-04-27 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Tongqing Zhou; I-Ting Teng; Adam S Olia; Gabriele Cerutti; Jason Gorman; Alexandra Nazzari; Wei Shi; Yaroslav Tsybovsky; Lingshu Wang; Shuishu Wang; Baoshan Zhang; Yi Zhang; Phinikoula S Katsamba; Yuliya Petrova; Bailey B Banach; Ahmed S Fahad; Lihong Liu; Sheila N Lopez Acevedo; Bharat Madan; Matheus Olivera de Souza; Xiaoli Pan; Pengfei Wang; Jacy R Wolfe; Michael Yin; David D Ho; Emily Phung; Anthony DiPiazza; Lauren Chang; Olubukula Abiona; Kizzmekia S Corbett; Brandon J DeKosky; Barney S Graham; John R Mascola; John Misasi; Tracy Ruckwardt; Nancy J Sullivan; Lawrence Shapiro; Peter D Kwong Journal: SSRN Date: 2020-07-21
Authors: Rajeev Gautam; Yoshiaki Nishimura; Amarendra Pegu; Martha C Nason; Florian Klein; Anna Gazumyan; Jovana Golijanin; Alicia Buckler-White; Reza Sadjadpour; Keyun Wang; Zachary Mankoff; Stephen D Schmidt; Jeffrey D Lifson; John R Mascola; Michel C Nussenzweig; Malcolm A Martin Journal: Nature Date: 2016-04-27 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: M Asokan; R S Rudicell; M Louder; K McKee; S O'Dell; G Stewart-Jones; K Wang; L Xu; X Chen; M Choe; G Chuang; I S Georgiev; M G Joyce; T Kirys; S Ko; A Pegu; W Shi; J P Todd; Z Yang; R T Bailer; S Rao; P D Kwong; G J Nabel; J R Mascola Journal: J Virol Date: 2015-10-07 Impact factor: 5.103