Literature DB >> 25760931

Antibody engineering for increased potency, breadth and half-life.

Stuart A Sievers1, Louise Scharf, Anthony P West, Pamela J Bjorkman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review highlights recent developments in HIV-1 antibody engineering and discusses the effects of increased polyreactivity on serum half-lives of engineered antibodies. RECENT
FINDINGS: Recent studies have uncovered a wealth of information about the relationship between the sequences and efficacies of anti-HIV-1 antibodies through a combination of bioinformatics, structural characterization and in vivo studies. This knowledge has stimulated efforts to enhance antibody breadth and potency for therapeutic use. Although some engineered antibodies have shown increased polyreactivity and short half-lives, promising efforts are circumventing these problems.
SUMMARY: Antibodies are desirable as therapeutics due to their ability to recognize targets with both specificity and high affinity. Furthermore, the ability of antibodies to stimulate Fc-mediated effector functions can increase their utility. Thus, mAbs have become central to strategies for the treatment of various diseases. Using both targeted and library-based approaches, antibodies can be engineered to improve their therapeutic properties. This article will discuss recent antibody engineering efforts to improve the breadth and potency of anti-HIV-1 antibodies. The polyreactivity of engineered HIV-1 bNAbs and the effect on serum half-life will be explored along with strategies to overcome problems introduced by engineering antibodies. Finally, advances in creating bispecific anti-HIV-1 reagents are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25760931      PMCID: PMC4465343          DOI: 10.1097/COH.0000000000000148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin HIV AIDS        ISSN: 1746-630X            Impact factor:   4.283


INTRODUCTION

HIV-1 effectively evades antibody-mediated responses due to rapid mutation of gp120 and gp41, the two glycoproteins that comprise the envelope (Env) spike (Fig. 1) [1,2,4], and structural features that enable Env to hide conserved epitopes, including a shield of host-derived carbohydrates [5], conformational masking [6], steric occlusion [7-10] and flexible variable loops [8,11]. The low number and density of envelope spikes on HIV-1 virions may also contribute to the ability of HIV-1 to evade antibodies by preventing most IgGs from binding simultaneously with both Fabs [12,13]. These features usually result in production of strain-specific antibodies. However, recent advances in single-cell cloning techniques have led to the identification of extremely potent, broadly neutralizing HIV-1 IgG antibodies (bNAbs) from infected donors [14-16]. When delivered passively in animal models of HIV-1 infection, anti-HIV-1 bNAbs can prevent [17-20] or suppress infection [21-24], prompting efforts to improve their potency and/or breadth in order to increase their efficacy as therapeutics. Characterization of bNAbs through structural and bioinformatic approaches has identified epitopes on HIV-1 Env, including the gp120 V1V2 and V3 loops, the CD4-binding site (CD4bs), the gp41 membrane proximal external region (MPER) and sites bridging gp120 and gp41 (Fig. 1) [25-30].
FIGURE 1

Location of bNAb epitopes on HIV-1 Env trimer. The approximate location of epitopes (shown only once per trimer) are highlighted on a surface representation of Env derived from electron microscopy, structure EMD-5782 [1]: CD4-binding site Ab epitope (red), V1/V2 loop/Asn160 Ab epitope (green), V3 loop/Asn332 Ab epitope (blue), 8ANC195 epitope (yellow), 35O22 epitope (cyan), PGT151 epitope (pink), MPER epitope (gray). N-linked glycans shown as grey sticks were added to all potential N-linked glycosylation sites present in the coordinates for BG505 SOSIP Env (PDB 4NCO) [2] using Glyprot [3]. Representative bNAbs targeting each epitope are listed.

Location of bNAb epitopes on HIV-1 Env trimer. The approximate location of epitopes (shown only once per trimer) are highlighted on a surface representation of Env derived from electron microscopy, structure EMD-5782 [1]: CD4-binding site Ab epitope (red), V1/V2 loop/Asn160 Ab epitope (green), V3 loop/Asn332 Ab epitope (blue), 8ANC195 epitope (yellow), 35O22 epitope (cyan), PGT151 epitope (pink), MPER epitope (gray). N-linked glycans shown as grey sticks were added to all potential N-linked glycosylation sites present in the coordinates for BG505 SOSIP Env (PDB 4NCO) [2] using Glyprot [3]. Representative bNAbs targeting each epitope are listed. This review will discuss engineering efforts to create more potent anti-HIV-1 antibodies, using both traditional IgG and modified architectures. We also consider how engineering efforts can result in polyreactivity, the ability of an antibody to bind to more than one antigen, which can lead to autoreactivity and/or decreased in vivo half-life. no caption available

ENGINEERING HIV-1 ANTIBODIES

Techniques to improve IgG affinities [31,32], broaden their specificity to related antigens [33-35] and improve their expression and solubility [32] include computational techniques [36-39] and directed mutagenesis to introduce diversity coupled with selection techniques, for example phage, yeast, mRNA and ribosome display [32]. Early library-based engineering efforts to improve HIV-1 antibodies involved b12, one of the first HIV-1 bNAbs. The affinity of b12 was enhanced by nearly 400-fold by selecting for gp120 binding from libraries of phage-displayed mutants in complementarity-determining regions (CDRs) [40]. These studies demonstrated that increasing affinity through in-vitro evolution could also increase breadth [41]. The engineering of the HIV-1 m9 antibody used a modified approach termed sequential antigen planning to improve both affinity and breadth: a single-chain variable fragment (scFv) library of a CD4-induced (CD4i) antibody was screened against sequentially changing antigens, ultimately identifying m9 [42]. Although antibodies recently isolated from donors are more promising therapeutically than earlier bNAbs [43,44], library-based methods may be important to improve the new generation of antibodies, as they can introduce beneficial changes that might not be anticipated from inspection of antibody–antigen complex structures. However, the large number of HIV-1 strains, including the diversity of the viral swarm within a single infected individual, makes it difficult to select for antibodies that maintain breadth across viral strains while increasing binding to one or a few Env specificities. Of relevance to prospects for improving anti-HIV-1 antibodies is the fact that bNAbs isolated from HIV-1 infected individuals, especially the most potent, recently discovered bNAbs, often show high levels of somatic hypermutation [43,44,45]. Somatic mutations in HIV-1 bNAbs can include insertions/deletions in framework regions (FWRs) and the more variable CDRs. Taken together, the VH domain alone can include 40–100 nucleotide mutations [14,45,46-51]. Many of the FWR mutations, even those not directly contacting antigen, appear to be important for bNAb function, as reverting mutated noninteracting FWR residues to germline residues resulted in reduced neutralization potency and breadth [45]. Efforts to identify a minimal set of FWR mutations required for bNAbs VRC01 and 10E8 showed that it was possible to revert up to 78% of VRC01 and up to 89% of 10E8 FWR mutations to germline residues while maintaining much of the original potency and breadth [52]. Interestingly, reverting 50% of the light chain FWR mutations to germline improved the potency of VRC01 [52]. Thus, although FWR mutations can contribute antigen contacts in addition to stabilizing CDR conformations and allowing conformational flexibility [45], not all FWR mutations are required for bNAb potency and breadth, and some may even be deleterious. Some of the most potent antibodies against HIV-1 that are the focus of engineering efforts are VRC01-class antibodies, which target the CD4bs using a VH1-2∗02 derived heavy chain to mimic CD4 recognition of gp120 [8,15,16,46,53,54▪▪]. A structure-based approach was taken to improve NIH45-46 [46], a more potent clonal variant of VRC01 [15]. Structural and mutagenesis studies demonstrated that a four-residue insertion within the NIH45-46 CDRH3 loop accounted for its increased potency [55]. Although VRC01-like bNAbs effectively mimic CD4 [48], both VRC01 and NIH45-46 fail to fill a hydrophobic pocket within gp120 to mimic the burying of a hydrophobic CD4 residue, Phe43CD4. Mutants were created by substituting the Phe43CD4-equivalent residue in NIH45-46, Gly54NIH45-46, and improved potencies were found for Trp, Phe, Tyr and His substitutions [55]. The most promising mutant, NIH45-46G54W, showed an overall 10-fold increase in neutralization potency and neutralized some NIH45-46 resistant strains [55]. Residue 54 is a Trp in some VRC01-related bNAbs that are less potent than VRC01 or NIH45-46, for example VRC03 [48], demonstrating that a Gly-to-Trp substitution at position 54 is a possible somatic mutation in this bNAb lineage, but that maximal increased potency from this substitution requires other features of a VRC01-like bNAb, most likely the CDRH3 loop insertion. A follow-up study [56] used structure-based design to reduce available routes of HIV-1 escape from antibody pressure. Bioinformatic analysis identified gp120 sequence correlates for resistance to VRC01-class antibodies by noting that variations at highly conserved gp120 residues 279gp120–280gp120 and 458gp120–459gp120 (the ‘NNGG’ motif, named for the Asn and Gly residues at these positions) lead to resistance [53]; these predictions were experimentally verified in vitro[53] and in HIV-1 infected humanized mice [22]. To counteract the effects of gp120 escape mutations, rational design was used to create two new mutants: 45–46m2 (S28YLC), which introduces contacts with an Asn276gp120-linked glycan, as seen in VRC01/gp120 complexes, but not NIH45–46/gp120 complexes [48,55], and 45–46m7 (W47 VHC), which removes steric clashes with gp120 substitutions in the GG motif [56]. 45–46m2 neutralized nearly 96% of viruses, an improvement over other CD4bs bNAbs, which typically neutralize nearly 90% of strains. In vivo experiments demonstrated that viral escapes were no longer found in the GG motif when HIV-1 infected animals were treated with 45–46m2/45–46m7, and a resulting A281Tgp120 escape variant had reduced viral fitness [56]. These studies demonstrate that even highly somatically mutated bNAbs are not necessarily optimal as isolated from donors, and that even if it is impossible to completely prevent HIV-1 escape from bNAbs, it might be possible to drive the evolution of viruses with reduced fitness that could be more easily combated by host defense mechanisms. A similar effort to improve a bNAb is represented by development of a more potent variant of a VRC01-class antibody that was isolated from the VRC01/NIH45–46 donor [54▪▪]. First, 454 pyrosequencing of B cell antibody gene transcripts allowed identification of a heavy chain clonal variant that was closely related to NIH45–46 and contained the same four-residue CDRH3 insert. When combined with the VRC01 light chain, the new bNAb, VRC07, was about two-fold more potent than VRC01. Although not antibody engineering per se, this result illustrates that deeper searching of bNAb donor repertoires can identify more potent clonal relatives; other examples include variants of PGT121 [47,57,58], PGT141 [59] and 8ANC195 [26]. Next, all 20 amino acids were evaluated at VRC07 heavy chain position 54. Similar to results for NIH45–46 Gly54HC mutants [55], substitution of VRC07 Gly54 to larger residues, including Trp, Tyr, Phe and His, increased neutralization potency and breadth, but substitutions for large aromatic residues resulted in polyreactive recognition of non-HIV-1 antigens [54▪▪]. A Gly54His substitution showed the least increase in polyreactivity while still increasing potency. The antibody light chain was also shortened to address observations that the V5 loop of gp120 interferes with the binding of VRC01-like antibodies [60]. On the basis of results from a screen of light chain truncations and modifications, a two-residue N-terminal truncation as well as a Val3SerLC mutation was selected [54▪▪]. For in vivo experiments, mutations in the Fc region to improve plasma half-life through enhanced binding to FcRn (M428L/N434S, the ‘LS’ mutant [61]) were introduced. Additional framework mutation reversions and solubility-enhancing mutations were investigated, but the antibody selected after in vivo half-life determinations, VRC07-523-LS, did not contain these mutations. VRC07-523 and VRC07-523-LS were five- to eight-fold more potent than VRC01 and neutralized 96% of tested HIV-1 strains in vitro. Viral challenge experiments in macaques verified that the increased in vitro potency correlated with improved protection from infection in vivo[54▪▪]. Taken together, the NIH45-46 and VRC07 examples illustrate the potential to improve the activity of VRC01-class bNAbs by filling the hydrophobic Phe43CD4 pocket on gp120. In a different approach, features of clonally related antibodies with similar specificities can sometimes be combined into one antibody to increase breadth and/or potency. For example, a chimeric version of glycan-dependent bNAbs 10-1074 and PGT121 [14,57] was constructed by grafting five PGT121 heavy chain residues identified as contacting a complex-type N-linked glycan into the 10-1074 heavy chain [57]. The chimera (10-1074GM) exhibited improved potency and neutralized some viral strains resistant to wildtype 10-1074. In the case of PG9 and PG16, members of a family of bNAbs targeting the V1V2 loop and glycans at positions Asn160gp120 and Asn176gp120[14], three PG16LC residues that contact a complex or hybrid-type N-glycan at Asn176gp120 were grafted onto LCPG9 to create PG9-PG16-RSH [62]. The resulting chimeric antibody had improved potency compared with PG9 [62]. In both examples, grafting residues contacting complex-type N-glycans onto a family member that favors a high-mannose N-glycan at the same Env position seemed to allow the antibody to accommodate different types of glycoforms. In another example, the neutralization potency of the MPER antibody 4E10 was improved nearly two-fold by engineering its CDRH3 to mimic lipid-binding properties observed for 10E8 [63].

ENGINEERING ANTIBODIES CAN AFFECT POLYREACTIVITY AND IN VIVO HALF-LIFE

Antibodies raised against foreign antigens such as HIV-1 Env can be polyreactive or autoreactive, that is they can bind to more than one antigen (polyreactivity) and/or to self proteins (autoreactivity) [64-66]. Although B cells with autoreactive and polyreactive B cell receptors are largely removed as they pass through tolerance checkpoints [67,68], a fraction of mature B cells remain polyreactive or autoreactive in healthy individuals [69]. Polyreactive antibodies produced by these cells may be generally useful for fighting bacterial infection and enhancing the phagocytosis of apoptotic cells [70,71]. Indeed, some bacterial and viral infections are associated with higher serum levels of autoreactive and polyreactive antibodies [65]. The presence of autoreactive/polyreactive antibodies has been associated with HIV-1 infection for more than 25 years [72-74]. Polyreactivity was first characterized in detail for the 4E10 and 2F5 MPER bNAbs [75]. These bNAbs were described as interacting with cardiolipin, a negatively charged mitochondrial phospholipid [75-80]. Further studies confirmed that binding of 2F5 and 4E10 to HIV-1 Env is enhanced by the presence of the host-derived viral membrane, which would include negatively charged phospholipids [81]. Recent studies have identified human proteins, kynureninase, type 1 inositol trisphosphate receptor and splicing factor 3b subunit 3 as potential self-antigens recognized by 2F5 and 4E10 [82,83]. Another MPER antibody, 10E8, does not exhibit polyreactivity in standard assays [84], yet binds tightly to a self-antigen, FAM84A (family with sequence similarity 84, member A) [85▪▪]. In a comprehensive study, a majority of more than 200 anti-HIV-1 Env antibodies isolated from HIV-1 infected donors exhibited binding to both self and nonself antigens, with anti-gp41 antibodies showing the most polyreactivity, particularly against lipid antigens [86,87]. In general, broadly neutralizing anti-HIV-1 antibodies exhibit a higher frequency of polyreactivity than nonneutralizing antibodies [85▪▪]. Polyreactivity may not necessarily be a problem for anti-HIV-1 antibodies, especially as it is a common property of donor-derived bNAbs; however, a correlation between increased polyreactivity and an increased rate of antibody clearance in vivo has been observed for IgGs [88]. IgG half-lives are normally extended beyond other serum proteins due to interactions with FcRn, the receptor that protects serum IgG from a default degradative pathway in vascular endothelial cells [89,90]. However, mutations known to increase the half-life of nonpolyreactive IgGs through enhanced interactions with FcRn, such as the LS mutation [61] that was introduced into VRC01 and VRC07–523 [54▪▪,91], do not generally improve the half-lives of polyreactive IgGs. This is likely because increased FcRn function cannot compensate for IgG loss due to off-target binding, which absorbs polyreactive IgGs and leads to their rapid clearance [88]. In antibody engineering efforts, it has been observed that improving the breadth and potency of antibodies can lead to increased polyreactivity and/or reduced solubility and increased aggregation propensity [54▪▪,92–94]; in studies described above, many of the Gly54HC substitutions into NIH45–46 and VRC07 derivatives resulted in increased polyreactivity and decreased in vivo half-lives [54▪▪,94]. In addition, the more potent version of 10–1074, 10–1074GM, exhibited increased polyreactivity compared with its PGT121 and 10–1074 parents (H. Mouquet, L. Scharf, P.J. Bjorkman and M.C. Nussenzweig, unpublished data). Strategies being used to improve properties such as poor solubility and aggregation profiles that could lead to polyreactivity include switching the IgG isotype, inserting N-linked glycosylation sites, and making targeted mutations to reduce surface-exposed hydrophobic residues [92-97]. For example, in the engineering of VRC07-523, variants such as VRC07-G54W not only showed increased breadth and potency, but also polyreactivity and poor pharmacokinetics [54▪▪]. Similar characteristics were observed for NIH45–46G54W[94]. In both cases, a histidine substitution (G54H) reduced polyreactivity [54▪▪,94]. Similarly, several mutations intended to eliminate clashes with the gp120 V5 loop resulted in VRC07 variants with increased polyreactivity, but mutations were identified that yielded a variant exhibiting a favorable pharmacokinetic profile [54▪▪]. In another study, a structure-based approach guided by cataloguing variations in solubility in clonal relatives of 10E8 was used to improve the solubility of 10E8 nearly 10-fold while maintaining comparable potency, an important step towards making this antibody useful clinically [98].

BISPECIFIC REAGENTS

In addition to traditional IgG architectures (Fig. 2a), other scaffolds have been used to achieve bispecific recognition. Small molecules can be conjugated to IgGs to create bifunctional reagents (Fig. 2b); for example conjugating cholesterol to the light chains of the anti-MPER bNAbs 2F5 and D5 enhanced their potencies through cholesterol-mediated interactions with the viral membrane [99]. In another study, a small-molecule inhibitor of viral entry, aplaviroc, was conjugated to the Fc to enhance neutralization potency [100].
FIGURE 2

Architectures of bispecific anti-HIV-1 reagents. (a) Domain nomenclature for IgG. (b) Conjugate of small molecule antiretroviral aplaviroc with an IgG. (c) Fusion of CD4 D1-D2 with CD4i scFv 17b. (d) Reagent 2Dm2m constructed from CD4-mimetic mD1.22 and m36 single domain antibody. (e) The CrossMab technology allows for specific heavy chain heterodimerization using ‘knob-into-hole’ mutations to combine heavy chains from two IgGs, A and B. Domain exchange of CH1 with CL from the second IgG, labeled CH1B and CLB, ensure unique light chain pairing. (f) Dual-variable domain IgG that contains a second set of VH/VL domains. The two variable domains from a second antibody, labeled VHB and VLB, are added N-terminally to the variable domains of the first IgG, VHA and VLA. (g) 16-Fc, CD4 and CCR5 mimetic peptides are attached to an Fc. (h) PG9/PG16-iMab, containing scFvs attached to anti-CD4 antibody ibalizumab. CH1–3, the heavy chain constant domains; CL, light chain constant domain; VH, variable heavy chain domain; VL, variable light chain domain.

Architectures of bispecific anti-HIV-1 reagents. (a) Domain nomenclature for IgG. (b) Conjugate of small molecule antiretroviral aplaviroc with an IgG. (c) Fusion of CD4 D1-D2 with CD4i scFv 17b. (d) Reagent 2Dm2m constructed from CD4-mimetic mD1.22 and m36 single domain antibody. (e) The CrossMab technology allows for specific heavy chain heterodimerization using ‘knob-into-hole’ mutations to combine heavy chains from two IgGs, A and B. Domain exchange of CH1 with CL from the second IgG, labeled CH1B and CLB, ensure unique light chain pairing. (f) Dual-variable domain IgG that contains a second set of VH/VL domains. The two variable domains from a second antibody, labeled VHB and VLB, are added N-terminally to the variable domains of the first IgG, VHA and VLA. (g) 16-Fc, CD4 and CCR5 mimetic peptides are attached to an Fc. (h) PG9/PG16-iMab, containing scFvs attached to anti-CD4 antibody ibalizumab. CH1–3, the heavy chain constant domains; CL, light chain constant domain; VH, variable heavy chain domain; VL, variable light chain domain. An early example of a bispecific anti-HIV-1 reagent fused the gp120-binding domains of CD4 to an scFv version of a CD4i antibody. CD4i antibodies recognize the conserved coreceptor-binding site on gp120 after it is exposed as a result of CD4 binding [101]. As IgGs, CD4i antibodies exhibit limited neutralization potencies because of steric constraints when gp120 is bound to CD4 on the target cell [7]. The broadly neutralizing reagent sCD4-17b was created by fusing CD4 to the variable regions of a CD4i antibody, 17b, thereby solving the steric problem because the epitope was exposed by CD4 binding when the virion was not bound to the target cell (Fig. 2c) [101]. The CD4-17b reagent was recently expressed in a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) format on T cells to target and kill HIV-1-infected cells [102]. Later versions of CD4-CD4i reagents used an IgG architecture by N-terminally fusing CD4 to the Fabs of CD4i antibodies [103]. Despite containing only two CD4 moieties, the IgG-based CD4-CD4i reagents showed increased potencies compared with CD4-IgG2 (PRO542), a tetravalent CD4-Fc fusion protein [104]. A more recent reagent of this class combined a CD4 variant with m36, a CD4i single variable domain selected against different HIV-1 envelope proteins (Fig. 2d) [105,106]. Bispecific IgGs containing variable regions from two different IgGs have been produced using the crossMab platform in which heavy chain heterodimerization occurs using a ‘knob-into-hole’ Fc architecture and VH and VL domains are swapped in one half of the reagent to ensure proper heavy chain–light chain pairing [107] (Fig. 2e). Other architectures, such as dual variable domain constructs, attach a second Ig variable domain N-terminal to an IgG (Fig. 2f). A promising reagent of this class was created from bNAbs against gp120 and gp41 [108]. Another potent chimeric reagent was constructed as an Fc fusion with CD4- and coreceptor-mimetic peptides attached to the Fc, thus targeting both the receptor and coreceptor sites on HIV-1 Env (Fig. 2g) [109]. Bispecific reagents generally function by binding of one or the other Env-targeting component at a time. Simultaneous binding of both components of bispecific reagents to single Env trimers was recently shown to result in synergistic in vitro neutralization improvements of two to three orders of magnitude [13], suggesting a promising strategy for achieving potency, breadth and resistance to viral mutations. Synergistic neutralization resulting in extremely high in vitro potencies was also observed for reagents combining anti-Env and antihost specificities (see Ho and Markowitz, this issue). For example, attaching the scFv of PG9 or PG16 to the N-terminus of ibalizumab (anti-CD4) yielded synergistic reagents, PG9-iMab and PG16-iMab, of exceptional potency that neutralized 100% of a 118-virus panel, with the majority of IC50s less than 0.01 μg/ml (Fig. 2h) [110▪▪]. Another broad and potent bispecific reagent, iMabm36, joined m36 with ibalizumab [111]. This reagent neutralized 96% of a 118-member multiclade pseudovirus panel at a concentration of 10 μg/ml.

CONCLUSION

Although an effective HIV-1 vaccine remains an elusive goal, newly discovered potent HIV-1 bNAbs and advances in engineering antibodies offer possibilities for improved passive delivery strategies to prevent or treat HIV-1. More potent bNAbs could be used therapeutically at a lower concentration and thus reduce cost and/or production time, increase the number of patients being treated and lower the potential for immunogenicity or other side effects related to bNAb administration. There also remains a need to create reagents to combat viral mutation and the natural sequence diversity of HIV-1, which may be possible by identifying common pathways of viral escape and then using structure-based design to engineer resistance to these pathways. Library-based strategies designed to enhance affinity can also lead to increased breadth and block escape. Bispecific reagents and chemically conjugated reagents offer other ways to target multiple sites to prevent viral escape strategies and combat HIV-1 diversity. Although increased polyreactivity associated with some improved bNAbs may not necessarily be dangerous, polyreactivity correlates with shortened plasma half-life and represents an indicator that a reagent needs to be optimized to improve its biophysical and pharmacokinetic properties. Recent successes in creating bispecific, conjugate and engineered antibody reagents with minimal polyreactivity may be important therapeutically, particularly if gene therapy strategies, such as vector-mediated gene transfer (see Balasz and Baltimore, this issue) [112], are used to deliver antibodies and antibody-like reagents.

Acknowledgements

We thank Sonal N. Patel for help with figure preparation.

Financial support and sponsorship

This work was supported by a Collaboration for AIDS Vaccine Discovery (CAVD) grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (Grant ID: 1040753 to P.J.B.), National Institutes of Health grant HIVRAD P01 AI100148 (P.J.B.) and award number DP1OD006961 (to P.J.B.), the American Cancer Society (Grant PF-13-076-01-MPC to L.S.), California HIV/AIDS Research Program (CHRP grant F12-CT-214 to S.A.S.).

Conflicts of interest

A.P. West and P.J. Bjorkman have patent applications pending on improving CD4-binding site antibodies. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES AND RECOMMENDED READING

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as: ▪ of special interest ▪▪ of outstanding interest
  109 in total

1.  Identification and characterization of conserved and variable regions in the envelope gene of HTLV-III/LAV, the retrovirus of AIDS.

Authors:  B R Starcich; B H Hahn; G M Shaw; P D McNeely; S Modrow; H Wolf; E S Parks; W P Parks; S F Josephs; R C Gallo
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1986-06-06       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Improving the solubility of anti-LINGO-1 monoclonal antibody Li33 by isotype switching and targeted mutagenesis.

Authors:  R Blake Pepinsky; Laura Silvian; Steven A Berkowitz; Graham Farrington; Alexey Lugovskoy; Lee Walus; John Eldredge; Allan Capili; Sha Mi; Christilyn Graff; Ellen Garber
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Aggregation-resistant domain antibodies engineered with charged mutations near the edges of the complementarity-determining regions.

Authors:  Joseph M Perchiacca; Ali Reza A Ladiwala; Moumita Bhattacharya; Peter M Tessier
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 1.650

4.  Somatic mutations of the immunoglobulin framework are generally required for broad and potent HIV-1 neutralization.

Authors:  Florian Klein; Ron Diskin; Johannes F Scheid; Christian Gaebler; Hugo Mouquet; Ivelin S Georgiev; Marie Pancera; Tongqing Zhou; Reha-Baris Incesu; Brooks Zhongzheng Fu; Priyanthi N P Gnanapragasam; Thiago Y Oliveira; Michael S Seaman; Peter D Kwong; Pamela J Bjorkman; Michel C Nussenzweig
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Antibodies VRC01 and 10E8 neutralize HIV-1 with high breadth and potency even with Ig-framework regions substantially reverted to germline.

Authors:  Ivelin S Georgiev; Rebecca S Rudicell; Kevin O Saunders; Wei Shi; Tatsiana Kirys; Krisha McKee; Sijy O'Dell; Gwo-Yu Chuang; Zhi-Yong Yang; Gilad Ofek; Mark Connors; John R Mascola; Gary J Nabel; Peter D Kwong
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  Polyreactivity and autoreactivity among HIV-1 antibodies.

Authors:  Mengfei Liu; Guang Yang; Kevin Wiehe; Nathan I Nicely; Nathan A Vandergrift; Wes Rountree; Mattia Bonsignori; S Munir Alam; Jingyun Gao; Barton F Haynes; Garnett Kelsoe
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 5.103

7.  Access of antibody molecules to the conserved coreceptor binding site on glycoprotein gp120 is sterically restricted on primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1.

Authors:  Aran F Labrijn; Pascal Poignard; Aarti Raja; Michael B Zwick; Karla Delgado; Michael Franti; James Binley; Veronique Vivona; Christoph Grundner; Chih-Chin Huang; Miro Venturi; Christos J Petropoulos; Terri Wrin; Dimiter S Dimitrov; James Robinson; Peter D Kwong; Richard T Wyatt; Joseph Sodroski; Dennis R Burton
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.103

8.  Enhanced antibody half-life improves in vivo activity.

Authors:  Jonathan Zalevsky; Aaron K Chamberlain; Holly M Horton; Sher Karki; Irene W L Leung; Thomas J Sproule; Greg A Lazar; Derry C Roopenian; John R Desjarlais
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-01-17       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  Structural basis for diverse N-glycan recognition by HIV-1-neutralizing V1-V2-directed antibody PG16.

Authors:  Marie Pancera; Syed Shahzad-Ul-Hussan; Nicole A Doria-Rose; Jason S McLellan; Robert T Bailer; Kaifan Dai; Sandra Loesgen; Mark K Louder; Ryan P Staupe; Yongping Yang; Baoshan Zhang; Robert Parks; Joshua Eudailey; Krissey E Lloyd; Julie Blinn; S Munir Alam; Barton F Haynes; Mohammed N Amin; Lai-Xi Wang; Dennis R Burton; Wayne C Koff; Gary J Nabel; John R Mascola; Carole A Bewley; Peter D Kwong
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 15.369

10.  Increasing the potency and breadth of an HIV antibody by using structure-based rational design.

Authors:  Ron Diskin; Johannes F Scheid; Paola M Marcovecchio; Anthony P West; Florian Klein; Han Gao; Priyanthi N P Gnanapragasam; Alexander Abadir; Michael S Seaman; Michel C Nussenzweig; Pamela J Bjorkman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  27 in total

1.  Non-Antiretroviral Microbicides for HIV Prevention.

Authors:  Yanille Scott; Charlene S Dezzutti
Journal:  AIDS Rev       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  A Universal CAR-NK Cell Targeting Various Epitopes of HIV-1 gp160.

Authors:  Rebecca M Lim; Liang Rong; Anjie Zhen; Jianming Xie
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 5.100

Review 3.  Pharmacokinetic de-risking tools for selection of monoclonal antibody lead candidates.

Authors:  Miroslav Dostalek; Thomayant Prueksaritanont; Robert F Kelley
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 5.857

4.  Identification of a CD4-Binding-Site Antibody to HIV that Evolved Near-Pan Neutralization Breadth.

Authors:  Jinghe Huang; Byong H Kang; Elise Ishida; Tongqing Zhou; Trevor Griesman; Zizhang Sheng; Fan Wu; Nicole A Doria-Rose; Baoshan Zhang; Krisha McKee; Sijy O'Dell; Gwo-Yu Chuang; Aliaksandr Druz; Ivelin S Georgiev; Chaim A Schramm; Anqi Zheng; M Gordon Joyce; Mangaiarkarasi Asokan; Amy Ransier; Sam Darko; Stephen A Migueles; Robert T Bailer; Mark K Louder; S Munir Alam; Robert Parks; Garnett Kelsoe; Tarra Von Holle; Barton F Haynes; Daniel C Douek; Vanessa Hirsch; Michael S Seaman; Lawrence Shapiro; John R Mascola; Peter D Kwong; Mark Connors
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 31.745

Review 5.  Use of broadly neutralizing antibodies for HIV-1 prevention.

Authors:  Amarendra Pegu; Ann J Hessell; John R Mascola; Nancy L Haigwood
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 12.988

6.  Multispecific anti-HIV duoCAR-T cells display broad in vitro antiviral activity and potent in vivo elimination of HIV-infected cells in a humanized mouse model.

Authors:  Kim Anthony-Gonda; Ariola Bardhi; Alex Ray; Nina Flerin; Mengyan Li; Weizao Chen; Christina Ochsenbauer; John C Kappes; Winfried Krueger; Andrew Worden; Dina Schneider; Zhongyu Zhu; Rimas Orentas; Dimiter S Dimitrov; Harris Goldstein; Boro Dropulić
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 17.956

7.  Targeting the HIV-1 Spike and Coreceptor with Bi- and Trispecific Antibodies for Single-Component Broad Inhibition of Entry.

Authors:  Salar N Khan; Devin Sok; Karen Tran; Arlette Movsesyan; Viktoriya Dubrovskaya; Dennis R Burton; Richard T Wyatt
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 5.103

8.  Target-independent variable region mediated effects on antibody clearance can be FcRn independent.

Authors:  Ryan L Kelly; Yao Yu; Tingwan Sun; Isabelle Caffry; Heather Lynaugh; Michael Brown; Tushar Jain; Yingda Xu; K Dane Wittrup
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 9.  Engineering broadly neutralizing antibodies for HIV prevention and therapy.

Authors:  Casey K Hua; Margaret E Ackerman
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 10.  Therapeutic potential of HIV-1 entry inhibitor peptidomimetics.

Authors:  Nneka Pu Korie; Kwesi Z Tandoh; Samuel K Kwofie; Osbourne Quaye
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2021-02-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.