Literature DB >> 25760497

Orthopedic surgery fellowships: the effects of interviewing and how residents establish a rank list.

Matthew C Niesen, Jeffrey Wong, Edward Ebramzadeh, Sophia Sangiorgio, Nelson Fong SooHoo, James V Luck, Jeffrey Eckardt.   

Abstract

The Orthopaedic Fellowship Match was established in 2008 to streamline and improve the process of matching residents and fellowships. The purpose of this study was to quantify the factors that affect the application process and to determine how residents establish a rank list. The Orthopaedic Fellowship Match has improved the ability of residents and programs to consider their options more carefully and to focus on finding the best match. However, this process introduces new factors for all parties involved to consider. The costs of the interview process and time away from service for residents may be larger than anticipated. Ultimately, residents value operative experience and staff members at a fellowship more than all other factors when selecting a fellowship. Copyright 2015, SLACK Incorporated.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25760497     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20150305-05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  15 in total

1.  Content and Accessibility of Shoulder and Elbow Fellowship Web Sites in the United States.

Authors:  Bradley L Young; Lasun O Oladeji; Kyle Cichos; Brent Ponce
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2016

2.  Factors Influencing Subspecialty Choice of Orthopedic Residents: Effect of Gender, Year in Residency, and Presumptive Subspecialty.

Authors:  Bennet A Butler; Daniel Johnson; Robert A Christian; Stephen D Bigach; Matthew D Beal; Terrance D Peabody
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2020

Review 3.  The Impact of COVID-19 on the Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellowship Application Process.

Authors:  Liam A Peebles; Matthew J Kraeutler; Brian R Waterman; Seth L Sherman; Mary K Mulcahey
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-05-29

4.  Evaluation of Orthopaedic Trauma Fellowship Web Sites and an Assessment of 21 Content Domains.

Authors:  Bradley L Young; Colin K Cantrell; Brent A Ponce; Jonathan H Quade
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2018

5.  Women in Orthopaedic Fellowships: What Is Their Match Rate, and What Specialties Do They Choose?

Authors:  Lisa K Cannada
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Association of Mentor-to-Program Contact and Applicant Rank Disclosure With Vitreoretinal Fellowship Applicant's Final Match Outcome in 2016 and 2017.

Authors:  Steven M Christiansen; James M Osher; Christopher D Riemann
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 7.389

7.  The Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellowship Application Process: An Analysis of the Applicant Experience.

Authors:  Tyler Zeoli; Matthew L Ashton; Symone M Brown; Eric McCarty; Mary K Mulcahey
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-01-30

8.  The gynecologic oncology fellowship interview process: Challenges and potential areas for improvement.

Authors:  Gregory M Gressel; Anne Van Arsdale; Shayan M Dioun; Gary L Goldberg; Nicole S Nevadunsky
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-04-07

9.  Outcomes in the Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellowship Match, 2010-2017.

Authors:  Mary K Mulcahey; Meghan K Hayes; Christopher M Smith; Matthew J Kraeutler; Jeffrey D Trojan; Eric C McCarty
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-05-15

10.  Variety and Complexity of Surgical Exposure, Operative Autonomy, and Program Reputation Are Important Factors for Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellowship Applicants.

Authors:  Francis J Oser; Bailey M Grimsley; Aubrey J Swinford; Symone M Brown; Mary K Mulcahey
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-04-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.