Literature DB >> 25760153

Neuromuscular Responses to 14 Weeks of Traditional and Daily Undulating Resistance Training.

B Ullrich1, S Holzinger2, M Soleimani2, T Pelzer1, J Stening3, M Pfeiffer2.   

Abstract

This study compared traditional (TP) and daily undulating (DUP) periodization on muscle strength, EMG-estimated neural drive and muscle architecture of the quadriceps femoris (QF). 10 non-athletic females (24.4±3.2 years) performed 14 weeks of isometric training for the QF exercising 1 leg using TP and the contralateral leg using DUP. Intensities varied from 60% to 80% of MVC and the intensity zones and training volume were equated for each leg. Knee extension MVC, maximal voluntary QF-EMG activity and vastus lateralis (VL) muscle architecture were measured in both legs before, after 6 weeks and after 14 weeks of training using dynamometry, surface EMG and ultrasonography. Isometric MVC and maximal QF-EMG remained unaltered after 6 weeks of training, but were significantly (P<0.05) enhanced after 14 weeks in both legs (MVC: TP 24%, DUP 23%; QF-EMG: TP 45%, DUP 46%). VL-architecture remained unchanged following 6 weeks of training, but VL-muscle thickness (TP 17%, DUP 16%) and fascicle length (TP 16%, DUP 17%) displayed significant (P<0.05) enlargements after 14 weeks in both legs. Importantly, these temporal neuromuscular alterations displayed no significant differences between the training legs. Therefore, periodization may not act as a key trigger for neuromuscular adaptations. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25760153     DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1398529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Med        ISSN: 0172-4622            Impact factor:   3.118


  6 in total

1.  Differential changes in muscle architecture and neuromuscular fatigability induced by isometric resistance training at short and long muscle-tendon unit lengths.

Authors:  Ryota Akagi; Avery Hinks; Geoffrey A Power
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2020-06-18

Review 2.  Periodization: Variation in the Definition and Discrepancies in Study Design.

Authors:  Ryo Kataoka; Ecaterina Vasenina; Jeremy Loenneke; Samuel L Buckner
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Periodization effects during short-term resistance training with equated exercise variables in females.

Authors:  Thiemo Pelzer; Boris Ullrich; Mark Pfeiffer
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 4.  Evidence-based recommendations for resistance and power training to prevent frailty in community-dwellers.

Authors:  Hélio José Coelho-Júnior; Marco Carlos Uchida; Anna Picca; Roberto Bernabei; Francesco Landi; Riccardo Calvani; Matteo Cesari; Emanuele Marzetti
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  What makes long-term resistance-trained individuals so strong? A comparison of skeletal muscle morphology, architecture, and joint mechanics.

Authors:  Thomas M Maden-Wilkinson; Thomas G Balshaw; Garry J Massey; Jonathan P Folland
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2019-12-24

Review 6.  Identifying the Structural Adaptations that Drive the Mechanical Load-Induced Growth of Skeletal Muscle: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Kent W Jorgenson; Stuart M Phillips; Troy A Hornberger
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 6.600

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.