C Lauand1, E L Niero1, V M Dias1, G M Machado-Santelli1. 1. Departamento de Biologia Celular e do Desenvolvimento, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Abstract
Lung cancer often exhibits molecular changes, such as the overexpression of the ErbB1 gene that encodes epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). ErbB1 amplification and mutation are associated with tumor aggressiveness and low response to therapy. The aim of the present study was to design a schedule to synchronize the cell cycle of A549 cell line (a non-small cell lung cancer) and to analyze the possible association between the micronuclei (MNs) and the extrusion of ErbB1 gene extra-copies. After double blocking, by the process of fetal bovine serum deprivation and vincristine treatment, MNs formation was monitored with 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation, which is an S-phase marker. Statistical analyses allowed us to infer that MNs may arise both in mitosis as well as in interphase. The MNs were able to replicate their DNA and this process seemed to be non-synchronous with the main cell nuclei. The presence of ErbB1 gene in the MNs was evaluated by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). ErbB1 sequences were detected in the MNs, but a relation between the MNs formation and extrusion of amplified ErbB1 could not be established. The present study sought to elucidate the meaning of MNs formation and its association with the elimination of oncogenes or other amplified sequences from the tumor cells.
Lung cancer often exhibits molecular changes, such as the overexpression of the ErbB1 gene that encodes epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). ErbB1 amplification and mutation are associated with tumor aggressiveness and low response to therapy. The aim of the present study was to design a schedule to synchronize the cell cycle of A549 cell line (a non-small cell lung cancer) and to analyze the possible association between the micronuclei (MNs) and the extrusion of ErbB1 gene extra-copies. After double blocking, by the process of fetal bovine serum deprivation and vincristine treatment, MNs formation was monitored with 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation, which is an S-phase marker. Statistical analyses allowed us to infer that MNs may arise both in mitosis as well as in interphase. The MNs were able to replicate their DNA and this process seemed to be non-synchronous with the main cell nuclei. The presence of ErbB1 gene in the MNs was evaluated by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). ErbB1 sequences were detected in the MNs, but a relation between the MNs formation and extrusion of amplified ErbB1 could not be established. The present study sought to elucidate the meaning of MNs formation and its association with the elimination of oncogenes or other amplified sequences from the tumor cells.
Gene amplification in a tumor has been associated with poor prognosis and chemotherapy
resistance. Cytogenetically, gene amplification can be observed in two different
structures, namely, double-minute (DM) and homogeneously staining region (HSR). DM is a
small extrachromosomal structure that is paired, acentric, and atelomeric and can be
formed by fragments of chromosomes, chromatin particles, and oncogenes. HSR is a region
in any chromosome that fails to display the typical banding patterns after
trypsin-Giemsa staining (1,2). Oncogene and multi-drug resistance genes are often overexpressed
due to their amplification (3).
ErbB1 (encoding epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR] protein)
gene amplification, for example, has been found predominantly in cases of lung cancer,
as well as in cases of gliomas, breast, and ovarian cancers. Some features like
proliferation, survival, induction of angiogenesis, invasion, metastasis, and activation
of transcription factors in the tumor cells are because of the amplified
ErbB1 (4).Amplified genes in DM have been detected inside micronuclei (MNs). One example includes
the selective elimination of c-myc through MNs by HL-60 (promyelocytic
leukemia) and COLO 320 (colon carcinoma) cell lines that leads to the reduction in
tumorigenicity (5). HL-60 cells can also be
differentiated by eliminating c-myc amplification through MNs (6). Moreover, the neuroblastoma cell lines
spontaneously eliminated amplified c-myc gene by MNs formation, leading
to a loss of the malignant phenotype (7). Another
example is the relationship between the selective elimination of cyclin-dependent kinase
4 (CDK4) sequences and liposarcoma differentiation (8). Micronucleus (MN) formation can be induced by
drugs that cause DNA damage, and these treatments usually affect the biology of cancer
cells (9,10).MN frequency has been extensively used as a biomarker of genomic instability and
chromosomal damage. This structure usually contains whole chromosomes or chromatin
fragments. MN assay has been used in studies of population biomonitoring (11,12),
evaluation of the genotoxic potential of the compounds (13,14), studies of the cancer
chemopreventive agents (15), and evaluation of
the biological effects in aquatic organisms exposed to chemical pollution (16).A549, a non-small lung carcinoma cell line, after the treatment with vincristine and
aphidicolin showed an increased rate of nuclear abnormalities, including MNs formation
(17). A549 cells contain 3.4 copies of
ErbB1 gene that encodes EGFR, which is a 170-kDa protein with an
extracellular domain, a transmembrane domain, and an intracellular tyrosine kinase
domain (18-20). EGFR is frequently overexpressed in many cancer types, including lung
cancer, and has been directly associated with cancer progression (21-23).Studies regarding the loss of amplified oncogenes by MN expulsion can contribute to
elucidate the possible functions of MN formation in cancer cells. Thus, this study aimed
to standardize a protocol for cell cycle synchronization to further analyze the possible
association of MN formation with the extrusion of ErbB1 gene
extra-copies in A549 cells.
Material and Methods
Cell culture
A549 cell line was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and was
maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's minimumessential medium (DMEM, Sigma,
USA). It was supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS; Cultilab, Brazil). Then,
this cell line was cultured in a 37°C humidified incubator in an atmosphere of 5%
CO2.
Mitotic index
The cells were seeded on coverslips in 35-mm dishes at 3x104 cells/dish.
At different times (according to the assays specified in the Results section), the
cells were fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde for 30 min. Then, the cells were washed with
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 for 10 min,
washed again and treated with ribonuclease (RNAse; 10 mg/mL) for 30 min. They were
incubated with 1% bovine albumin (Sigma, USA) for 1 h. Then, anti-phospho-histone H3
(Upstate, USA) was added and the cells were incubated in a humidified chamber for 3
h. The samples were also incubated with secondary antibody fluorescein isothiocyanate
(FITC)-conjugated for 1.5 h. Nuclei were counterstained with propidium iodide (PI)
and 1000 cells/slide were counted using a fluorescence microscope (Nikon, EDF-3,
Japan). The images were obtained using a confocal laser-scanning microscope (LSM 510,
Zeiss, Germany).
Nuclear aberrations and lamin-B labeling
Cells were seeded on coverslips in 35-mm dishes at 3x104 cells/dish. After
the double blockade by gradual FCS removal followed by vincristine treatment
(detailed in the results), the cells were fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde for 30 min,
washed again with PBS and permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 for 10 min. RNAse (10
mg/mL) was added for 30 min. In order to observe the nuclear envelope, the samples
were incubated with anti-lamin B antibody (Santa Cruz, USA) for 15 h in a humidified
chamber. We added secondary antibody (FITC-conjugated) for 1.5 h. Nuclei were
counterstained with PI and 1000 cells/slide were counted using a fluorescence
microscope (Nikon, EDF-3). The images were obtained using a confocal laser-scanning
microscope (LSM 510, Zeiss).
5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation
After BrdU incorporation (depending on the protocols as shown in the Results
section), at different times, the cells were fixed with cold methanol for 30 min,
followed by 3.7% formaldehyde for 10 min. The different time durations of BrdU
incorporation during synchronization is detailed in the Results section. The cells
were permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 for 10 min and washed with PBS. RNAse was
added for 30 min. We then added anti-BrdU antibody+nuclease (GE Healthcare, UK) for
40 min. The samples were washed with PBS and secondary antibody FITC-conjugated was
added for 1 h. Nuclei were counterstained with PI and 1000 cells/slide were counted
using a fluorescence microscope (Nikon, EDF-3). The images were obtained using a
confocal laser-scanning microscope (LSM 510, Zeiss).
Characterization of the cell cycle in A549 cells
The times of each phase of the cell cycle of A549 cells was determined after making
some modifications in the protocol as proposed by Uzbekov et al (24). Briefly, Gap 2 (G2) was evaluated through
the frequencies of mitotic cells labeled with anti-BrdU after 1 h of BrdU pulse. The
frequencies were determined by fixing cells in intervals of 30 min for 7 h. The first
labeled mitotic cells were observed after 3 h. The minimum length of G2 is considered
to be the summation of this time plus the time of the BrdU pulse (G2min=4
h). The maximum length of G2 is considered to be the summation of the time when the
frequency of mitotic cells labeled with anti-BrdU is maximum and the period of the
BrdU pulse after excluding a half of the mitotic time (see below). We found that
G2max=7 h. Thus, according to Uzbekov et al. (25): G2 = (G2min+G2max/2) - (time of BrdU
incorporation). G2 = (4+7/2) -1 = 4.5 h.To determine the length of cell cycle and S phase, the cells were incubated with BrdU
and fixed at intervals of 3 h for 36 h. The frequencies of labeled cells increased
from 36.7% at the beginning of the experiment to 88.8% after 27 h (x=0.888). This
time duration was considered to calculate the length of the cell cycle (Lcc), where
Lcc-S=27. The length of S phase (S) was calculated from the initial frequency of
positively labeled BrdU cells, where S=0.367.Thus, according to Uzbekov et al. (24):
S/Lcc=0.367/0.888=0.413. So, S=0.413 Lcc. Once Lcc-S=27, we found that: Lcc=46 h and
S=19 h.The time of the mitosis (M) was calculated using the mean of the mitotic index (2.45%
as per the our results of mitotic index). According to Uzbekov et al. (25), M is denoted by the mean of the mitotic
index multiplied by the time of the whole cell cycle. Thus: M=0.0245×46=1 h 7
min.Finally, the duration of Gap1 (G1) phase=Lcc-S-G2-M. So, G1=21.3 h.
Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)
According to the manufacturer's instructions, FISH protocol, with some modifications,
was performed using the kit ZytoVision SPEC EGFR/CEN 7 Dual Color probe (Germany)
(26). At the end of the protocol, the
samples were washed in PBS for 1 min and incubated with TO-PRO-3 for 20 min. The
images were obtained using a confocal laser-scanning microscope (LSM 510, Zeiss).
Statistical analysis
The statistical analyses were performed using the test of equality of two
proportions. It enabled us to evaluate if the proportion of responses of two
variables and/or their levels were statistically significant. In order to further
complement the descriptive analysis of the quantitative values, we applied the
confidence interval to the mean.
Results
Cell cycle synchronization
The A549 cell cycle was determined based on the labeled mitoses method using BrdU
pulse, kinetics of BrdU incorporation, and mitotic indexes. Cell cycle phases were
calculated according to Uzbekov et al. (24).
The mean cell cycle lasted 46 h with G1 corresponding to 21.5 h, S phase to 19 h, G2
to 4.5 h, and mitosis to 1 h and 7 min, on average. Based on these data, a schedule
was designed to attempt the synchronization of A549 cells (Figure 1).
Figure 1
Cell synchronization protocol by double blockade in the A549 cell line. The
schedule shows the period of fetal calf serum (FCS) deprivation and vincristine
exposure. It also shows the different times of recovery (T) after vincristine
removal (6, 18, 24 and 48 h).
The FCS was gradually removed every 24 h until it reached 0% in the culture medium.
We anticipated that after 50 h of FCS privation, the majority of the cells would be
arrested in G0/G1 phase. The medium was then supplemented with 10% FCS for 44 h so
that the cells could progress in cell cycle. Vincristine (0.1 μg/mL) was added to the
medium for 6 h to block the serum-deprived synchronized cells in subsequent mitosis
(Table 1). The time of vincristine
treatment was determined based on the length of A549 cell cycle.
Other concentrations of the drug were tested (0.05 and 0.5 μg/mL; Table 1). However, the concentration of 0.1
μg/mL was chosen, because of the higher frequency of c-mitosis until T6, and the
absence of c-mitosis in T18, T24, and T48, denoting the progression in cell cycle
after drug removal. Vincristine at 0.5 μg/mL also induced high frequency of nuclear
abnormalities. We considered c-mitosis as mitosis blocked by vincristine.
Morphological characteristics of c-mitosis are disorganized spindles and the
condensed chromosomes are unorganized in the equatorial plate (Figure 2).
Figure 2
Cytoskeleton analyses in A549 cells submitted to double blockade.
Upper panels show the integrity of microtubules and
microfilaments of A549 cells in interphase (upper left) and in
mitosis (upper right), in the control cells. Lower
panels show A549 cells in T6 with microtubule network
disorganization in interphase (lower left) and in c-mitosis
(lower right) after treatment with vincristine. Images are
projections of different slices obtained by laser scanning confocal microscopy
and show microtubule in blue and microfilaments in green. Nuclei were
counterstained with propidium iodide (red).
Micronucleated, binucleated, and multinucleated cells were counted at different
recovery times, together with mitosis and c-mitosis (mitosis blocked by vincristine)
(Table 1). The cells arrested in M phase
after the treatment with vincristine were considered to be synchronized. We found
33.8% of c-mitosis in T6 compared to 18% in T0. The percentage achieved in T6
indicated the frequencies of synchronized cells. Figure 2 illustrates the persistence of vincristine activity on the
microtubules of A549 cells 6 h after its removal from the culture medium.We observed multinucleated and binucleated cells in all groups and there was a
gradual increase in frequencies of nuclear aberrations over the recovery times. The
frequency of the micronucleated cells was higher in T18 (7.4%) compared to the
non-synchronized cells (basal frequency of micronucleated A549 cells = 1.48%) and to
the other recovery times (5.8% in T24 and 6.2% in T48). Examples of such alterations
are shown in Figure 3. The labeling of the
nuclear lamina led to confirmation of the micronuclei integrity.
Figure 3
Effects of double blockade in A549 cells. Nuclear morphology observed in
A549 cells at different times of recovery after vincristine exposure: c-mitoses
with condensed chromatin are observed immediately after vincristine removal
(T0); in high frequency in T6 (arrows); the highest frequency of micronuclei
observed in T18 (arrowheads). The lamin B labeling (green) allowed the
evaluation of nuclear envelope integrity in both main nucleus and micronucleus.
DNA was stained with propidium iodide (red). Images are projections of
different slices obtained by laser scanning confocal microscopy. T: times of
recovery after vincristine removal (0, 6, and 18 h).
Origin of micronuclei
As described above, we found MNs after recovery of vincristine treatment and, then,
we tried to determine the origin of these MNs (mitotic or interphasic) by making use
of the pulses of BrdU incorporation as a tool. Figure
4A shows the examples of cells with nuclei and micronuclei that
incorporated BrdU (BrdU+). Two schedules of BrdU incorporation have been designed:
BrdU-1, wherein the pulse of BrdU occurred when the synchronized cells were in the S
phase; and BrdU-2, wherein the pulse of BrdU occurred 1 hour before withdrawal of
vincristine (Figure 4B). The cells were fixed
after 0, 6 and 18 h of recovery. We analyzed frequencies of interphase nuclei,
c-mitoses, and MNs. The results are reported in Table 2.
Figure 4
BrdU incorporation as a tool to analyze the micronucleus origin in
synchronized A549 cells. A, Illustrative images of BrdU
incorporation in A549 cells. Micronuclei positive to BrdU labeling (BrdU+ MN)
and one negative micronucleus (BrdU- MN) that did not incorporate the BrdU are
shown (arrowheads and arrow, respectively). BrdU is showed in green and DNA was
stained with propidium iodide (red). B, Schedule of two BrdU
incorporation protocols proposed to evaluate micronucleus origin: BrdU-1,
wherein the pulse of BrdU occurred when the synchronized cells were in the S
phase; and BrdU-2, wherein the pulse of BrdU occurred 1 h before withdrawal of
vincristine. Images were obtained by laser scanning confocal microscopy. FCS:
fetal calf serum; T: times of recovery after vincristine removal (0, 6, and 18
h).
With regard to BrdU-1, cells in T0 showed 40.1% BrdU labeled nuclei and cells in T6
and T18 showed 42.1% and 47.3% labeled nuclei, respectively. As expected, T6 showed
the highest frequency of c-mitosis with BrdU incorporation, while T18 showed the
lowest frequency of c-mitosisBrdU+. In T0 and T6, the frequencies of c-mitosisBrdU+
were higher than c-mitosisBrdU-. During BrdU incorporation, synchronized cells were
in the S phase and in T0, they were blocked in c-mitosis with BrdU labeling. We
evaluated around 100 MNs for each group and 43% of them were found to be positive to
BrdU incorporation in T0. T6 and T18 showed 23% and 36% of positive MNs,
respectively. These BrdU-labeled MNs in T18 were originated probably during mitosis.
The MNs without BrdU labeling were originated from cells that were not in the S phase
at the BrdU pulse and these cells were considered to be non-synchronized.In the next set of experiments considering BrdU-2, it was anticipated that the
synchronized cells would be arrested in mitosis, but we found such cells that
incorporated BrdU and, therefore, these cells were non-synchronized. As expected,
c-mitosis in T0 did not show BrdU labeling. The analysis of the cell population
showed an increased frequency of BrdU+ MNs. T0, T6 and T18 showed 25%, 34% and 47% of
BrdU labeling into MNs, respectively. The BrdU+ MNs observed in T0 and T6 couldn't be
induced by vincristine and they probably originated in interphase. Again, T18 also
had enrichment of interphasic MNs, although some of them were probably formed in
mitosis. The results can be viewed in Table
2.These experiments showed that MNs could originate in mitosis as well as in
interphase. Then, we chose T18 for the later experiments because of the higher
frequency of MNs achieved at this recovery time.
Characterization of micronuclei content
ErbB1 gene amplification in lung cancer cells is a very common
observation. We evaluated if selective oncogene elimination was possible in the MNs
shown in the ErbB1 gene. We also analyzed the cells submitted to
synchronization protocol (T18 group) and compared them with the cells cultured in
normal medium, supplemented with 10% FCS (control group).Figure 5 shows cells with examples of MNs
positive or negative to ErbB1 labeling (that is ErbB1+ and ErbB1-,
respectively). We observed 21.11% and 14.44% of MNsErbB1+ in control cells and in
the T18 group, respectively. But these differences were not statistically
significant. The quantification of ErbB1+ MNs in control cells and in the T18 group
indicated that there was no selective elimination of the ErbB1 gene
in MNs of synchronized cells.
Figure 5
Fluorescent in situ hybridization of
ErbB1 gene in A549 cells. A, Control cells
(from non-synchronized cell culture) showing usually 3 copies of
ErbB1 gene in each nucleus. B, Cells
submitted to synchronization protocol after 18 h recovery. Note a micronuclei
positive to ErbB1 labeling (red arrow) and micronuclei
negative to ErbB1 labeling (white arrow). Multinucleated cells
showed a deviation of the usual number of copies of ErbB1. The
ErbB1 gene was labeled in green. Nuclei were counterstained
with TO-PRO-3 (blue). Images were obtained by laser scanning confocal
microscopy.
Discussion
BrdU incorporation for 1 h resulted in 36.75% of A549 cells BrdU+ and they represented
the S phase frequency in the cell population. Chang et al. (27) studied the A549 cell cycle by cytometry and reported that the
percentage of cells in the S phase was 32.1 after 1 day and 38.9% after 2 days in
culture. They also showed that 54% of the cells were in G1 phase, indicating the longer
duration of this phase in A549 cells.The drugs that block the cell cycle at specific points have been used to obtain
synchronized cells. However, the methods should be standardized for each cell type
taking into consideration the duration time of cycle phase and the cell behavior after
treatment. Many drugs were used to cause cell cycle arrest: a) thymidine, aphidicolin,
mimosine, hydroxyurea, and 5-fluorodeoxyuridine were used to cause cell cycle arrest in
the S phase; b) N-acetyl-leucyl-leucyl-norleucinal (ALLN), nocodazole, colchicine and
colcemide in mitosis; and c) lovastatin and Hoechst 768159 in G1 phase (methods reviewed
by Uzbekov, (28)).Synchronization of tumor cell population is difficult because tumor cells have the
ability to avoid the effects of many drugs. One such example is the expression of genes
responsible for the multidrug resistance (MDR) phenotype. Our group could not find
efficient conditions of colchicine treatment to induce cell cycle arrest in A549 cell
line (data not shown). Instead, vincristine was the alternative used to block the cell
cycle in mitosis.As observed at T6, with an increase in the frequency of c-mitosis, even after the
removal of vincristine, it still continued to act in the cells. After 18 h of recovery,
all the cells progressed in the cell cycle because there was no evidence of c-mitosis.
Keeping in mind that A549 cells could show mechanisms of drug resistance against
vincristine and other drugs, which is common in cancer cell lines, 33.8% of synchronized
cells could be considered relevant for this study (29). This possible mechanism of drug resistance in A549 cells is supported by
the negative results obtained with colchicine treatment. This rate of synchronized cells
was supported by statistical analysis.The data of synchronized cells allowed us to infer that many A549 cells evaded the
mitotic checkpoint. In this case, despite the microtubules disassembly, the cells
progressed in the mitosis, increasing the frequencies of micronucleated, binucleated,
and multinucleated cells (30). The A549 mitotic
checkpoint is considered to be functional. Weitzel and Vandré (31) and Masuda et al. (32)
showed that the treatment of A549 cells with drugs that interfere with the spindle
dynamic were responsible for causing the cell cycle arrest in mitosis.The results showed that the synchronization was efficient in causing enrichment of
micronucleated cell population in the cultures. This enrichment could be considered to
be a useful tool in studying the expulsion of amplified genes by micronuclei formation.
Nevertheless, micronuclei induced by vincristine shown in our results were not
spontaneous micronuclei and thus it was not possible to determine if they originated
during interphase or mitosis.Micronuclei observed in T0 and T6 could not be generated in synchronized cells because
these cells were supposed to be arrested in c-mitosis. As shown in Table 1, the cells that incorporated BrdU in the S
phase probably evaded the cell synchronization according to the presented schedules.BrdU incorporation allowed us to elucidate the origin of MNs observed in T18, in mitotic
and interphasic cells. We observed cells with MN BrdU- and nuclei BrdU+. The MNs were
able to replicate their DNA content and this process seemed to be non-synchronic with
the main cell nuclei. Okamoto et al. (33) also
showed similar results and it was observed that the timing of replication in the MN and
the nucleus sometimes were non-synchronic, depending on the MN content.Some authors have proposed different mechanisms for MN formation (8,34-36). Many previous works have already demonstrated that there are
amplified genes of extrachromosomal regions in the MNs of tumor cells. One example is
the gene MYC, which was observed in DM, in the hydroxyurea-induced MNs
in humancolorectal carcinoma (37,38). Villa et al. (39) observed MYC in MNs of leukemia cells and Valent et al.
(40) showed that this gene, as DM, was found
in spontaneous MNs of neuroblastoma in vivo. Hélias-Rodzewicz et al.
(8) also associated the elimination of
amplified CDK4 sequences with differentiation in liposarcoma.The frequency of micronuclei positive to BrdU in T18 (36%) showed the importance of this
time of recovery in our analysis. This recovery time also showed the highest frequency
of micronucleated cells (7.4%). ErbB1 was found to be amplified in many
lung cancer cells, especially in A549 cells (about 3 copies/nucleus) (18,26). Thus,
we investigated the relation between ErbB1 amplification and its
presence in the micronucleated A549 cells.We compared the frequency of MNsErbB1+ in the control and T18 groups. Statistical
analysis did not show any differences between these groups; thus, we concluded that
there was no preferential extrusion of ErbB1 gene by synchronized
cells. Shimizu et al. (38) further demonstrated
that DM can originate aggregates that get delayed during the chromatid separation in
anaphase, eventually leading to MN formation. ErbB1 was not found in the
extrachromosomal regions of the A549 cell line in our culture conditions. This result
could help explain the low frequency of MNsErbB1+.Figure 6 summarizes the results and shows the
schedule of synchronization and the possibilities of MN formation in mitosis or
interphase obtained by BrdU-1 and BrdU-2 assays in the T18 group. Due to the enrichment
of MNs in the T18 group, this time was chosen for evaluating the possible extrusion of
extra copies of ErbB1. Nevertheless, our data suggested that there was
no selective elimination of this gene in this system.
Figure 6
Summary of the main results of this study. A, Schedule of
cell cycle synchronization showing the time of each cell cycle phase and the
double blockade with serum deprivation and vincristine made to analyze the origin
of micronuclei according to BrdU-1 and BrdU-2 assays. B, One aim
of this study was to evaluate the possible extrusion of ErbB1
extra copies by micronucleus formation. The data suggested that there was no
selective extrusion of the amplified gene. BrdU: 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine.
This research is an important piece of the puzzle that seeks to elucidate the meaning of
MN formation and its association with the elimination of oncogenes or other amplified
sequences from tumor cells. The synchronization protocol was efficient to cause the
enrichment of the MN population in A549 cells and it could be useful in studying MN
formation in this cell line.
Authors: A Valent; J Bénard; B Clausse; M Barrois; D Valteau-Couanet; M J Terrier-Lacombe; B Spengler; A Bernheim Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 4.307