| Literature DB >> 25759836 |
Małgorzata Wiese1, Andrzej Eljaszewicz2, Anna Helmin-Basa1, Marek Andryszczyk3, Ilona Motyl4, Jolanta Wieczyńska5, Lidia Gackowska1, Izabela Kubiszewska1, Milena Januszewska1, Jacek Michałkiewicz5.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to find out if selected lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains (antagonistic or nonantagonistic against H. pylori in vitro) would differ in their abilities to modulate the DCs maturation profiles reflected by their phenotype and cytokine expression patterns. Methods. Monocyte-derived DCs maturation was elicited by their direct exposure to the LAB strains of L. rhamnosus 900 or L. paracasei 915 (antagonistic and nonantagonistic to H. pylori, resp.), in the presence or absence of H. pylori strain cagA+. The DCs maturation profile was assessed on the basis of surface markers expression and cytokines production. Results. We observed that the LAB strains and the mixtures of LAB with H. pylori are able to induce mature DCs. At the same time, the L. paracasei 915 leads to high IL-10/IL-12p70 cytokine ratio, in contrast to L. rhamnosus 900. Conclusions. This study showed that the analyzed lactobacilli strains are more potent stimulators of DC maturation than H. pylori. Interestingly from the two chosen LAB strains the antagonistic to H. pylori-L. rhamnosus strain 900 has more proinflammatory and probably antibactericidal properties.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25759836 PMCID: PMC4352478 DOI: 10.1155/2015/106743
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Immunol Res ISSN: 2314-7156 Impact factor: 4.818
Antagonistic activity of lactic acid bacteria strains.
| Species | Strain | Growth inhibition zone [mm] |
|---|---|---|
|
| ŁOCK 899 | 1.7 |
| ŁOCK 901 | 0 | |
| ŁOCK 902 | 0 | |
| ŁOCK 903 | 0 | |
| ŁOCK 904 | 0 | |
| ŁOCK 905 | 1.7 | |
| ŁOCK 906 | 2.1 | |
| ŁOCK 907 | 0 | |
| ŁOCK 908 | 4.8 | |
| ŁOCK 909 | 0 | |
| ŁOCK 910 | 0 | |
| ŁOCK 911 | 2.5 | |
|
| ||
|
| ŁOCK 900* | 5.21 |
|
| ||
|
| ŁOCK 912 | 0 |
| ŁOCK 913 | 2.9 | |
| ŁOCK 914 | 0 | |
| ŁOCK 915* | 0 | |
| ŁOCK 916 | 2.9 | |
| ŁOCK 917 | 1.6 | |
| ŁOCK 918 | 2.7 | |
| ŁOCK 919 | 3.6 | |
| ŁOCK 920 | 2.2 | |
| ŁOCK 921 | 1.7 | |
| ŁOCK 922 | 0 | |
| ŁOCK 923 | 0 | |
| ŁOCK 924 | 0 | |
|
| ||
|
| ŁOCK 862 | 2.3 |
| ŁOCK 864 | 0 | |
| ŁOCK 943 | 1.6 | |
*The selected strains.
Effect of the examined bacteria and their mixtures on the expression of DCs markers (CD14, HLA-DR, CD80, CD83, CD86, and CD40).
| Receptor type | Control |
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD14 | ||||||
| % | 0.83 [0.47–0.87] | 1.57 [0.38–2.83] | 0.89 [0.50–2.67] | 1.29 [0.85–2.18] | 1.63 [0.43–1.92] | 0.85 [0.41–4.70] |
| GFI | 172 [147–221] | 217 [165–230] | 198 [162–256] | 162 [149–179] | 206 [157–211] | 232 [169–258] |
| HLA-DR | ||||||
| % | 95.42 [94.80–99.21] | 96.21 [94.90–98.11] | 98.21 [95.60–98.50] | 98.70 [98.60–99.15] | 96.85 [95.09–97.30] | 96.75 [94.30–99.11] |
| GFI | 335 [294–360] | 778* [700–1806] | 765* [632–1423] | 1504* [1040–1811] | 777* [717–1989] | 839* [713–1436] |
| CD80 | ||||||
| % | 4.20 [3.91–5.18] | 15.50∗† [12.40–28.20] | 37.80∗† [25.80–47.60] | 3.71 [2.53–11.90] | 18.5∗† [13.10–29.10] | 36.65∗†‡ [28.10–56.20] |
| GFI | 154 [140–181] | 152 [147–160] | 216∗†‡ [166–224] | 154 [149–162] | 149 [148–170] | 177‡ [161–185] |
| CD83 | ||||||
| % | 1.56 [0.99–1.94] | 14.7* [8.95–18.88] | 39.35∗†‡§ [27.27–45.00] | 6.27* [3.94–13.01] | 13.35* [9.52–18.43] | 30.65∗†§ [18.77–50.98] |
| GFI | 160 [146–207] | 155 [132–239] | 152 [141–157] | 147 [140–159] | 155 [155–181] | 143 [136–152] |
| CD86 | ||||||
| % | 97.25 [89.11–99.61] | 96.45 [95.18–99.10] | 96.30 [95.66–99.43] | 99.00 [95.44–99.33] | 97.45 [95.71–99.55] | 97.12 [94.96–99.35] |
| GFI | 554 [373–608] | 2740* [1118–3390] | 2079.5* [899–3143] | 3388* [1514–3742] | 3447* [3048–3667] | 2496* [2002–3226] |
| CD40 | ||||||
| % | 35.51 [17.33–40.41] | 30.26 [26.34–39.89] | 23.70 [23.46–27.78] | 21.05 [16.95–28.25] | 30.45 [24.79–53.67] | 26.65 [12.17–45.45] |
| GFI | 145 [105.2–175] | 145 [141–153] | 175 [132–219] | 131 [123–140] | 146 [127–167] | 145 [142–149] |
DCs: dendritic cells; %: the percentage of DCs expressing the analyzed receptor; GFI: geometric mean fluorescence intensity of the analyzed receptor in DCs population exhibiting its expression; values are expressed as the medians of six independent experiments and range of lower quartile-upper quartile [Q1–Q3]; statistically significant differences: *stimulators versus control (unstimulated DCs), †stimulators versus H. pylori, ‡stimulators versus L. rhamnosus 900, and §stimulators versus L.rhamnosus 900 + H. pylori; P < 0.05.
Figure 1Phenotype of immature DCs. Histograms of representative cytometric data illustrate the following: (a) percentage of CD80+ DCs; (b) percentage of CD83+ DCs, (c) percentage of CD86+ DCs; (d) percentage of CD40+ DCs; (e) percentage of HLA-DR+ DCs; and (f) percentage of CD11c+ DCs. DCs: dendritic cells; stimulated DCs are represented by filled curves; isotype controls are represented by empty curves.
Expression of chosen receptors (CD14, HLA-DR, CD80, CD83, CD86, CD40, and CD11c) on monocyte-derived DCs surface.
| Receptor type | CD14 | HLA-DR | CD80 | CD83 | CD86 | CD40 | CD11c |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| iDC | |||||||
| % | 1.98 | 97.11 | 4.99 | 1.27 | 98.55 | 26.4 | 98.7 |
| GFI | 183 | 336 | 181 | 150 | 463 | 160 | 676 |
DCs: dendritic cells; iDCs: immature DCs; %: the percentage of DCs expressing the analyzed receptor; GFI: geometric mean fluorescence intensity of the analyzed receptor in DCs population exhibiting its expression; values are expressed as the medians of six independent experiments and range of lower quartile-upper quartile [Q1–Q3].
Figure 2Effect of the examined bacteria and their mixtures on the production of cytokines by DCs population. Values expressed as medians from six independent experiments and interquartile ranges [Q1–Q3]; control: unstipulated DCs; L.r.: L. rhamnosus 900; L.p.: L. paracasei 915; H.p.: H. pylori; statistically significant differences are given as follows: ∗: stimulators versus control (unstimulated DCs), †: stimulators versus H. pylori, ‡: stimulators versus L. rhamnosus 900, §: stimulators versus L. rhamnosus 900 + H. pylori, and $: stimulators versus L. paracasei 915 + H. pylori; P < 0.05; DCs: dendritic cells.
Figure 3The cytokine IL-10/IL-12p70 ratio. Values expressed as medians from the ratios from six independent experiments and interquartile ranges [Q1–Q3]; control: unstipulated DCs; L.r.: L. rhamnosus 900; L.p.: L. paracasei 915; and H.p.: H. pylori; statistically significant differences are given as follows: ∗: stimulators versus control (unstimulated DCs), †: stimulators versus H. pylori, ‡: stimulators versus L. rhamnosus 900, stimulators versus L. paracasei 915; P < 0.05; DCs: dendritic cells.