Luming Zhou1, Robert A Palais2, Christian N Paxton3, Katherine B Geiersbach4, Carl T Wittwer5. 1. Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT; carl.wittwer@path.utah.edu luming.zhou@path.utah.edu. 2. Department of Mathematics, Utah Valley University, Orem, UT; 3. ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT. 4. Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT; ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT. 5. Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT; ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT. carl.wittwer@path.utah.edu luming.zhou@path.utah.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: DNA copy number variation is associated with genetic disorders and cancer. Available methods to discern variation in copy number are typically costly, slow, require specialized equipment, and/or lack precision. METHODS: Multiplex PCR with different primer pairs and limiting deoxynucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs) (3-12 μmol/L) were used for relative quantification and copy number assessment. Small PCR products (50-121 bp) were designed with 1 melting domain, well-separated Tms, minimal internal sequence variation, and no common homologs. PCR products were displayed as melting curves on derivative plots and normalized to the reference peak. Different copy numbers of each target clustered together and were grouped by unbiased hierarchical clustering. RESULTS: Duplex PCR of a reference gene and a target gene was used to detect copy number variation in chromosomes X, Y, 13, 18, 21, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), survival of motor neuron 1, telomeric (SMN1), and survival of motor neuron 2, centromeric (SMN2). Triplex PCR was used for X and Y and CFTR exons 2 and 3. Blinded studies of 50 potential trisomic samples (13, 18, 21, or normal) and 50 samples with potential sex chromosome abnormalities were concordant to karyotyping, except for 2 samples that were originally mosaics that displayed a single karyotype after growth. Large cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (ATP-binding cassette sub-family C, member 7) (CFTR) deletions, EGFR amplifications, and SMN1 and SMN2 copy number assessments were also demonstrated. Under ideal conditions, copy number changes of 1.11-fold or lower could be discerned with CVs of about 1%. CONCLUSIONS: Relative quantification by restricting the dNTP concentration with melting curve display is a simple and precise way to assess targeted copy number variation.
BACKGROUND: DNA copy number variation is associated with genetic disorders and cancer. Available methods to discern variation in copy number are typically costly, slow, require specialized equipment, and/or lack precision. METHODS: Multiplex PCR with different primer pairs and limiting deoxynucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs) (3-12 μmol/L) were used for relative quantification and copy number assessment. Small PCR products (50-121 bp) were designed with 1 melting domain, well-separated Tms, minimal internal sequence variation, and no common homologs. PCR products were displayed as melting curves on derivative plots and normalized to the reference peak. Different copy numbers of each target clustered together and were grouped by unbiased hierarchical clustering. RESULTS: Duplex PCR of a reference gene and a target gene was used to detect copy number variation in chromosomes X, Y, 13, 18, 21, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), survival of motor neuron 1, telomeric (SMN1), and survival of motor neuron 2, centromeric (SMN2). Triplex PCR was used for X and Y and CFTR exons 2 and 3. Blinded studies of 50 potential trisomic samples (13, 18, 21, or normal) and 50 samples with potential sex chromosome abnormalities were concordant to karyotyping, except for 2 samples that were originally mosaics that displayed a single karyotype after growth. Large cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (ATP-binding cassette sub-family C, member 7) (CFTR) deletions, EGFR amplifications, and SMN1 and SMN2 copy number assessments were also demonstrated. Under ideal conditions, copy number changes of 1.11-fold or lower could be discerned with CVs of about 1%. CONCLUSIONS: Relative quantification by restricting the dNTP concentration with melting curve display is a simple and precise way to assess targeted copy number variation.
Authors: Vincent J Carson; Erik G Puffenberger; Lauren E Bowser; Karlla W Brigatti; Millie Young; Dominika Korulczyk; Ashlin S Rodrigues; KaLynn K Loeven; Kevin A Strauss Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-09-06 Impact factor: 3.240