Literature DB >> 25759441

Mistake index as a surrogate of quality in scientific manuscripts.

Antoni Margalida1, M Àngels Colomer2.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2015        PMID： 25759441      PMCID： PMC4386367          DOI： 10.1073/pnas.1500322112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN： 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

Review 1.  Conceptual debates and empirical evidence about the peer review process for scholarly journals.

Authors:  Sandra P Thomas
Journal:  J Prof Nurs       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.104

2.  Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping.

Authors:  Kyle Siler; Kirby Lee; Lisa Bero
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Modelling the effects of subjective and objective decision making in scientific peer review.

Authors:  In-Uck Park; Mike W Peacey; Marcus R Munafò
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 49.962
  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  Reply to Margalida and Colomer: Science should strive to prevent mistakes, not corrections.

Authors:  Kyle Siler; Kirby Lee; Lisa Bero
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Improving the peer-review process and editorial quality: key errors escaping the review and editorial process in top scientific journals.

Authors:  Antoni Margalida; M Àngels Colomer
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 2.984
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.