Literature DB >> 25759103

Meta-analysis of trials on mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention compared with medical therapy in patients with stable coronary heart disease and objective evidence of myocardial ischemia.

Hemal Gada1, Ajay J Kirtane2, Dean J Kereiakes3, Sripal Bangalore4, Jeffrey W Moses5, Philippe Généreux6, Roxana Mehran7, George D Dangas7, Martin B Leon5, Gregg W Stone5.   

Abstract

Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus medical therapy (MT) in the management of stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) remain controversial, with some but not all studies showing improved results in patients with ischemia. We sought to elucidate whether PCI improves mortality compared to MT in patients with objective evidence of ischemia (assessed using noninvasive imaging or its invasive equivalent). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PCI to MT in patients with SIHD. To maintain a high degree of specificity for ischemia, studies were only included if ischemia was defined on the basis of noninvasive stress imaging or abnormal fractional flow reserve. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. We identified 3 RCTs (Effects of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Silent Ischemia After Myocardial Infarction II, Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation 2, and a substudy of the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation trial) enrolling a total of 1,557 patients followed for an average of 3.0 years. When compared with MT in this population of patients with objective ischemia, PCI was associated with lower mortality (hazard ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.30 to 0.92, p=0.02). There was no evidence of study heterogeneity or bias among included trials. In this meta-analysis of published RCTs, PCI was shown to have a mortality benefit over MT in patients with SIHD and objective assessment of ischemia using noninvasive imaging or its invasive equivalent. In conclusion, this study provides insight into the management of a higher-risk SIHD population that is the focus of the ongoing International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches trial.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25759103     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.01.556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  15 in total

Review 1.  Effect of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Survival in Patients with Stable Ischemic Heart Disease.

Authors:  Francisco Ujueta; Ephraim N Weiss; Binita Shah; Steven P Sedlis
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Impact of prior permanent pacemaker on long-term clinical outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Yan-Jie Li; Wei-Wei Zhang; Xiao-Xiao Yang; Ning Li; Xing-Biao Qiu; Xin-Kai Qu; Wei-Yi Fang; Yi-Qing Yang; Ruo-Gu Li
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 3.  Medical Therapy With Versus Without Revascularization in Stable Patients With Moderate and Severe Ischemia: The Case for Community Equipoise.

Authors:  Gregg W Stone; Judith S Hochman; David O Williams; William E Boden; T Bruce Ferguson; Robert A Harrington; David J Maron
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Update of the Brazilian Guideline on Nuclear Cardiology - 2020.

Authors:  Luiz Eduardo Mastrocola; Barbara Juarez Amorim; João Vicente Vitola; Simone Cristina Soares Brandão; Gabriel Blacher Grossman; Ronaldo de Souza Leão Lima; Rafael Willain Lopes; William Azem Chalela; Lara Cristiane Terra Ferreira Carreira; José Roberto Nolasco de Araújo; Cláudio Tinoco Mesquita; José Claudio Meneghetti
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  Prognostic value of stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance in asymptomatic patients without known coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Théo Pezel; Philippe Garot; Marine Kinnel; Thierry Unterseeh; Thomas Hovasse; Stéphane Champagne; Solenn Toupin; Francesca Sanguineti; Jérôme Garot
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Reduction of Vascular Inflammation, LDL-C, or Both for the Protection from Cardiovascular Events?

Authors:  Andromachi Reklou; Michael Doumas; Konstantinos Imprialos; Konstantinos Stavropoulos; Dimitris Patoulias; Vasilios G Athyros
Journal:  Open Cardiovasc Med J       Date:  2018-03-30

7.  Management of established coronary artery disease in aircrew without myocardial infarction or revascularisation.

Authors:  Eddie D Davenport; Gary Gray; Rienk Rienks; Dennis Bron; Thomas Syburra; Joanna L d'Arcy; Norbert J Guettler; Olivier Manen; Edward D Nicol
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Machine learning assessment of myocardial ischemia using angiography: Development and retrospective validation.

Authors:  Hyeonyong Hae; Soo-Jin Kang; Won-Jang Kim; So-Yeon Choi; June-Goo Lee; Youngoh Bae; Hyungjoo Cho; Dong Hyun Yang; Joon-Won Kang; Tae-Hwan Lim; Cheol Hyun Lee; Do-Yoon Kang; Pil Hyung Lee; Jung-Min Ahn; Duk-Woo Park; Seung-Whan Lee; Young-Hak Kim; Cheol Whan Lee; Seong-Wook Park; Seung-Jung Park
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  Angiography-Based Machine Learning for Predicting Fractional Flow Reserve in Intermediate Coronary Artery Lesions.

Authors:  Hyungjoo Cho; June-Goo Lee; Soo-Jin Kang; Won-Jang Kim; So-Yeon Choi; Jiyuon Ko; Hyun-Seok Min; Gun-Ho Choi; Do-Yoon Kang; Pil Hyung Lee; Jung-Min Ahn; Duk-Woo Park; Seung-Whan Lee; Young-Hak Kim; Cheol Whan Lee; Seong-Wook Park; Seung-Jung Park
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  Association between epicardial adipose tissue and adverse outcomes in coronary heart disease patients with percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Changqing Lu; Helei Jia; Zhentao Wang
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 3.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.