Literature DB >> 25758782

Fidelity consequences of the impaired interaction between DNA polymerase epsilon and the GINS complex.

Marta Garbacz1, Hiroyuki Araki2, Krzysztof Flis1, Anna Bebenek3, Anna E Zawada1, Piotr Jonczyk1, Karolina Makiela-Dzbenska4, Iwona J Fijalkowska5.   

Abstract

DNA polymerase epsilon interacts with the CMG (Cdc45-MCM-GINS) complex by Dpb2p, the non-catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase epsilon. It is postulated that CMG is responsible for targeting of Pol ɛ to the leading strand. We isolated a mutator dpb2-100 allele which encodes the mutant form of Dpb2p. We showed previously that Dpb2-100p has impaired interactions with Pol2p, the catalytic subunit of Pol ɛ. Here, we present that Dpb2-100p has strongly impaired interaction with the Psf1 and Psf3 subunits of the GINS complex. Our in vitro results suggest that while dpb2-100 does not alter Pol ɛ's biochemical properties including catalytic efficiency, processivity or proofreading activity - it moderately decreases the fidelity of DNA synthesis. As the in vitro results did not explain the strong in vivo mutator effect of the dpb2-100 allele we analyzed the mutation spectrum in vivo. The analysis of the mutation rates in the dpb2-100 mutant indicated an increased participation of the error-prone DNA polymerase zeta in replication. However, even in the absence of Pol ζ activity the presence of the dpb2-100 allele was mutagenic, indicating that a significant part of mutagenesis is Pol ζ-independent. A strong synergistic mutator effect observed for transversions in the triple mutant dpb2-100 pol2-4 rev3Δ as compared to pol2-4 rev3Δ and dpb2-100 rev3Δ suggests that in the presence of the dpb2-100 allele the number of replication errors is enhanced. We hypothesize that in the dpb2-100 strain, where the interaction between Pol ɛ and GINS is weakened, the access of Pol δ to the leading strand may be increased. The increased participation of Pol δ on the leading strand in the dpb2-100 mutant may explain the synergistic mutator effect observed in the dpb2-100 pol3-5DV double mutant.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA leading strand; DNA polymerase delta; DNA polymerase epsilon; DNA polymerase zeta; Fidelity of replication; GINS complex

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25758782     DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2015.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  18 in total

1.  Crystal structure of the human Polϵ B-subunit in complex with the C-terminal domain of the catalytic subunit.

Authors:  Andrey G Baranovskiy; Jianyou Gu; Nigar D Babayeva; Igor Kurinov; Youri I Pavlov; Tahir H Tahirov
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  The absence of the catalytic domains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase ϵ strongly reduces DNA replication fidelity.

Authors:  Marta A Garbacz; Phillip B Cox; Sushma Sharma; Scott A Lujan; Andrei Chabes; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  How asymmetric DNA replication achieves symmetrical fidelity.

Authors:  Zhi-Xiong Zhou; Scott A Lujan; Adam B Burkholder; Jordan St Charles; Joseph Dahl; Corinne E Farrell; Jessica S Williams; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 15.369

Review 4.  Post-Translational Modifications of PCNA: Guiding for the Best DNA Damage Tolerance Choice.

Authors:  Gemma Bellí; Neus Colomina; Laia Castells-Roca; Neus P Lorite
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-10

5.  Hypomorphic GINS3 variants alter DNA replication and cause Meier-Gorlin syndrome.

Authors:  Mary E McQuaid; Kashif Ahmed; Stephanie Tran; Justine Rousseau; Ranad Shaheen; Kristin D Kernohan; Kyoko E Yuki; Prerna Grover; Ema S Dreseris; Sameen Ahmed; Lucie Dupuis; Jennifer Stimec; Mary Shago; Zuhair N Al-Hassnan; Roch Tremblay; Philipp G Maass; Michael D Wilson; Eyal Grunebaum; Kym M Boycott; François-Michel Boisvert; Sateesh Maddirevula; Eissa A Faqeih; Fahad Almanjomi; Zaheer Ullah Khan; Fowzan S Alkuraya; Philippe M Campeau; Peter Kannu; Eric I Campos; Hugo Wurtele
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2022-05-23

Review 6.  A panoply of errors: polymerase proofreading domain mutations in cancer.

Authors:  Emily Rayner; Inge C van Gool; Claire Palles; Stephen E Kearsey; Tjalling Bosse; Ian Tomlinson; David N Church
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Proficient Replication of the Yeast Genome by a Viral DNA Polymerase.

Authors:  Joseph L Stodola; Carrie M Stith; Peter M Burgers
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Compensation for the absence of the catalytically active half of DNA polymerase ε in yeast by positively selected mutations in CDC28.

Authors:  Elena I Stepchenkova; Anna S Zhuk; Jian Cui; Elena R Tarakhovskaya; Stephanie R Barbari; Polina V Shcherbakova; Dmitrii E Polev; Roman Fedorov; Eugenia Poliakov; Igor B Rogozin; Artem G Lada; Youri I Pavlov
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Mutations in the Non-Catalytic Subunit Dpb2 of DNA Polymerase Epsilon Affect the Nrm1 Branch of the DNA Replication Checkpoint.

Authors:  Michał Dmowski; Justyna Rudzka; Judith L Campbell; Piotr Jonczyk; Iwona J Fijałkowska
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 10.  Stability across the Whole Nuclear Genome in the Presence and Absence of DNA Mismatch Repair.

Authors:  Scott Alexander Lujan; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 6.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.