Eric Blaschke1, Hiroyuki Abe1. 1. University of Chicago Medicine, Radiology, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) kinetic characteristics of newly diagnosed breast cancer molecular subtypes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Breast MRI examinations of 112 patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer were reviewed. Cases of newly diagnosed invasive ductal carcinoma were sorted by molecular subtype (28 TN, 11 HER2 +, 73 Lum A/B) and MRI field strength, with lesion segmentation and kinetic analyses performed on a dedicated workstation. For kinetic assessment, 50% and 100% thresholds were employed for display of medium and rapid uptake. Kinetic profiles in terms of percent volume for six kinetic types (medium-persistent, medium-plateau, medium-washout, fast-persistent, fast-plateau, fast-washout) relative to the whole volume of the lesion were obtained. Statistical analysis of the kinetic profiles was performed using Welch's t-test. RESULTS: Percent volume of HER2-positive lesions with >100% uptake at early phase on 3T strength MRI exams was significantly greater compared with luminal A/B (93.8 ± 0.92 vs. 77.3 ± 7.2; P < 0.01) and triple negative (93.8 ± 0.92 vs. 81.3 ± 8.2; P < 0.05) subtypes. The >50% early phase uptake for HER2+ lesions was also higher than Lum A/B (99.1 ± 0.73 vs. 93.6 ± 3.05; P < 0.01) at 3T. In the 1.5T subgroup the percent volume of HER2+ tumors with >50% and >100% early phase uptake trended higher than Lum A/B lesions without reaching significance. CONCLUSION: The percent volume of HER2-positive tumors demonstrating rapid early contrast uptake is significantly increased compared to other molecular subtypes.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) kinetic characteristics of newly diagnosed breast cancer molecular subtypes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Breast MRI examinations of 112 patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer were reviewed. Cases of newly diagnosed invasive ductal carcinoma were sorted by molecular subtype (28 TN, 11 HER2 +, 73 Lum A/B) and MRI field strength, with lesion segmentation and kinetic analyses performed on a dedicated workstation. For kinetic assessment, 50% and 100% thresholds were employed for display of medium and rapid uptake. Kinetic profiles in terms of percent volume for six kinetic types (medium-persistent, medium-plateau, medium-washout, fast-persistent, fast-plateau, fast-washout) relative to the whole volume of the lesion were obtained. Statistical analysis of the kinetic profiles was performed using Welch's t-test. RESULTS: Percent volume of HER2-positive lesions with >100% uptake at early phase on 3T strength MRI exams was significantly greater compared with luminal A/B (93.8 ± 0.92 vs. 77.3 ± 7.2; P < 0.01) and triple negative (93.8 ± 0.92 vs. 81.3 ± 8.2; P < 0.05) subtypes. The >50% early phase uptake for HER2+ lesions was also higher than Lum A/B (99.1 ± 0.73 vs. 93.6 ± 3.05; P < 0.01) at 3T. In the 1.5T subgroup the percent volume of HER2+ tumors with >50% and >100% early phase uptake trended higher than Lum A/B lesions without reaching significance. CONCLUSION: The percent volume of HER2-positive tumors demonstrating rapid early contrast uptake is significantly increased compared to other molecular subtypes.
Authors: Marco Macchini; Martina Ponziani; Andrea Prochowski Iamurri; Mirco Pistelli; Mariagrazia De Lisa; Rossana Berardi; Gian Marco Giuseppetti Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2018-06-05 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Maciej A Mazurowski; Ashirbani Saha; Michael R Harowicz; Elizabeth Hope Cain; Jeffrey R Marks; P Kelly Marcom Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2019-01-22 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Zhe Zhu; Ehab Albadawy; Ashirbani Saha; Jun Zhang; Michael R Harowicz; Maciej A Mazurowski Journal: Comput Biol Med Date: 2019-04-25 Impact factor: 4.589
Authors: Almir G V Bitencourt; Nara P Pereira; Luciana K L França; Caroline B Silva; Jociana Paludo; Hugo L S Paiva; Luciana Graziano; Camila S Guatelli; Juliana A Souza; Elvira F Marques Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2015-09-16 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Katja Pinker; Fuki Shitano; Evis Sala; Richard K Do; Robert J Young; Andreas G Wibmer; Hedvig Hricak; Elizabeth J Sutton; Elizabeth A Morris Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-11-02 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Richard Ha; Simukayi Mutasa; Jenika Karcich; Nishant Gupta; Eduardo Pascual Van Sant; John Nemer; Mary Sun; Peter Chang; Michael Z Liu; Sachin Jambawalikar Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 4.056
Authors: Elizabeth S Burnside; Karen Drukker; Hui Li; Ermelinda Bonaccio; Margarita Zuley; Marie Ganott; Jose M Net; Elizabeth J Sutton; Kathleen R Brandt; Gary J Whitman; Suzanne D Conzen; Li Lan; Yuan Ji; Yitan Zhu; Carl C Jaffe; Erich P Huang; John B Freymann; Justin S Kirby; Elizabeth A Morris; Maryellen L Giger Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-11-30 Impact factor: 6.860