Dmytro O Kryshtal1, Oleksiy Gryshchenko2, Nieves Gomez-Hurtado1, Bjorn C Knollmann3. 1. Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. 2. Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of General Physiology of Nervous System, Bogomoletz Institute of Physiology, Kyiv, Ukraine. 3. Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. Electronic address: bjorn.knollmann@vanderbilt.edu.
Abstract
AIMS: In cardiac muscle, Ca(2+) release from sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) is reduced with successively shorter coupling intervals of premature stimuli, a phenomenon known as SR Ca(2+) release refractoriness. We recently reported that the SR luminal Ca(2+) binding protein calsequestrin 2 (Casq2) contributes to release refractoriness in intact mouse hearts, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we further investigate the mechanisms responsible for physiological release refractoriness. METHODS AND RESULTS: Gene-targeted ablation of Casq2 (Casq2 KO) abolished SR Ca(2+) release refractoriness in isolated mouse ventricular myocytes. Surprisingly, impaired Ca(2+)-dependent inactivation of L-type Ca(2+) current (ICa), which is responsible for triggering SR Ca(2+) release, significantly contributed to loss of Ca(2+) release refractoriness in Casq2 KO myocytes. Recovery from Ca(2+)-dependent inactivation of ICa was significantly accelerated in Casq2 KO compared to wild-type (WT) myocytes. In contrast, voltage-dependent inactivation measured by using Ba(2+) as charge carrier was not significantly different between WT and Casq2 KO myocytes. Ca(2+)-dependent inactivation of ICa was normalized by intracellular dialysis of excess apo-CaM (20 μM), which also partially restored physiological Ca(2+) release refractoriness in Casq2 KO myocytes. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings reveal that the intra-SR protein Casq2 is largely responsible for the phenomenon of SR Ca(2+) release refractoriness in murine ventricular myocytes. We also report a novel mechanism of impaired Ca(2+)-CaM-dependent inactivation of Cav1.2, which contributes to the loss of SR Ca(2+) release refractoriness in the Casq2 KO mouse model and, therefore, may further increase risk for ventricular arrhythmia in vivo.
AIMS: In cardiac muscle, Ca(2+) release from sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) is reduced with successively shorter coupling intervals of premature stimuli, a phenomenon known as SR Ca(2+) release refractoriness. We recently reported that the SR luminal Ca(2+) binding protein calsequestrin 2 (Casq2) contributes to release refractoriness in intact mouse hearts, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we further investigate the mechanisms responsible for physiological release refractoriness. METHODS AND RESULTS: Gene-targeted ablation of Casq2 (Casq2 KO) abolished SR Ca(2+) release refractoriness in isolated mouse ventricular myocytes. Surprisingly, impaired Ca(2+)-dependent inactivation of L-type Ca(2+) current (ICa), which is responsible for triggering SR Ca(2+) release, significantly contributed to loss of Ca(2+) release refractoriness in Casq2 KO myocytes. Recovery from Ca(2+)-dependent inactivation of ICa was significantly accelerated in Casq2 KO compared to wild-type (WT) myocytes. In contrast, voltage-dependent inactivation measured by using Ba(2+) as charge carrier was not significantly different between WT and Casq2 KO myocytes. Ca(2+)-dependent inactivation of ICa was normalized by intracellular dialysis of excess apo-CaM (20 μM), which also partially restored physiological Ca(2+) release refractoriness in Casq2 KO myocytes. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings reveal that the intra-SR protein Casq2 is largely responsible for the phenomenon of SR Ca(2+) release refractoriness in murine ventricular myocytes. We also report a novel mechanism of impaired Ca(2+)-CaM-dependent inactivation of Cav1.2, which contributes to the loss of SR Ca(2+) release refractoriness in the Casq2 KO mouse model and, therefore, may further increase risk for ventricular arrhythmia in vivo.
Authors: F Haeseleer; I Sokal; C L Verlinde; H Erdjument-Bromage; P Tempst; A N Pronin; J L Benovic; R N Fariss; K Palczewski Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2000-01-14 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Zuzana Kubalova; Dmitry Terentyev; Serge Viatchenko-Karpinski; Yoshinori Nishijima; Inna Györke; Radmila Terentyeva; Daise N Q da Cuñha; Arun Sridhar; David S Feldman; Robert L Hamlin; Cynthia A Carnes; Sandor Györke Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-09-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: David M Plank; Atsuko Yatani; Honda Ritsu; Sandra Witt; Betty Glascock; M Jane Lalli; Muthu Periasamy; Celine Fiset; Nancy Benkusky; Hector H Valdivia; Mark A Sussman Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2003-03-20 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Mette Nyegaard; Michael T Overgaard; Mads T Søndergaard; Marta Vranas; Elijah R Behr; Lasse L Hildebrandt; Jacob Lund; Paula L Hedley; A John Camm; Göran Wettrell; Inger Fosdal; Michael Christiansen; Anders D Børglum Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2012-10-05 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Matthew J Wleklinski; Dmytro O Kryshtal; Kyungsoo Kim; Shan S Parikh; Daniel J Blackwell; Isabelle Marty; V Ramesh Iyer; Bjӧrn C Knollmann Journal: Circ Res Date: 2022-09-14 Impact factor: 23.213
Authors: Alejandra Cely-Ortiz; Juan I Felice; Leandro A Díaz-Zegarra; Carlos A Valverde; Marilén Federico; Julieta Palomeque; Xander H T Wehrens; Evangelia G Kranias; Ernesto A Aiello; Elena C Lascano; Jorge A Negroni; Alicia Mattiazzi Journal: J Gen Physiol Date: 2020-11-02 Impact factor: 4.086