| Literature DB >> 25757863 |
C Duncan1, L Perret2, S Palomba2, M Lapine3, B T Kuhlmey4, C Martijn de Sterke4.
Abstract
Nonlinear optical processes, which are of paramount importance in science and technology, involve the generation of new frequencies. This requires phase matching to avoid that light generated at different positions interferes destructively. Of the two original approaches to achieve this, one relies on birefringence in optical crystals, and is therefore limited by the dispersion of naturally occurring materials, whereas the other, quasi-phase-matching, requires direct modulation of material properties, which is not universally possible. To overcome these limitations, we propose to exploit the unique dispersion afforded by hyperbolic metamaterials, where the refractive index can be arbitrarily large. We systematically analyse the ensuing opportunities and demonstrate that hyperbolic phase matching can be achieved with a wide range of material parameters, offering access to the use of nonlinear media for which phase matching cannot be achieved by other means. With the rapid development in the fabrication of hyperbolic metamaterials, our approach is destined to bring significant advantages over conventional techniques for the phase matching of a variety of nonlinear processes.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25757863 PMCID: PMC4355635 DOI: 10.1038/srep08983
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Schematic of a layered hyperbolic medium with coordinate axes; (b) isofrequency surfaces showing: (i) north-south (NS) and (ii) east-west (EW) hyperbolic; (iii) elliptical.
Figure 2Dispersion of the permittivities of (a) GaAs (εd; Ref. 34) and Au (εm; Drude model with plasma frequency 2.1 × 1015 Hz), compared with ε and ε of a layered medium containing (b) 40%, (c) 50% and (d) 60% dielectric.
The four different possibilities which may lead to phase matching of SHG in layered metamaterials
| Case | FF | SH |
|---|---|---|
| (a) | EW | EW |
| (b) | EW | elliptical |
| (c) | EW | NS |
| (d) | NS | NS |
Figure 3Isofrequency plots for the four cases (a)–(d) as summarised in Table 1; (a) solid lines show the limbs of FF and SH EW hyperbolae and dotted lines their linear asymptotes; (b) solid lines show hyperbolic FF and elliptical SH, and the dash dotted line the circular SH ordinary mode; (c) same as (a), but with SH hyperbola NS, and ordinary mode shown dash dotted; (d) same as (a) but with both hyperbolae NS, and ordinary modes shown dash dotted.
Figure 4(a) FF (1064 nm) and SH normal surfaces in k-space for a medium with d = 100 nm, p = 0.85 and εm taken from tabulated values for silver35. Each dashed curve corresponds to a value of the variable εd(ω) and likewise solid curves εd(2ω), as indicated by the calligraphic numerals. Lines of constant angle to the normal are shown dotted. The matching angle solution for AgGaS2 is circled33. The double solid blue line shows the curve ε(ω) = ε(2ω). (b) the same for FF at 1550 nm; (c) same as (a) with the fill fraction p = 0.7; (d) same as (b) with p = 0.75.