Literature DB >> 25757730

Comparison of DNA extraction protocols for the analysis of gut microbiota in fishes.

Andrea M Larsen1, Haitham H Mohammed1, Covadonga R Arias2.   

Abstract

This study investigated the impacts of bacterial DNA extraction methodology on downstream analysis of fish gut microbiota. Feces and intestine samples were taken from three sympatric freshwater fish species with varying diets. Samples were processed immediately (approximately 4 h after capture; fresh), stored at -20 °C for 15 days or preserved in RNAlater® reagent for 15 days. DNA was then extracted using two commercial kits: one designed for animal tissues and one specifically formulated for stool samples. Microbial community fingerprints were generated using ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis. Factors including diversity as depicted by band number, band intensity, repeatability and practicalities such as cost and time were considered. Despite significant differences in microbiota structure, results were similar between feces and intestine samples. Frozen samples were consistently outperformed by other storage methods and the stool kit typically outperformed the tissue kit. Overall, we recommend extraction of bacterial DNA from fresh samples using the stool kit for both sample types. If samples cannot be processed immediately, preservation in RNAlater® is preferred to freezing. Choice of DNA extraction method significantly influences the results of downstream microbial community analysis and thus should be taken into consideration for metadata analysis. © FEMS 2014. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RISA; fish gut; microbial community

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25757730     DOI: 10.1093/femsle/fnu031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett        ISSN: 0378-1097            Impact factor:   2.742


  9 in total

1.  Fish Gut Microbiome: Current Approaches and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Chandni Talwar; Shekhar Nagar; Rup Lal; Ram Krishan Negi
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 2.461

Review 2.  Characterization of the gut microbiome in epidemiologic studies: the multiethnic cohort experience.

Authors:  Benjamin C Fu; Timothy W Randolph; Unhee Lim; Kristine R Monroe; Iona Cheng; Lynne R Wilkens; Loïc Le Marchand; Meredith A J Hullar; Johanna W Lampe
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.797

3.  A Multi-Omics Approach to Evaluate the Quality of Milk Whey Used in Ricotta Cheese Production.

Authors:  Eleonora Sattin; Nadia A Andreani; Lisa Carraro; Rosaria Lucchini; Luca Fasolato; Andrea Telatin; Stefania Balzan; Enrico Novelli; Barbara Simionati; Barbara Cardazzo
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Sampling the fish gill microbiome: a comparison of tissue biopsies and swabs.

Authors:  Morag Clinton; Adam J Wyness; Samuel A M Martin; Andrew S Brierley; David E K Ferrier
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 3.605

5.  Habitat fragmentation is associated to gut microbiota diversity of an endangered primate: implications for conservation.

Authors:  Claudia Barelli; Davide Albanese; Claudio Donati; Massimo Pindo; Chiara Dallago; Francesco Rovero; Duccio Cavalieri; Kieran Michael Tuohy; Heidi Christine Hauffe; Carlotta De Filippo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Selective Manipulation of the Gut Microbiota Improves Immune Status in Vertebrates.

Authors:  Ana Montalban-Arques; Peter De Schryver; Peter Bossier; Gregor Gorkiewicz; Victoriano Mulero; Delbert Monroe Gatlin; Jorge Galindo-Villegas
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 7.561

7.  Species From Feces: Order-Wide Identification of Chiroptera From Guano and Other Non-Invasive Genetic Samples.

Authors:  Faith M Walker; Charles H D Williamson; Daniel E Sanchez; Colin J Sobek; Carol L Chambers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Reliability of a participant-friendly fecal collection method for microbiome analyses: a step towards large sample size investigation.

Authors:  Joanna W Szopinska; Raphaële Gresse; Saskia van der Marel; Jos Boekhorst; Sabina Lukovac; Iris van Swam; Barbara Franke; Harro Timmerman; Clara Belzer; Alejandro Arias Vasquez
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 3.605

9.  Biases during DNA extraction affect characterization of the microbiota associated with larvae of the Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei.

Authors:  Ming Xue; Liyou Wu; Yaoyao He; Huafang Liang; Chongqing Wen
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 2.984

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.