Michela Balconi1, Maria Cotelli2, Michela Brambilla2, Rosa Manenti2, Maura Cosseddu3, Enrico Premi3, Roberto Gasparotti4, Orazio Zanetti5, Alessandro Padovani3, Barbara Borroni3. 1. Research Unit in Affective and Social Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Catholic University, Milan, Italy. 2. Neuropsychology Unit, IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy. 3. Centre for Aging Brain and Neurodegenerative Disorders, Neurology unit, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy. 4. Neuroradiology Unit, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy. 5. Alzheimer Unit, IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported significant deficits in emotion recognition among individuals along the frontotemporal dementia (FTD) spectrum. The basis of emotional impairment is still poorly understood and explicit (emotion appraisal) and implicit (autonomic system activity) responses have not been carefully evaluated. OBJECTIVE: We investigated explicit evaluation of emotions by testing valence and arousal using self-report measures and we also assessed automatic responses to emotional cues, using autonomic measures (skin conductance response and heart rate). METHODS: 16 behavioral variant FTD and 12 agrammatic variants of primary progressive aphasia patients were included. The performance of these patients was compared to a group of 14 patients with Alzheimer's disease and 20 healthy controls. Each subject was required to observe and evaluate affective pictures while autonomic parameters were recorded. RESULTS: FTD patients preserved a functional general competency in terms of valence (correct positive versus negative attribution) and arousal (correct dichotomy between high versus low arousal category) distinction. These patients showed significant changes in autonomic implicit response compared to the other groups. The mismatch between explicit and implicit responsiveness to emotional cues was found both in behavioral variant FTD and in agrammatic variants of primary progressive aphasia. Emotional responsiveness was related to the severity of behavioral abnormalities as measured by the Frontal Behavioral Inventory and associated with atrophy of the left putamen. CONCLUSION: The present findings indicate that FTD patients are able to explicitly "appraise" the emotion, but they cannot implicitly "feel" the emotion. This mismatch between the two levels may help explain the general emotional behavior impairment found in these patients.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported significant deficits in emotion recognition among individuals along the frontotemporal dementia (FTD) spectrum. The basis of emotional impairment is still poorly understood and explicit (emotion appraisal) and implicit (autonomic system activity) responses have not been carefully evaluated. OBJECTIVE: We investigated explicit evaluation of emotions by testing valence and arousal using self-report measures and we also assessed automatic responses to emotional cues, using autonomic measures (skin conductance response and heart rate). METHODS: 16 behavioral variant FTD and 12 agrammatic variants of primary progressive aphasiapatients were included. The performance of these patients was compared to a group of 14 patients with Alzheimer's disease and 20 healthy controls. Each subject was required to observe and evaluate affective pictures while autonomic parameters were recorded. RESULTS:FTDpatients preserved a functional general competency in terms of valence (correct positive versus negative attribution) and arousal (correct dichotomy between high versus low arousal category) distinction. These patients showed significant changes in autonomic implicit response compared to the other groups. The mismatch between explicit and implicit responsiveness to emotional cues was found both in behavioral variant FTD and in agrammatic variants of primary progressive aphasia. Emotional responsiveness was related to the severity of behavioral abnormalities as measured by the Frontal Behavioral Inventory and associated with atrophy of the left putamen. CONCLUSION: The present findings indicate that FTDpatients are able to explicitly "appraise" the emotion, but they cannot implicitly "feel" the emotion. This mismatch between the two levels may help explain the general emotional behavior impairment found in these patients.
Authors: L Kukreja; R Shahidehpour; G Kim; J Keegan; K R Sadleir; T Russell; J Csernansky; M Mesulam; R J Vassar; L Wang; H Dong; C Geula Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2018-05-28 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Camilla N Clark; Hannah L Golden; Oliver McCallion; Jennifer M Nicholas; Miriam H Cohen; Catherine F Slattery; Ross W Paterson; Phillip D Fletcher; Catherine J Mummery; Jonathan D Rohrer; Sebastian J Crutch; Jason D Warren Journal: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 3.436
Authors: Charles R Marshall; Christopher J D Hardy; Micah Allen; Lucy L Russell; Camilla N Clark; Rebecca L Bond; Katrina M Dick; Emilie V Brotherhood; Jonathan D Rohrer; James M Kilner; Jason D Warren Journal: Ann Clin Transl Neurol Date: 2018-04-14 Impact factor: 4.511
Authors: Miriam H Cohen; Amelia M Carton; Christopher J Hardy; Hannah L Golden; Camilla N Clark; Phillip D Fletcher; Kankamol Jaisin; Charles R Marshall; Susie M D Henley; Jonathan D Rohrer; Sebastian J Crutch; Jason D Warren Journal: Neuropsychologia Date: 2015-12-31 Impact factor: 3.139
Authors: Charles R Marshall; Chris J D Hardy; Lucy L Russell; Camilla N Clark; Katrina M Dick; Emilie V Brotherhood; Rebecca L Bond; Catherine J Mummery; Jonathan M Schott; Jonathan D Rohrer; James M Kilner; Jason D Warren Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2017-11-16 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Jackie M Poos; Lize C Jiskoot; Janne M Papma; John C van Swieten; Esther van den Berg Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2018-03-19 Impact factor: 2.892