Literature DB >> 25757481

Cytotoxic and genotoxic evaluation of different synthetic amorphous silica nanomaterials in the V79 cell line.

Y Guichard1, C Fontana2, E Chavinier2, F Terzetti2, L Gaté2, S Binet2, C Darne2.   

Abstract

The nature of occupational risks and hazards in industries that produce or use synthetic amorphous silica (SAS) nanoparticles is still under discussion. Manufactured SAS occur in amorphous form and can be divided into two main types according to the production process, namely, pyrogenic silica (powder) and precipitated silica (powder, gel or colloid). The physical and chemical properties of SAS may vary in terms of particle size, surface area, agglomeration state or purity, and differences in their toxicity potential might therefore be expected. The aim of this study was to compare the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of representative manufactured SAS samples in Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79 cells). Five samples from industrial SAS producers were evaluated, that is, two pyrogenic SAS powders (with primary particle sizes of 20 nm and 25/70 nm), one precipitated SAS powder (20 nm) and two precipitated SAS colloids (15 and 40/80 nm). V79 cell cultures were treated with different concentrations of SAS pre-dispersed in bovine serum albumin -water medium. Pyr (pyrogenic) 20, Pre (precipitated) 20 and Col (colloid) 15 significantly decreased the cell viability after 24 h of exposure, whilst Pyr 25/70 and Col 40/80 had negligible effects. The cytotoxicity of Pyr 20, Pre 20 and Col 15 was revealed by the induction of apoptosis, and Pyr 20 and Col 15 also produced DNA damage. However, none of the SAS samples generated intracellular reactive oxidative species, micronuclei or genomic mutations in V79 cells after 24 h of exposure. Overall, the results of this study show that pyrogenic, precipitated and colloidal manufactured SAS of around 20 nm primary particle size can produce significant cytotoxic and genotoxic effects in V79 cells. In contrast, the coarser-grained pyrogenic and colloid SAS (approximately 50 nm) yielded negligible toxicity, despite having been manufactured by same processes as their finer-grained equivalents. To explain these differences, the influence of particle agglomeration and oxidative species formation is discussed.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HPRT assay; Synthetic amorphous silica; V79 cell line; comet assay; cytotoxicity; micronucleus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25757481     DOI: 10.1177/0748233715572562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Ind Health        ISSN: 0748-2337            Impact factor:   2.273


  16 in total

1.  Autophagy and autophagy dysfunction contribute to apoptosis in HepG2 cells exposed to nanosilica.

Authors:  Yongbo Yu; Junchao Duan; Yang Yu; Yang Li; Yang Zou; Yumei Yang; Lizhen Jiang; Qiuling Li; Zhiwei Sun
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.524

2.  Silica nanoparticles induce start inhibition of meiosis and cell cycle arrest via down-regulating meiotic relevant factors.

Authors:  Jin Zhang; Lihua Ren; Yang Zou; Lianshuang Zhang; Jialiu Wei; Yanbo Li; Ji Wang; Zhiwei Sun; Xianqing Zhou
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.524

Review 3.  Biological monitoring of workers exposed to engineered nanomaterials.

Authors:  P Schulte; V Leso; M Niang; I Iavicoli
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 4.372

4.  Submicron silica particles have cytotoxicities on hepatocellular carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer and breast cancer by unified regulating the XLOC_001659/miR-98-5p/MAP3K2-mediated pathway.

Authors:  Jingdong Shi; Yukun Ci; Ying Zheng; Wenhui Chen; Xi Chen
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 2.680

5.  Hazard Assessment of Benchmark Metal-Based Nanomaterials Through a Set of In Vitro Genotoxicity Assays.

Authors:  Maria Dušinská; Maria João Silva; Nádia Vital; Mariana Pinhão; Naouale El Yamani; Elise Rundén-Pran; Henriqueta Louro
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.650

6.  An In Vitro Study on the Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Silver Sulfide Quantum Dots Coated with Meso-2,3-dimercaptosuccinic Acid.

Authors:  Deniz Özkan Vardar; Sevtap Aydin; İbrahim Hocaoğlu; Havva Yağci Acar; Nursen Başaran
Journal:  Turk J Pharm Sci       Date:  2019-07-10

Review 7.  Toxicology of silica nanoparticles: an update.

Authors:  Sivakumar Murugadoss; Dominique Lison; Lode Godderis; Sybille Van Den Brule; Jan Mast; Frederic Brassinne; Noham Sebaihi; Peter H Hoet
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 5.153

8.  The toxicity of SiO2 NPs on cell proliferation and cellular uptake of human lung fibroblastic cell line during the variation of calcination temperature and its modeling by artificial neural network.

Authors:  Fariba Abbasi; Mohammad Reza Samaei; Hassan Hashemi; Amir Savardashtaki; Abooalfazl Azhdarpoor; Mohammad Javad Fallahi; Mahrokh Jalili; Sylvain Billet
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2021-04-30

9.  Genotoxicity and Gene Expression in the Rat Lung Tissue following Instillation and Inhalation of Different Variants of Amorphous Silica Nanomaterials (aSiO2 NM).

Authors:  Fátima Brandão; Carla Costa; Maria João Bessa; Elise Dumortier; Florence Debacq-Chainiaux; Roland Hubaux; Michel Salmon; Julie Laloy; Miruna S Stan; Anca Hermenean; Sami Gharbia; Anca Dinischiotu; Anne Bannuscher; Bryan Hellack; Andrea Haase; Sónia Fraga; João Paulo Teixeira
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 5.076

10.  Oxidative stress, inflammation, and DNA damage in multiple organs of mice acutely exposed to amorphous silica nanoparticles.

Authors:  Abderrahim Nemmar; Priya Yuvaraju; Sumaya Beegam; Javed Yasin; Elsadig E Kazzam; Badreldin H Ali
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2016-03-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.