Literature DB >> 25757445

Proximal Roux-en-Y gastric bypass alters drug absorption pattern but not systemic exposure of CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein substrates.

Lingtak-Neander Chan1, Yvonne S Lin, Jessica C Tay-Sontheimer, Dorothy Trawick, Brant K Oelschlager, David R Flum, Kristen K Patton, Danny D Shen, John R Horn.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (RYGB) on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam (a CYP3A4 substrate) and digoxin (a P-glycoprotein substrate).
DESIGN: Prospective, nonblinded, longitudinal, single-dose pharmacokinetic study in three phases: presurgery baseline and postoperative assessments at 3 and 12 months. PATIENTS: Twelve obese patients meeting current standards for bariatric surgery.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: At each study visit, patients received a single dose of oral digoxin and midazolam at 8 a.m. Blood samples were collected at regular intervals for 24 hours after dosing. Continuous 12-lead electrocardiogram (EKG), heart rate, blood pressure, and respiratory rate were monitored, and pharmacokinetic parameters from the three visits were compared. The peak plasma concentration (Cmax ) of midazolam increased by 66% and 71% at 3- and 12-month post-RYGB (p=0.017 and p=0.001, respectively), whereas the median time to peak concentration (Tmax ) was reduced by 50%. The mean Cmax for 1'-hydroxymidazolam increased by 87% and 80% at 3 and 12 months (p=0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). However, neither the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) for midazolam nor the metabolite-to-parent AUC ratio changed significantly over time. For digoxin, the median Tmax decreased from 40 minutes at baseline to 30 and 20 minutes at 3 and 12 months, respectively. The mean AUC for digoxin, heart rate, and EKG patterns were similar across the three study phases.
CONCLUSION: Contemporary proximal RYGB increases the rate of drug absorption without significantly changing the overall exposure to midazolam and digoxin. The Cmax of a CYP3A4 substrate with a high extraction ratio was substantially increased after RYGB.
© 2015 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CYP3A4; P-glycoprotein; Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; absorption; bariatric surgery; obesity; pharmacokinetics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25757445      PMCID: PMC4696861          DOI: 10.1002/phar.1560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacotherapy        ISSN: 0277-0008            Impact factor:   4.705


  32 in total

1.  Predicting drug candidate victims of drug-drug interactions, using microdosing.

Authors:  Marie Croft; Brendan Keely; Ian Morris; Lan Tann; Graham Lappin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Interplay of metabolism and transport in determining oral drug absorption and gut wall metabolism: a simulation assessment using the "Advanced Dissolution, Absorption, Metabolism (ADAM)" model.

Authors:  A S Darwich; S Neuhoff; M Jamei; A Rostami-Hodjegan
Journal:  Curr Drug Metab       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.731

Review 3.  A systematic review of drug absorption following bariatric surgery and its theoretical implications.

Authors:  R Padwal; D Brocks; A M Sharma
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 9.213

Review 4.  Influence of bariatric surgery on the use and pharmacokinetics of some major drug classes.

Authors:  Jan Peter Yska; Susanne van der Linde; Véronique V Tapper; Jan A Apers; Marloes Emous; Erik R Totté; Bob Wilffert; Eric N van Roon
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Prevalence of obesity in the United States, 2009-2010.

Authors:  Cynthia L Ogden; Margaret D Carroll; Brian K Kit; Katherine M Flegal
Journal:  NCHS Data Brief       Date:  2012-01

Review 6.  Pharmacokinetic considerations in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients.

Authors:  April Smith; Brian Henriksen; Andrew Cohen
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 2.637

7.  Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2011.

Authors:  Henry Buchwald; Danette M Oien
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Bariatric surgery and prevention of type 2 diabetes in Swedish obese subjects.

Authors:  Lena M S Carlsson; Markku Peltonen; Sofie Ahlin; Åsa Anveden; Claude Bouchard; Björn Carlsson; Peter Jacobson; Hans Lönroth; Cristina Maglio; Ingmar Näslund; Carlo Pirazzi; Stefano Romeo; Kajsa Sjöholm; Elisabeth Sjöström; Hans Wedel; Per-Arne Svensson; Lars Sjöström
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Impact of OATP1B1, MDR1, and CYP3A4 expression in liver and intestine on interpatient pharmacokinetic variability of atorvastatin in obese subjects.

Authors:  M Ulvestad; I B Skottheim; G S Jakobsen; S Bremer; E Molden; A Asberg; J Hjelmesæth; T B Andersson; R Sandbu; H Christensen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Gastric bypass surgery is followed by lowered blood pressure and increased diuresis - long term results from the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) study.

Authors:  Peter Hallersund; Lars Sjöström; Torsten Olbers; Hans Lönroth; Peter Jacobson; Ville Wallenius; Ingmar Näslund; Lena M Carlsson; Lars Fändriks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  RYGB and Drug Disposition: How to Do Better? Analysis of Pharmacokinetic Studies and Recommendations for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Lorry Hachon; Xavier Declèves; Pauline Faucher; Claire Carette; Célia Lloret-Linares
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Systematic review of drug bioavailability following gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Manuela Moreno Santamaría; José Javier Arenas Villafranca; Jimena Abilés; Alberto Fernández López; Lucia Visiedo Rodas; Begoña Tortajada Goitia; Pilar Utrilla Navarro
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 3. 

Authors:  Sabrina Lorico; Blaine Colton
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 4.  Effect of major gastrointestinal tract surgery on the absorption and efficacy of direct acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs).

Authors:  Hakeam A Hakeam; Nasser Al-Sanea
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 5.  Psychotropic Medications in Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: Research Updates and Clinical Considerations.

Authors:  Janelle W Coughlin; Kristine J Steffen; Sanjeev Sockalingam; James E Mitchell
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 6.  Oral Contraceptives after Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Joël Schlatter
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 3.942

Review 7.  Medication management and pharmacokinetic changes after bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Sabrina Lorico; Blaine Colton
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Impact of body weight, low energy diet and gastric bypass on drug bioavailability, cardiovascular risk factors and metabolic biomarkers: protocol for an open, non-randomised, three-armed single centre study (COCKTAIL).

Authors:  Jøran Hjelmesæth; Anders Åsberg; Shalini Andersson; Rune Sandbu; Ida Robertsen; Line Kristin Johnson; Philip Carlo Angeles; Jens Kristoffer Hertel; Eva Skovlund; Maria Heijer; Anna-Lena Ek; Veronica Krogstad; Tor-Ivar Karlsen; Hege Christensen; Tommy B Andersson; Cecilia Karlsson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 9.  Nanotechnology as a tool to overcome the bariatric surgery malabsorption.

Authors:  Osaid Almeanazel; Fars Alanazi; Ibrahim Alsarra; Doaa Alshora; Faiyaz Shakeel; Ahmad Almnaizel; Mohammed Alahmed; Ehab Fouad
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  The influence of bariatric surgery on oral drug bioavailability in patients with obesity: A systematic review.

Authors:  Philip Carlo Angeles; Ida Robertsen; Lars Thomas Seeberg; Veronica Krogstad; Julie Skattebu; Rune Sandbu; Anders Åsberg; Jøran Hjelmesaeth
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 9.213

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.