PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the knowledge of Brazilian dentists (DEN) and dental students (DS) about bisphosphonates (BP) and bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ). METHODS: A convenience sample of 104 DEN and 100 DS was randomly selected and invited to answer a questionnaire. The questionnaire was structured on the basis of the main information about BP and the risk factors associated with the development of BRONJ. The data obtained were analyzed by the chi-square and Fisher's exact tests, considering significance of 5%. RESULTS: Seventy-five (72.1%) DEN and 75 (75%) DS did not know the BP cited in the questionnaire (p < 0.0001), and their commercial brand names were not recognized by 88 (84.6%) DEN and 86 (86%) DS (p < 0.0001). In the same way, 62 (59.6%) DEN (p = 0.04) and 58 (58%) DS (p < 0.0001) did not recognize BRONJ as an oral side effect of BP or point out oral conditions that were not associated with the use of BP. CONCLUSIONS: Practical initiatives, such as free lectures and workshops, must be taken to broaden the knowledge of DEN and DS about BP and thus contribute to the prevention of BRONJ.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the knowledge of Brazilian dentists (DEN) and dental students (DS) about bisphosphonates (BP) and bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ). METHODS: A convenience sample of 104 DEN and 100 DS was randomly selected and invited to answer a questionnaire. The questionnaire was structured on the basis of the main information about BP and the risk factors associated with the development of BRONJ. The data obtained were analyzed by the chi-square and Fisher's exact tests, considering significance of 5%. RESULTS: Seventy-five (72.1%) DEN and 75 (75%) DS did not know the BP cited in the questionnaire (p < 0.0001), and their commercial brand names were not recognized by 88 (84.6%) DEN and 86 (86%) DS (p < 0.0001). In the same way, 62 (59.6%) DEN (p = 0.04) and 58 (58%) DS (p < 0.0001) did not recognize BRONJ as an oral side effect of BP or point out oral conditions that were not associated with the use of BP. CONCLUSIONS: Practical initiatives, such as free lectures and workshops, must be taken to broaden the knowledge of DEN and DS about BP and thus contribute to the prevention of BRONJ.
Authors: Salvatore L Ruggiero; Thomas B Dodson; Leon A Assael; Regina Landesberg; Robert E Marx; Bhoomi Mehrotra Journal: J Oral Maxillofac Surg Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 1.895
Authors: Sven Otto; Christian Schreyer; Sigurd Hafner; Gerson Mast; Michael Ehrenfeld; Stephen Stürzenbaum; Christoph Pautke Journal: J Craniomaxillofac Surg Date: 2011-06-14 Impact factor: 2.078
Authors: F Saad; J E Brown; C Van Poznak; T Ibrahim; S M Stemmer; A T Stopeck; I J Diel; S Takahashi; N Shore; D H Henry; C H Barrios; T Facon; F Senecal; K Fizazi; L Zhou; A Daniels; P Carrière; R Dansey Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2011-10-10 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Ana Laura Soares; Sérgio Simon; Luiz Henrique Gebrim; Afonso Celso P Nazário; Marise Lazaretti-Castro Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-08-29 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Wanessa Miranda-Silva; Marco Aurélio Montezuma; Bernar Monteiro Benites; Julia Stephanie Bruno; Felipe Paiva Fonseca; Eduardo Rodrigues Fregnani Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-03-06 Impact factor: 3.603