| Literature DB >> 25757090 |
Hajime Ohtsuki1, Tamotsu Awano1, Narumi K Tsugeki1, Seiji Ishida1, Hirotaka Oda2, Wataru Makino1, Jotaro Urabe1.
Abstract
To examine if changes in species composition of a plankton community in the past due to anthropogenic activities can be clarified in lakes without any monitoring data, we analyzed genetically ephippial carapaces ofEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25757090 PMCID: PMC4355284 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119767
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Photomicrograph as examples of ephippial carapaces of D. longispina group (above) and D. pulex (below) collected from sediment of Lake Hataya Ohnuma.
Those carapaces were used for DNA extraction and were identified their species by genetic analysis.
Fig 2Profiles of magnetic susceptibilities in four cores of lake sediments from Lake Hataya Ohnuma.
A peak and troughs of the magnetic susceptibilities in 1997 (6–7 cm), 1974 (20–21 cm) and 1951 (30–31 cm) in core A1 were used for developing chronologies of cores A2, B2 and B3. Sediment layers corresponded to the peak and toughs in core A1 are connected with dotted lines.
Fig 3Fluxes of total phosphorus and phytoplankton pigments.
Fluxes of inaccurately estimated chronological years are denoted by broken lines. Two periods (I and II) are indicated by the cluster analysis in Fig. 4 and are divided by thin line.
Fig 4Result of the cluster analysis (a) and principal component analysis (b) using fluxes of fossil pigments.
(a) Two distinctly divided periods are denoted by a gray line (period I) and dark gray line (period II). (b) Chronological years of sediment layers are denoted by open circles (period I) and closed circles (period II), and projection of vector variables of fossil pigments are denoted by gray arrows with abbreviations of pigment names, Ch: chlorophyll-a and pheophytin-a, Fu: fucoxanthin, Di: diatoxanthin, Al: alloxanthin, Lu: lutein, Ze: zeaxanthin, and Ec: echinenone.
Fig 5Fluxes of protozoan zooplankton remains.
Fluxes of inaccurately estimated chronological years are denoted by broken lines. Two distinct periods (I and II) from the cluster analysis in Fig. 4 are divided by a thin line.
Fig 6Fluxes of crustacean zooplankton remains.
Fluxes of inaccurately estimated chronological years are denoted by broken lines. Two distinct periods (I and II) from the cluster analysis in Fig. 4 are divided by a thin line.
Fig 7Ephippial carapace fluxes of Daphnia (a), and frequency of empty ephippial carapaces (b).
Open circles indicate zero values. Fluxes of inaccurately estimated chronological years are denoted by broken lines. Two distinct periods (I and II) from the cluster analysis in Fig. 4 are divided by a thin line.
Fig 8Number of ephippial carapaces with haplotypes D1, D2, G and D. pulex in different chronological layers.
Total of 334 ECs were successfully analyzed. Two distinctly divided periods are denoted by a gray line (period I) and dark gray line (period II). Inaccurately estimated chronological years are shown with a broken underline.