Literature DB >> 25756188

Adaptive mutations alter antibody structure and dynamics during affinity maturation.

Ramkrishna Adhikary, Wayne Yu, Masayuki Oda1, Ross C Walker2, Tingjian Chen, Robyn L Stanfield, Ian A Wilson, Jörg Zimmermann, Floyd E Romesberg.   

Abstract

While adaptive mutations can bestow new functions on proteins via the introduction or optimization of reactive centers, or other structural changes, a role for the optimization of protein dynamics also seems likely but has been more difficult to evaluate. Antibody (Ab) affinity maturation is an example of adaptive evolution wherein the adaptive mutations may be identified and Abs may be raised to specific targets that facilitate the characterization of protein dynamics. Here, we report the characterization of three affinity matured Abs that evolved from a common germline precursor to bind the chromophoric antigen (Ag), 8-methoxypyrene-1,3,6-trisulfonate (MPTS). In addition to characterizing the sequence, molecular recognition, and structure of each Ab, we characterized the dynamics of each complex by determining their mechanical response to an applied force via three-pulse photon echo peak shift (3PEPS) spectroscopy and deconvoluting the response into elastic, anelastic, and plastic components. We find that for one Ab, affinity maturation was accomplished via the introduction of a single functional group that mediates a direct contact with MPTS and results in a complex with little anelasticity or plasticity. In the other two cases, more mutations were introduced but none directly contact MPTS, and while their effects on structure are subtle, their effects on anelasticity and plasticity are significant, with the level of plasticity correlated with specificity, suggesting that the optimization of protein dynamics may have contributed to affinity maturation. A similar optimization of structure and dynamics may contribute to the evolution of other proteins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25756188      PMCID: PMC5061043          DOI: 10.1021/bi501417q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  28 in total

1.  Kinetics of desolvation-mediated protein-protein binding.

Authors:  C J Camacho; S R Kimura; C DeLisi; S Vajda
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Protein dynamics and the immunological evolution of molecular recognition.

Authors:  Ralph Jimenez; Georgina Salazar; Jun Yin; Taiha Joo; Floyd E Romesberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-03-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Crystal structure of an ancient protein: evolution by conformational epistasis.

Authors:  Eric A Ortlund; Jamie T Bridgham; Matthew R Redinbo; Joseph W Thornton
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Identical V region amino acid sequences and segments of sequences in antibodies of different specificities. Relative contributions of VH and VL genes, minigenes, and complementarity-determining regions to binding of antibody-combining sites.

Authors:  E A Kabat; T T Wu
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1991-09-01       Impact factor: 5.422

5.  Structural insights into the evolution of an antibody combining site.

Authors:  G J Wedemayer; P A Patten; L H Wang; P G Schultz; R C Stevens
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-06-13       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  The dynamic nature of the antibody repertoire.

Authors:  C Berek; C Milstein
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 12.988

Review 7.  Mutation drift and repertoire shift in the maturation of the immune response.

Authors:  C Berek; C Milstein
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 12.988

8.  Features and development of Coot.

Authors:  P Emsley; B Lohkamp; W G Scott; K Cowtan
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2010-03-24

9.  In situ studies of the primary immune response to (4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)acetyl. III. The kinetics of V region mutation and selection in germinal center B cells.

Authors:  J Jacob; J Przylepa; C Miller; G Kelsoe
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1993-10-01       Impact factor: 14.307

10.  Phaser crystallographic software.

Authors:  Airlie J McCoy; Ralf W Grosse-Kunstleve; Paul D Adams; Martyn D Winn; Laurent C Storoni; Randy J Read
Journal:  J Appl Crystallogr       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 3.304

View more
  16 in total

1.  Directed evolution of a picomolar-affinity, high-specificity antibody targeting phosphorylated tau.

Authors:  Dan Li; Lei Wang; Brandon F Maziuk; Xudong Yao; Benjamin Wolozin; Yong Ku Cho
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Therapeutic Antibodies to Ganglioside GD2 Evolved from Highly Selective Germline Antibodies.

Authors:  Eric Sterner; Megan L Peach; Marc C Nicklaus; Jeffrey C Gildersleeve
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 9.423

3.  Targeting Stereotyped B Cell Receptors from Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients with Synthetic Antigen Surrogates.

Authors:  Mohosin Sarkar; Yun Liu; Junpeng Qi; Haiyong Peng; Jumpei Morimoto; Christoph Rader; Nicholas Chiorazzi; Thomas Kodadek
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Flexibility and Design: Conformational Heterogeneity along the Evolutionary Trajectory of a Redesigned Ubiquitin.

Authors:  Justin T Biel; Michael C Thompson; Christian N Cunningham; Jacob E Corn; James S Fraser
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 5.006

5.  Structure and Dynamics of Stacking Interactions in an Antibody Binding Site.

Authors:  Ramkrishna Adhikary; Jörg Zimmermann; Robyn L Stanfield; Ian A Wilson; Wayne Yu; Masayuki Oda; Floyd E Romesberg
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  The Combining Sites of Anti-lipid A Antibodies Reveal a Widely Utilized Motif Specific for Negatively Charged Groups.

Authors:  Omid Haji-Ghassemi; Sven Müller-Loennies; Teresa Rodriguez; Lore Brade; Hans-Dieter Grimmecke; Helmut Brade; Stephen V Evans
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  The Unusual Genetics and Biochemistry of Bovine Immunoglobulins.

Authors:  Robyn L Stanfield; Jeremy Haakenson; Thaddeus C Deiss; Michael F Criscitiello; Ian A Wilson; Vaughn V Smider
Journal:  Adv Immunol       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 3.543

8.  Destabilizing an interacting motif strengthens the association of a designed ankyrin repeat protein with tubulin.

Authors:  Shoeb Ahmad; Ludovic Pecqueur; Birgit Dreier; Djemel Hamdane; Magali Aumont-Nicaise; Andreas Plückthun; Marcel Knossow; Benoît Gigant
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Repertoire Analysis of Antibody CDR-H3 Loops Suggests Affinity Maturation Does Not Typically Result in Rigidification.

Authors:  Jeliazko R Jeliazkov; Adnan Sljoka; Daisuke Kuroda; Nobuyuki Tsuchimura; Naoki Katoh; Kouhei Tsumoto; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 7.561

10.  Characterizing the Diversity of the CDR-H3 Loop Conformational Ensembles in Relationship to Antibody Binding Properties.

Authors:  Monica L Fernández-Quintero; Johannes R Loeffler; Johannes Kraml; Ursula Kahler; Anna S Kamenik; Klaus R Liedl
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.