Literature DB >> 25756079

Quality of life after septorhinoplasty measured with the Functional Rhinoplasty Outcome Inventory 17 (FROI-17).

Olcay Cem Bulut, Frank Wallner, Peter K Plinkert, Sebastian Prochnow, Christoph Kuhnt, Ingo Baumann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Quality of life measurements in septorhinoplasty patients so far have taken place only to a small extent. The aim of the present study was a prospective measurement of disease-specific quality of life with a newly developed and validated instrument, the Functional Rhinoplasty Outcome Inventory 17 (FROI-17).
METHODS: The patients completed the FROI-17 and the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) as disease-specific instruments preoperatively as well as 12 months postoperatively. As a general instrument, the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) was used. Furthermore, additional general questions were answered at both time points.
RESULTS: Out of the 103 patients, 69 patients (32 men, 37 women) responded after 12 months (response rate 67%). Thirteen patients (18%) were not satisfied with the result of surgery. However, all scales of FROI-17 and also ROE showed a significant postoperative improvement of subjective assessments by the patients. In the SF-36, this was true in 2 out of 8 scales (mental health and role-functioning physical). Furthermore, we found significant correlations between the FROI-17 and the SF-36 scales but not between the ROE and the SF-36 scales.
CONCLUSION: The disease-specific quality of life was significantly improved by septorhinoplasty. FROI-17 scales detect more functional aspects compared with the ROE thus establishing significant correlations with general quality of life measured by SF-36. The application of both FROI-17 and ROE in future clinical trials in septorhinoplasty patients is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25756079     DOI: 10.4193/Rhino14.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rhinology        ISSN: 0300-0729            Impact factor:   3.681


  7 in total

1.  Quality of life in functional rhinoplasty: rhinoplasty outcomes evaluation German version (ROE-D).

Authors:  Olcay Cem Bulut; Peter K Plinkert; Frank Wallner; Ingo Baumann
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Long-term quality of life changes after primary septorhinoplasty.

Authors:  Olcay Cem Bulut; Frank Wallner; Dare Oladokun; Claire Kayser; Michaela Plath; Eric Schulz; Peter Karl Plinkert; Ingo Baumann
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Impact of Le-Fort I osteotomy on anatomical and functional aspects of the nasal airway and on quality of life.

Authors:  Karim Zaoui; Reinald Kuehle; Ingo Baumann; Dorothee Laura Schuessler; Oliver Ristow; Michaela Plath; Christian Freudlsperger
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  Evidence and evidence gaps in therapies of nasal obstruction and rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Nicole Rotter
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-12-15

5.  Satisfaction in Patients After Rhinoplasty Using the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation Questionnaire.

Authors:  Nasir Khan; Mamoon Rashid; Ibrahim Khan; Saad Ur Rehman Sarwar; Haroon Ur Rashid; Mariam Khurshid; Usama Khalid Choudry; Noor Fatima
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-07-30

6.  How to predict the outcome of septorhinoplasty? A normative study of ROE and FROI-17 scores.

Authors:  Michaela Plath; Matthias Sand; Carlo Cavaliere; Peter K Plinkert; Ingo Baumann; Karim Zaoui
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 2.124

7.  Tumor Control and Quality of Life in Skin Cancer Patients With Extensive Multilayered Nasal Defects.

Authors:  Michaela Plath; Hannah M Thielen; Ingo Baumann; Karim Zaoui; Philippe A Federspil
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-08-03       Impact factor: 3.372

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.