Barjesh C Sharma1, Ajay Kumar1, Vishal Garg1, Ravi S Reddy1, Puja Sakhuja2, Shiv K Sarin1. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, G B Pant Hospital, New Delhi 110002, India. 2. Department of Gastroenterology, G B Pant Hospital, New Delhi 110002, India ; Department of Pathology, G B Pant Hospital, New Delhi 110002, India.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) involves increased hepatic macrosteatosis due to increased insulin resistance and non-hepatic processes including oxidative stress, apoptosis, and increased pro-inflammatory cytokines. Present study compared the efficacy of pentoxifylline and pioglitazone therapy in improving the metabolic factors and liver histology in patients with NASH. METHODS:Sixty consecutive biopsy proven NASH patients aged 18-70 years with ALT > 1.2 times the upper limit of normal were randomized to receive either pentoxifylline 1200 mg/day in three divided doses orally every day or pioglitazone (30 mg/day) daily for 6 months. All the patients were also instructed to reduce their calorie intake by 500 kcal/day as well as to perform modest exercise (brisk walking) regularly at least 5 days per week. Before and after treatment, liver function tests, serum insulin, C-peptide levels, TNF-α, adiponectin, leptin levels, HOMA-IR and hepatocyte injury and fibrosis scores on liver histology were assessed. RESULTS: Both pentoxifylline and pioglitazone were effective in improving transaminases, insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and adiponectin levels significantly. TNF-α levels improved with either of the drugs but did not achieve significant levels. Both the drugs improved the markers of acute liver injury. However, only steatosis improved significantly with either of the drugs. Patients treated with pioglitazone had significant improvement in lobular inflammation, portal inflammation and Brunts grade. Brunts grade improved significantly with pioglitazone as compared to pentoxifylline at the end of the therapy. CONCLUSIONS:Pioglitazone shows better improvement in both metabolic factors and liver histology in patients with NASH compared to pentoxifylline.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) involves increased hepatic macrosteatosis due to increased insulin resistance and non-hepatic processes including oxidative stress, apoptosis, and increased pro-inflammatory cytokines. Present study compared the efficacy of pentoxifylline and pioglitazone therapy in improving the metabolic factors and liver histology in patients with NASH. METHODS: Sixty consecutive biopsy proven NASH patients aged 18-70 years with ALT > 1.2 times the upper limit of normal were randomized to receive either pentoxifylline 1200 mg/day in three divided doses orally every day or pioglitazone (30 mg/day) daily for 6 months. All the patients were also instructed to reduce their calorie intake by 500 kcal/day as well as to perform modest exercise (brisk walking) regularly at least 5 days per week. Before and after treatment, liver function tests, serum insulin, C-peptide levels, TNF-α, adiponectin, leptin levels, HOMA-IR and hepatocyte injury and fibrosis scores on liver histology were assessed. RESULTS: Both pentoxifylline and pioglitazone were effective in improving transaminases, insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and adiponectin levels significantly. TNF-α levels improved with either of the drugs but did not achieve significant levels. Both the drugs improved the markers of acute liver injury. However, only steatosis improved significantly with either of the drugs. Patients treated with pioglitazone had significant improvement in lobular inflammation, portal inflammation and Brunts grade. Brunts grade improved significantly with pioglitazone as compared to pentoxifylline at the end of the therapy. CONCLUSIONS:Pioglitazone shows better improvement in both metabolic factors and liver histology in patients with NASH compared to pentoxifylline.
Authors: J Crespo; A Cayón; P Fernández-Gil; M Hernández-Guerra; M Mayorga; A Domínguez-Díez; J C Fernández-Escalante; F Pons-Romero Journal: Hepatology Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Renata Belfort; Stephen A Harrison; Kenneth Brown; Celia Darland; Joan Finch; Jean Hardies; Bogdan Balas; Amalia Gastaldelli; Fermin Tio; Joseph Pulcini; Rachele Berria; Jennie Z Ma; Sunil Dwivedi; Russell Havranek; Chris Fincke; Ralph DeFronzo; George A Bannayan; Steven Schenker; Kenneth Cusi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-11-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Pouneh Mofrad; Melissa J Contos; Mahmadul Haque; Carol Sargeant; Robert A Fisher; Velimir A Luketic; Richard K Sterling; Mitchell L Shiffman; Richard T Stravitz; Arun J Sanyal Journal: Hepatology Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Kittichai Promrat; Glen Lutchman; Gabriel I Uwaifo; Renee J Freedman; Alejandro Soza; Theo Heller; Edward Doo; Marc Ghany; Ahalya Premkumar; Yoon Park; T Jake Liang; Jack A Yanovski; David E Kleiner; Jay H Hoofnagle Journal: Hepatology Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Valerio Rosato; Mario Masarone; Marcello Dallio; Alessandro Federico; Andrea Aglitti; Marcello Persico Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-09-14 Impact factor: 3.390