Literature DB >> 25755175

Observation-status patients in children's hospitals with and without dedicated observation units in 2011.

Michelle L Macy1, Matthew Hall2, Elizabeth R Alpern3, Evan S Fieldston4, Leticia A Shanley5, Carla Hronek, Paul D Hain5, Samir S Shah6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pediatric observation units (OUs) have demonstrated reductions in lengths of stay (LOS) and costs of care. Hospital-level outcomes across all observation-status stays have not been evaluated in relation to the presence of a dedicated OU in the hospital.
OBJECTIVE: To compare observation-status stay outcomes in hospitals with and without a dedicated OU.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of hospital administrative data.
METHODS: Observation-status stay outcomes were compared in hospitals with and without a dedicated OU across 4 categories: (1) LOS, (2) standardized costs, (3) conversion to inpatient status, and (4) return care. SETTING/PATIENTS: Observation-status stays in 31 free-standing children's hospitals contributing observation patient data to the Pediatric Health Information System database, 2011.
RESULTS: Fifty-one percent of the 136,239 observation-status stays in 2011 occurred in 14 hospitals with a dedicated OU; the remainder were in 17 hospitals without. The percentage of observation-status same-day discharges was higher in hospitals with a dedicated OU compared with hospitals without (23.8 vs 22.1, P < 0.001), but risk-adjusted LOS in hours and total standardized costs were similar. Conversion to inpatient status was higher in hospitals with a dedicated OU (11.06%) compared with hospitals without (9.63%, P < 0.01). Adjusted odds of return visits and readmissions were comparable.
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a dedicated OU appears to have an influence on same-day and morning discharges across all observation-status stays without impacting other hospital-level outcomes. Inclusion of location of care (eg, dedicated OU, inpatient unit, emergency department) in hospital administrative datasets would allow for more meaningful comparisons of models of hospital care.
© 2015 Society of Hospital Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25755175     DOI: 10.1002/jhm.2339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Med        ISSN: 1553-5592            Impact factor:   2.960


  2 in total

1.  Estimating Resource Utilization in Congenital Heart Surgery.

Authors:  Sara K Pasquali; Karen Chiswell; Matt Hall; Dylan Thibault; Jennifer C Romano; J William Gaynor; David M Shahian; Marshall L Jacobs; Michael G Gaies; Sean M O'Brien; Edward C Norton; Kevin D Hill; Patricia A Cowper; Nelangi M Pinto; Samir S Shah; John E Mayer; Jeffrey P Jacobs
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Are Rural and Urban Emergency Departments Equally Prepared to Reduce Avoidable Hospitalizations?

Authors:  Margaret B Greenwood-Ericksen; Michelle L Macy; Jason Ham; Michele M Nypaver; Melissa Zochowski; Keith E Kocher
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2019-04-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.