Ana P Kiess1, Jedd D Wolchok2, Christopher A Barker3, Michael A Postow2, Viviane Tabar4, Jason T Huse5, Timothy A Chan3, Yoshiya Yamada3, Kathryn Beal6. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 2. Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 5. Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 6. Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Electronic address: bealk@mskcc.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Ipilimumab (Ipi), a monoclonal antibody against cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4, has been shown to improve survival in patients with metastatic melanoma. In this single-institution study, we investigated the safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for patients with melanoma brain metastases (BMs) who also received Ipi. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 2005 to 2011, 46 patients with melanoma received Ipi and underwent single-fraction SRS for BMs. A total of 113 BMs (91% intact, 9% postoperative) were treated with a median dose of 21 Gy (range, 15-24 Gy). Ipi was given at 3 mg/kg (54%) or 10 mg/kg (46%) for a median of 4 doses (range, 1-21). Adverse events were recorded with the use of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 3.0. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate survival, and Cox regression was used to investigate associations. RESULTS: Fifteen patients received SRS during Ipi, 19 received SRS before Ipi, and 12 received SRS after Ipi. Overall survival (OS) was significantly associated with the timing of SRS/Ipi (P=.035) and melanoma-specific graded prognostic assessment (P=.013). Patients treated with SRS during or before Ipi had better OS and less regional recurrence than did those treated with SRS after Ipi (1-year OS 65% vs 56% vs 40%, P=.008; 1-year regional recurrence 69% vs 64% vs 92%, P=.003). SRS during Ipi also yielded a trend toward less local recurrence than did SRS before or after Ipi (1-year local recurrence 0% vs 13% vs 11%, P=.21). On magnetic resonance imaging, an increase in BM diameter to >150% was seen in 50% of patients treated during or before Ipi but in only 13% of patients treated after Ipi. Grade 3 to 4 toxicities were seen in 20% of patients. CONCLUSION: Overall, the combination of Ipi and SRS appears to be well tolerated. Concurrent delivery of Ipi and SRS is associated with favorable locoregional control and possibly longer survival. It may also cause a temporary increase in tumor size, possibly because of an enhanced immunomodulatory effect.
PURPOSE:Ipilimumab (Ipi), a monoclonal antibody against cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4, has been shown to improve survival in patients with metastatic melanoma. In this single-institution study, we investigated the safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for patients with melanoma brain metastases (BMs) who also received Ipi. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 2005 to 2011, 46 patients with melanoma received Ipi and underwent single-fraction SRS for BMs. A total of 113 BMs (91% intact, 9% postoperative) were treated with a median dose of 21 Gy (range, 15-24 Gy). Ipi was given at 3 mg/kg (54%) or 10 mg/kg (46%) for a median of 4 doses (range, 1-21). Adverse events were recorded with the use of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 3.0. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate survival, and Cox regression was used to investigate associations. RESULTS: Fifteen patients received SRS during Ipi, 19 received SRS before Ipi, and 12 received SRS after Ipi. Overall survival (OS) was significantly associated with the timing of SRS/Ipi (P=.035) and melanoma-specific graded prognostic assessment (P=.013). Patients treated with SRS during or before Ipi had better OS and less regional recurrence than did those treated with SRS after Ipi (1-year OS 65% vs 56% vs 40%, P=.008; 1-year regional recurrence 69% vs 64% vs 92%, P=.003). SRS during Ipi also yielded a trend toward less local recurrence than did SRS before or after Ipi (1-year local recurrence 0% vs 13% vs 11%, P=.21). On magnetic resonance imaging, an increase in BM diameter to >150% was seen in 50% of patients treated during or before Ipi but in only 13% of patients treated after Ipi. Grade 3 to 4 toxicities were seen in 20% of patients. CONCLUSION: Overall, the combination of Ipi and SRS appears to be well tolerated. Concurrent delivery of Ipi and SRS is associated with favorable locoregional control and possibly longer survival. It may also cause a temporary increase in tumor size, possibly because of an enhanced immunomodulatory effect.
Authors: Donald N Liew; Hideyuki Kano; Douglas Kondziolka; David Mathieu; Ajay Niranjan; John C Flickinger; John M Kirkwood; Ahmad Tarhini; Stergios Moschos; L Dade Lunsford Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2010-06-04 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Michael A Davies; Ping Liu; Susan McIntyre; Kevin B Kim; Nicholas Papadopoulos; Wen-Jen Hwu; Patrick Hwu; Agop Bedikian Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-10-19 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Wolfram E Samlowski; Gordon A Watson; Michael Wang; Ganesh Rao; Paul Klimo; Kenneth Boucher; Dennis C Shrieve; Randy L Jensen Journal: Cancer Date: 2007-05-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Jedd D Wolchok; Axel Hoos; Steven O'Day; Jeffrey S Weber; Omid Hamid; Celeste Lebbé; Michele Maio; Michael Binder; Oliver Bohnsack; Geoffrey Nichol; Rachel Humphrey; F Stephen Hodi Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-11-24 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: K M Fife; M H Colman; G N Stevens; I C Firth; D Moon; K F Shannon; R Harman; K Petersen-Schaefer; A C Zacest; M Besser; G W Milton; W H McCarthy; J F Thompson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-04-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Maya Mathew; Moses Tam; Patrick A Ott; Anna C Pavlick; Stephen C Rush; Bernadine R Donahue; John G Golfinos; Erik C Parker; Paul P Huang; Ashwatha Narayana Journal: Melanoma Res Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Davide Franceschini; Ciro Franzese; Fiorenza De Rose; Pierina Navarria; Giuseppe R D'Agostino; Tiziana Comito; Angelo Tozzi; Maria C Tronconi; Lorenza Di Guardo; Michele Del Vecchio; Marta Scorsetti Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2017-07-14 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Paul W Sperduto; Wen Jiang; Paul D Brown; Steve Braunstein; Penny Sneed; Daniel A Wattson; Helen A Shih; Ananta Bangdiwala; Ryan Shanley; Natalie A Lockney; Kathryn Beal; Emil Lou; Thomas Amatruda; William A Sperduto; John P Kirkpatrick; Norman Yeh; Laurie E Gaspar; Jason K Molitoris; Laura Masucci; David Roberge; James Yu; Veronica Chiang; Minesh Mehta Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2017-03-29 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Christina S Baik; Eric H Rubin; Patrick M Forde; Janice M Mehnert; Deborah Collyar; Marcus O Butler; Erica L Dixon; Laura Q M Chow Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: E Liniker; A M Menzies; B Y Kong; A Cooper; S Ramanujam; S Lo; R F Kefford; G B Fogarty; A Guminski; T W Wang; M S Carlino; A Hong; G V Long Journal: Oncoimmunology Date: 2016-08-19 Impact factor: 8.110
Authors: Tyler P Robin; Robert E Breeze; Derek E Smith; Chad G Rusthoven; Karl D Lewis; Rene Gonzalez; Amanda Brill; Robin Saiki; Kelly Stuhr; Laurie E Gaspar; Sana D Karam; David Raben; Brian D Kavanagh; Sameer K Nath; Arthur K Liu Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2018-06-16 Impact factor: 4.130