Literature DB >> 25754273

The combined serum levels of miR-375 and urokinase plasminogen activator receptor are suggested as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in prostate cancer.

Sven Wach1, Omar Al-Janabi1, Katrin Weigelt1, Kersten Fischer2, Thomas Greither3, Marios Marcou2,3, Gerit Theil2, Elke Nolte1, Hans-Juergen Holzhausen4, Robert Stöhr5, Verena Huppert1, Arndt Hartmann5, Paolo Fornara2, Bernd Wullich1, Helge Taubert1.   

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the applicability of miR-375 in combination with the soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) protein as a diagnostic and/or prognostic biomarker for prostate cancer (PCa) patients. miR-375 levels by qRT-PCR and suPAR levels by ELISA were evaluated in serum samples from 146 PCa patients, 35 benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) patients and 18 healthy controls. Antigen levels of suPAR differed between healthy controls and PCa or BPH patients, whereas miR-375 levels differed between PCa and BPH patients or healthy controls (p < 0.001). Additionally, suPAR levels differed between the Gleason sum groups GS = 7 versus GS > 7, with higher levels in the latter group (p = 0.011), and miR-375 levels were higher in the tumor stage group T3-T4 compared with the T1-T2 group (p = 0.039). A high concentration of suPAR was associated with a poor disease-specific survival (DSS; p = 0.039). The combination of suPAR and miR-375 levels identified a patient group possessing high levels for both parameters. This was associated with a poorer 10-year overall survival (OS) and DSS, with a 6.38-fold increased risk of death and a 7.68-fold increased risk of tumor-related death (p = 0.00026 and p = 0.014; univariate Cox's regression analysis). In a multivariate Cox's regression analysis PCa patients with high levels of suPAR and miR-375 showed a 5.72-fold increased risk of death in OS (p = 0.006). In summary, the differences between the PCa/BPH/healthy control cohorts for either suPAR and miR-375 levels in conjunction with the association of combined high suPAR/miR-375 levels with a poor prognosis suggest a diagnostic and prognostic impact for PCa patients.
© 2015 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diagnosis; disease-specific survival; miR-375; overall survival; prostate cancer; urokinase plasminogen activator receptor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25754273     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  19 in total

1.  Digital-resolution detection of microRNA with single-base selectivity by photonic resonator absorption microscopy.

Authors:  Taylor D Canady; Nantao Li; Lucas D Smith; Yi Lu; Manish Kohli; Andrew M Smith; Brian T Cunningham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The translational potential of microRNAs as biofluid markers of urological tumours.

Authors:  Annika Fendler; Carsten Stephan; George M Yousef; Glen Kristiansen; Klaus Jung
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  MicroRNAs in extracellular vesicles: potential cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  Takashi Kinoshita; Kenneth W Yip; Tara Spence; Fei-Fei Liu
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.172

4.  miR-375 induces docetaxel resistance in prostate cancer by targeting SEC23A and YAP1.

Authors:  Yuan Wang; Rachel Lieberman; Jing Pan; Qi Zhang; Meijun Du; Peng Zhang; Marja Nevalainen; Manish Kohli; Niraj K Shenoy; Hui Meng; Ming You; Liang Wang
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 27.401

5.  SCUBE1: a promising biomarker in renal cell cancer.

Authors:  Ersagun Karagüzel; Ahmet Menteşe; İlke O Kazaz; Selim Demir; Asım Örem; Ali Ertan Okatan; Diler Us Altay; Serap Özer Yaman
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 6.  Potential Role of MicroRNA-375 as Biomarker in Human Cancers Detection: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jin Yan; Qiang She; Xiaoran Shen; Yifeng Zhang; Bingtuan Liu; Guoxin Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  The potential of microRNAs as human prostate cancer biomarkers: A meta-analysis of related studies.

Authors:  Chun-Jiao Song; Huan Chen; Li-Zhong Chen; Guo-Mei Ru; Jian-Jun Guo; Qian-Nan Ding
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.429

8.  Circulating mRNAs and miRNAs as candidate markers for the diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Marilesia Ferreira de Souza; Hellen Kuasne; Mateus de Camargo Barros-Filho; Heloísa Lizotti Cilião; Fabio Albuquerque Marchi; Paulo Emilio Fuganti; Alexandre Rossi Paschoal; Silvia Regina Rogatto; Ilce Mara de Syllos Cólus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Expression of GP88 (progranulin) in serum of prostate cancer patients is associated with Gleason scores and overall survival.

Authors:  Thomas Greither; Kersten Fischer; Gerit Theil; Marios Marcou; Hans-Juergen Holzhausen; Katrin Weigelt; Ginette Serrero; David Hicks; Binbin Yue; Paolo Fornara; Bernd Wullich; Helge Taubert; Sven Wach; Verena Lieb
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 3.989

10.  Exploring the MIR143-UPAR Axis for the Inhibition of Human Prostate Cancer Cells In Vitro and In Vivo.

Authors:  Sven Wach; Madeleine Brandl; Hannes Borchardt; Katrin Weigelt; Sabine Lukat; Elke Nolte; Omar Al-Janabi; Martin Hart; Friedrich Grässer; Johannes Giedl; Rudolf Jung; Robert Stöhr; Arndt Hartmann; Verena Lieb; Sabrina Höbel; Anna Peters; Claudia Stäubert; Bernd Wullich; Helge Taubert; Achim Aigner
Journal:  Mol Ther Nucleic Acids       Date:  2019-02-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.