Matthew Packard1, Olivier Gayou2, Krishna Gurram3, Brandon Weiss2, Shyam Thakkar3, Alexander Kirichenko2. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Lemmen-Holton Cancer Pavilion, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. 3. Center for Digestive Health, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Visualisation of soft tissues such as pancreatic tumours by mega-voltage cone beam CT (MV-CBCT) is frequently difficult and daily localisation is often based on more easily seen adjacent bony anatomy. Fiducial markers implanted into pancreatic tumours serve as surrogates for tumour position and may more accurately represent absolute tumour position. Differences in daily shifts based on alignment to implanted fiducial markers vs. alignment to adjacent bony anatomy were compared. METHODS: Gold fiducial markers were placed into the pancreatic tumour under endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance in 12 patients. Patients subsequently received image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IG-IMRT). MV-CBCT was performed prior to each fraction and isocentre shifts were performed based on alignment to the fiducial markers. We retrospectively reviewed archived MV-CBCT datasets and calculated shift differences in the left-right (LR), superior-inferior (SI) and anterior-posterior (AP) axes relative to shifts based on alignment to adjacent bony anatomy. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-three fractions were analysed. The mean absolute difference in isocentre shifts between the fiducial markers and those aligned to bony anatomy was 3.4 mm (range 0-13 mm), 6.3 mm (range 0-21 mm) and 2.6 mm (range 0-12 mm), in LR, SI and AP directions, respectively. The mean three-dimensional vector shift difference between markers vs. bony anatomy alignment was 8.6 mm. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that fiducial markers used in conjunction with MV-CBCT improve the accuracy of daily target delineation compared with localisation using adjacent bony anatomy and that gold fiducial markers using MV-CBCT alignment are a viable option for target localisation during IG-IMRT.
INTRODUCTION: Visualisation of soft tissues such as pancreatic tumours by mega-voltage cone beam CT (MV-CBCT) is frequently difficult and daily localisation is often based on more easily seen adjacent bony anatomy. Fiducial markers implanted into pancreatic tumours serve as surrogates for tumour position and may more accurately represent absolute tumour position. Differences in daily shifts based on alignment to implanted fiducial markers vs. alignment to adjacent bony anatomy were compared. METHODS: Gold fiducial markers were placed into the pancreatic tumour under endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance in 12 patients. Patients subsequently received image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IG-IMRT). MV-CBCT was performed prior to each fraction and isocentre shifts were performed based on alignment to the fiducial markers. We retrospectively reviewed archived MV-CBCT datasets and calculated shift differences in the left-right (LR), superior-inferior (SI) and anterior-posterior (AP) axes relative to shifts based on alignment to adjacent bony anatomy. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-three fractions were analysed. The mean absolute difference in isocentre shifts between the fiducial markers and those aligned to bony anatomy was 3.4 mm (range 0-13 mm), 6.3 mm (range 0-21 mm) and 2.6 mm (range 0-12 mm), in LR, SI and AP directions, respectively. The mean three-dimensional vector shift difference between markers vs. bony anatomy alignment was 8.6 mm. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that fiducial markers used in conjunction with MV-CBCT improve the accuracy of daily target delineation compared with localisation using adjacent bony anatomy and that gold fiducial markers using MV-CBCT alignment are a viable option for target localisation during IG-IMRT.
Authors: Susana Marques; Miguel Bispo; Sílvia Leite; Teresa Moreira; Ana Caldeira; Pedro Moutinho-Ribeiro; Nuno Nunes Journal: GE Port J Gastroenterol Date: 2020-07-28
Authors: Silvia Carrara; Mihai Rimbas; Alberto Larghi; Milena Di Leo; Tiziana Comito; Joseph Abi Jaoude; Cullen M Taniguchi; Christoph F Dietrich; Manoop S Bhutani; Stephan Hollerbach Journal: Endosc Ultrasound Date: 2021 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.628