Literature DB >> 25754001

The communication of forensic science in the criminal justice system: A review of theory and proposed directions for research.

Loene M Howes1.   

Abstract

Clear communication about forensic science is essential to the effectiveness and perceived trustworthiness of the criminal justice system. Communication can be seen as a meaning-making process that involves different components such as the sender of a message, the message itself, the channel in which a message is sent, and the receiver of the message. Research conducted to date on the communication between forensic scientists and non-scientists in the criminal justice system has focused on different components of the communication process as objects of study. The purpose of this paper is to bring together communication theory and past research on the communication of forensic science to contribute to a deeper understanding of it, and to provide a coherent view of it overall. The paper first outlines the broader context of communication theory and science communication as a backdrop to forensic science communication. Then it presents a conceptual framework as a way to organise past research and, using the framework, reviews recent examples of empirical research and commentary on the communication of forensic science. Finally the paper identifies aspects of the communication of forensic science that may be addressed by future research to enhance the effectiveness of communication between scientists and non-scientists in this multidisciplinary arena.
Copyright © 2014 Forensic Science Society. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Communication; Deficit model; Expert opinion; Forensic science; Literature review; Science communication

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25754001     DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2014.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Justice        ISSN: 1355-0306            Impact factor:   2.124


  3 in total

1.  (Mis)use of scientific measurements in forensic science.

Authors:  Itiel E Dror; Nicholas Scurich
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2020-09-06       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Increasing the accessibility and impact of justice-related student and practitioner research.

Authors:  Rachel S Bolton-King; Helen Kara; John P Cassella; Brian W J Rankin; Ruth M Morgan; Siobhan Burke; Dom Fripp; John P Kaye
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Must the random man be unrelated? A lingering misconception in forensic genetics.

Authors:  Emmanuel Milot; Simon Baechler; Frank Crispino
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 2.395

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.