Literature DB >> 25753972

Increasing protein charge state when using laser electrospray mass spectrometry.

Santosh Karki1, Paul M Flanigan, Johnny J Perez, Jieutonne J Archer, Robert J Levis.   

Abstract

Femtosecond (fs) laser vaporization is used to transfer cytochrome c, myoglobin, lysozyme, and ubiquitin from the condensed phase into an electrospray (ES) plume consisting of a mixture of a supercharging reagent, m-nitrobenzyl alcohol (m-NBA), and trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), acetic acid (AA), or formic acid (FA). Interaction of acid-sensitive proteins like cytochrome c and myoglobin with the highly charged ES droplets resulted in a shift to higher charge states in comparison with acid-stable proteins like lysozyme and ubiquitin. Laser electrospray mass spectrometry (LEMS) measurements showed an increase in both the average charge states (Zavg) and the charge state with maximum intensity (Zmode) for acid-sensitive proteins compared with conventional electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) under equivalent solvent conditions. A marked increase in ion abundance of higher charge states was observed for LEMS in comparison with conventional electrospray for cytochrome c (ranging from 19+ to 21+ versus 13+ to 16+) and myoglobin (ranging from 19+ to 26+ versus 18+ to 21+) using an ES solution containing m-NBA and TFA. LEMS measurements as a function of electrospray flow rate yielded increasing charge states with decreasing flow rates for cytochrome c and myoglobin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25753972     DOI: 10.1007/s13361-015-1084-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 1044-0305            Impact factor:   3.109


  52 in total

1.  Effects of solvent on the maximum charge state and charge state distribution of protein ions produced by electrospray ionization.

Authors:  A T Iavarone; J C Jurchen; E R Williams
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Effect of different solution flow rates on analyte ion signals in nano-ESI MS, or: when does ESI turn into nano-ESI?

Authors:  Andrea Schmidt; Michael Karas; Thomas Dülcks
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  High-throughput automated post-processing of separation data.

Authors:  Jonathan G Shackman; Christopher J Watson; Robert T Kennedy
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2004-06-25       Impact factor: 4.759

4.  Laser electrospray mass spectrometry minimizes ion suppression facilitating quantitative mass spectral response for multicomponent mixtures of proteins.

Authors:  Johnny J Perez; Paul M Flanigan; Santosh Karki; Robert J Levis
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Ion formation from charged droplets: Roles of geometry, energy, and time.

Authors:  J B Fenn
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.109

6.  Nonresonant femtosecond laser vaporization with electrospray postionization for ex vivo plant tissue typing using compressive linear classification.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Judge; John J Brady; Paolo Emilio Barbano; Robert J Levis
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Determination of inorganic improvised explosive device signatures using laser electrospray mass spectrometry detection with offline classification.

Authors:  Paul M Flanigan; John J Brady; Elizabeth J Judge; Robert J Levis
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Conformations and folding of lysozyme ions in vacuo.

Authors:  D S Gross; P D Schnier; S E Rodriguez-Cruz; C K Fagerquist; E R Williams
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Ambient femtosecond laser vaporization and nanosecond laser desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Paul Flanigan; Robert Levis
Journal:  Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif)       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 10.745

10.  Infrared laser-assisted desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Yohannes H Rezenom; Jianan Dong; Kermit K Murray
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 4.616

View more
  6 in total

1.  Assessment of Reproducibility of Laser Electrospray Mass Spectrometry using Electrospray Deposition of Analyte.

Authors:  Habiballah Sistani; Santosh Karki; Jieutonne J Archer; Fengjian Shi; Robert J Levis
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Isolating Protein Charge State Reduction in Electrospray Droplets Using Femtosecond Laser Vaporization.

Authors:  Santosh Karki; Habiballah Sistani; Jieutonne J Archer; Fengjian Shi; Robert J Levis
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Quantification of Protein-Ligand Interactions by Laser Electrospray Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Jieutonne J Archer; Santosh Karki; Fengjian Shi; Habiballah Sistani; Robert J Levis
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  Direct Analysis of Proteins from Solutions with High Salt Concentration Using Laser Electrospray Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Santosh Karki; Fengjian Shi; Jieutonne J Archer; Habiballah Sistani; Robert J Levis
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 3.109

5.  Internal Energy Deposition in Infrared Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Electrospray Ionization With and Without the Use of Ice as a Matrix.

Authors:  Anqi Tu; David C Muddiman
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 6.  Current perspectives on supercharging reagents in electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Daniel A Abaye; Irene A Agbo; Birthe V Nielsen
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 3.361

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.