| Literature DB >> 25753943 |
Hsiang-Hsi Hong1,2, Tzung-Hai Yen3, Adrienne Hong4, Ting-An Chou1,2.
Abstract
Designed sockets prepared on the mandibles of nine Beagle dogs were divided into three groups: Calcitriol +Alloplast, Alloplast and Empty. Five of the nine dogs received Vit.D3 and calcium supplement (Vit.D/Ca group), while the other four dogs without supplements were assigned to Non-Vit.D/Ca group. After 4 weeks, the extent of vertical ridge resorption (VRR), bone density (density), new bone formation (NBF) and implant stability quotient (ISQ) were measured. Following systemic Vit.D/Ca administration, the Empty subgroup showed significant differences from the Calcitriol + Alloplast subgroup on variants NBF/Density/VRR and the Alloplast subgroup on items NBF/Density/ISQ/VRR. Alternatively, the Calcitriol + Alloplast subgroup revealed higher values of NBF/Density/ISQ (P < 0.001) and a lower VRR value (P = 0.001) than the Alloplast subgroup. Although there were no significant differences in NBF (P = 0.349), density (P = 0.796), ISQ (P = 0.577) and VRR (0.979) comparisons on alloplast treatment between the Vit.D/Ca and Non-Vit.D/Ca groups, local application with Calcitriol + Alloplast demonstrated better NBF/Density/ISQ (P = 0.02 to <0.001) effects than which of Alloplast subgroups. Consequently, the results showed that both systemic and local vitamin D3 treatment might accelerate bone regeneration in dogs. Within the using dose, systemic vitamin D3 treatment displayed a superior stimulating effect than local vitamin D3 application did.Entities:
Keywords: alloplast; bone regeneration; calcitriol; cholecalciferol; ridge preservation; vitamin D3
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25753943 PMCID: PMC4459836 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.12460
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Mol Med ISSN: 1582-1838 Impact factor: 5.310
Figure 1Cylindrical-defect osteotomy and 4 weeks re-entry surgeries were applied for clinical and histological analysis. (A) Standardized sockets were prepared in both sides of the mandible. The socket defects were divided into three local treatment modalities. (B) The amount of vertical ridge resorption was evaluated according to a surgical stent. (C) The 3-mm-diameter and 6-mm-deep bone cores were drawn with a 4-mm-diameter trephine bur from the sites determined by a surgical stent. (D) A 4.8-mm-diameter with 6-mm-length implant was inserted and the ISQ was detected.
Results of taking systemic vitamin D3 or not on the tested variables of the alveolar bone regeneration in dogs
| Variables | Vit.D/Ca | Non-Vit.D/Ca | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calcitriol + Alloplast | Alloplast | Empty | Calcitriol + Alloplast | Alloplast | Empty | |
| NBF (%) | 35.24 ± 11.21 | 17.49 ± 5.04 | 48.19 ± 12.36 | 23.28 ± 9.28 | 13.13 ± 4.50 | 33.58 ± 6.40 |
| Density (Hu) | 1273.68 ± 236.56 | 598.28 ± 233.04 | 1518.18 ± 383.44 | 932.34 ± 229.20 | 565.53 ± 229.91 | 1155.96 ± 218.00 |
| ISQ (0–100) | 73.58 ± 5.51 | 64.60 ± 8.91 | 76.00 ± 4.80 | 74.31 ± 4.88 | 66.29 ± 7.02 | 73.67 ± 6.02 |
| VRR (mm) | 1.17 ± 0.24 | 1.46 ± 0.17 | 2.27 ± 0.27 | 1.42 ± 0.19 | 1.46 ± 0.13 | 2.72 ± 0.23 |
NBF, new bone formation; ISQ, implant stability quotient; VRR, vertical ridge resorption.
Generalized aspects and local expressions on the examined variants of the alveolar bone regeneration in dogs
| NBF (%) | Density (Hu) | ISQ | VRR (mm) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generalized aspects (Pooling the data of Calcitriol/alloplast, Alloplast, Empty groups) | ||||
| Vit.D/Ca | 33.68 ± 14.87 | 1156.92 ± 438.19 | 71.83 ± 7.64 | 1.50 ± 0.50 |
| Non-Vit.D/Ca | 22.96 ± 10.30 | 890.06 ± 300.76 | 72.24 ± 6.45 | 1.70 ± 0.56 |
| | 0.001 | 0.006 | 0.817 | 0.127 |
| Local expressions (Pooling the data of Vit.D/Ca and Non-Vit.D/Ca groups) | ||||
| Calcitriol + Alloplast | 29.92 ± 11.89 | 1121.97 ± 287.20 | 73.90 ± 5.18 | 1.28 ± 0.25 |
| Alloplast | 15.69 ± 5.17 | 584.79 ± 225.05 | 65.29 ± 7.99 | 1.45 ± 0.15 |
| Empty | 42.35 ± 12.52 | 1373.29 ± 367.05 | 75.06 ± 5.24 | 2.45 ± 0.34 |
| | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Significance differences among various subgroups were examined using trend estimation. Following systemic administration, the Vit.D/Ca group showed higher value of NBF (P = 0.001) and density (P = 0.006) than Non-Vit.D/Ca group.
ISQ, implant stability quotient; NBF, new bone formation; VRR, vertical ridge resorption.
P < 0.01
P < 0.001.
Figure 2The effects of vitamin D3 on alveolar bone regeneration in dogs were examined under microscopic observation (haematoxylin and eosin stain, original magnification ×10). (A) Empty defect in an individual receiving Vit.D/Ca supplement. (B) Empty defect in an individual without Vit.D/Ca supplement. (C) Calcitriol + alloplast defect in an individual receiving Vit.D/Ca supplement. (D) Calcitriol + alloplast defect in an individual without Vit.D/Ca supplement. (E) Alloplast defect in an individual receiving Vit.D/Ca supplement. (F) Alloplast defect in an individual without Vit.D/Ca supplement.
Comparison of the new bone formation (NBF) among various subgroups
| NBF | Vit.D/Ca | Non-Vit.D/Ca | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calcitriol + Alloplast | Alloplast | Empty | Calcitriol + Alloplast | Alloplast | Empty | |
| (%) | 35.24 ± 11.21 | 17.49 ± 5.04 | 48.19 ± 12.36 | 23.28 ± 9.28 | 13.13 ± 4.50 | 33.58 ± 6.40 |
| Vit.D/Ca | ||||||
| Calcitriol + Alloplast | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.706 | |
| Alloplast | <0.001 | 0.131 | 0.349 | 0.001 | ||
| Empty | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.004 | |||
| Non-Vit.D/Ca | ||||||
| Calcitriol + Alloplast | 0.020 | 0.025 | ||||
| Alloplast | <0.001 | |||||
| Empty | ||||||
Significant differences among most various groups were examined using anova and LSD tests.
NBF, new bone formation.
P < 0.001
P < 0.01
P < 0.05.
Relationship of the Density among various subgroups
| Density | Vit.D/Ca | Non-Vit.D/Ca | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calcitriol + Alloplast | Alloplast | Empty | Calcitriol + Alloplast | Alloplast | Empty | |
| (Hu) | 1273.68 ± 236.56 | 598.28 ± 233.04 | 1518.18 ± 383.44 | 932.34 ± 229.20 | 565.53 ± 229.91 | 1155.96 ± 218.00 |
| Vit.D/Ca | ||||||
| Calcitriol + Alloplast | <0.001 | 0.021 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.327 | |
| Alloplast | <0.001 | 0.002 | 0.796 | <0.001 | ||
| Empty | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.009 | |||
| Non-Vit.D/Ca | ||||||
| Calcitriol + Alloplast | 0.002 | 0.073 | ||||
| Alloplast | <0.001 | |||||
| Empty | ||||||
P < 0.05
P < 0.01
P < 0.001 by anova and LSD tests.
Evaluation of the implant stability quotient (ISQ) among various subgroups
| ISQ | With Vit.D/Ca | Non-Vit.D/Ca | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calcitriol + Alloplast | Alloplast | Empty | Calcitriol + Alloplast | Alloplast | Empty | |
| (0–100) | 73.58 ± 5.51 | 64.60 ± 8.91 | 76.00 ± 4.80 | 74.31 ± 4.88 | 66.29 ± 7.02 | 73.67 ± 6.02 |
| Vit.D/Ca | ||||||
| Calcitriol + Alloplast | <0.001 | 0.326 | 0.720 | 0.008 | 0.974 | |
| Alloplast | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.577 | 0.006 | ||
| Empty | 0.509 | 0.002 | 0.471 | |||
| Non-Vit.D/Ca | ||||||
| Calcitriol + Alloplast | 0.005 | 0.826 | ||||
| Alloplast | 0.034 | |||||
| Empty | ||||||
P < 0.05
P < 0.01
P < 0.001 by anova and LSD tests.
Variation in the vertical ridge resorption (VRR) among various subgroups
| VRR | With Vit.D/Ca | Non-Vit.D/Ca | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calcitriol + Alloplast | Alloplast | Empty | Calcitriol + Alloplast | Alloplast | Empty | |
| (mm) | 1.17 ± 0.24 | 1.46 ± 0.17 | 2.27 ± 0.27 | 1.42 ± 0.19 | 1.46 ± 0.13 | 2.72 ± 0.23 |
| Vit.D/Ca | ||||||
| Calcitriol + Alloplast | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.004 | <0.001 | |
| Alloplast | <0.001 | 0.636 | 0.979 | <0.001 | ||
| Empty | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
| Non-Vit.D/Ca | ||||||
| Calcitriol + Alloplast | 0.695 | <0.001 | ||||
| Alloplast | <0.001 | |||||
| Empty | ||||||
P < 0.01
P < 0.001 by anova and LSD tests.
Differentiation of the blood tests in dogs taking systemic Vit.D/Ca supplement to those receiving local Vit.D3 (Non-Vit.D/Ca) application
| Dog number | Before study (n = 9) | Sys Vit.D/Ca + Loc Vit.D3 (n = 5) | Loc Vit.D3 (n = 4) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tested items (normal range) | ||||
| 11.01 ± 0.105 | 11.02 ± 0.538 | 0.937 | ||
| 11.01 ± 0.105 | 11.28 ± 0.421 | 0.222 | ||
| 11.28 ± 0.421 | 11.02 ± 0.538 | 0.539 | ||
| Intact PTH (1–4 pg/ml) | 1.92 ± 1.109 | 2.53 ± 0.350 | 0.118 | |
| 1.92 ± 1.109 | 0.44 ± 0.984 | 0.018 | ||
| 0.44 ± 0.984 | 2.53 ± 0.350 | 0.019 | ||
| Serum Phos (2.1–6.3 mg/dl) | 5.43 ± 0.482 | 4.75 ± 0.695 | 0.139 | |
| 5.43 ± 0.482 | 4.7 ± 0.644 | 0.042 | ||
| 4.7 ± 0.644 | 4.75 ± 0.695 | 0.902 | ||
| 25-OH-D3 (25–200 nmol/l) | 31.67 ± 0.84 | 27.45 ± 0.412 | 0.005 | |
| 31.67 ± 0.84 | 28.68 ± 0.672 | 0.003 | ||
| 28.68 ± 0.672 | 27.45 ± 0.412 | 0.027 | ||
Sys Vit.D/Ca + Loc Vit.D3, Systemic Vit.D/Ca + Local Vit.D3 treatment; Loc Vit.D3, Local Vit.D3 application; Intact PTH, Intact parathyroid hormone; Serum Ca, Serum Calcium level; 25-OH-D3, Serum 25-OH-vitamin D3; Serum Phos, Serum Phosphorus level.
P < 0.05 by Mann–Whitney test.