Literature DB >> 25753773

Evaluating the effectiveness of knowledge brokering in health research: a systematised review with some bibliometric information.

Isioma N Elueze1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the effectiveness of knowledge brokering as a knowledge translation (KT) strategy used in promoting evidence-based decision-making, evidence-based practice or collaboration between researchers, health practitioners and policymakers.
METHODS: A systematised review of literature was performed using MEDLINE (through ProQuest Dialog), PubMed and Scopus electronic databases. A search strategy was developed to identify primary studies indexed in these databases on knowledge translation that reported the implementation of knowledge brokering. Sixty-two titles related to knowledge brokering were identified from the search after the removal of duplicates, and 24 articles met the eligibility criteria following the review of the full text documents. The findings were then synthesised using a narrative approach.
RESULTS: It was found that knowledge brokering has been an effective strategy for knowledge translation.
CONCLUSION: Although this review shows that knowledge brokering has been an effective strategy for KT, it advocates for more empirical studies to compare the effectiveness of specific knowledge brokering approaches with others. It also calls for empirical studies to explicate the role of library and information science professionals in knowledge brokering.
© 2015 Health Libraries Group.

Keywords:  bibliometrics; evaluation; evidence-based practice; health services research; knowledge translation; review; systematised

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25753773     DOI: 10.1111/hir.12097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Info Libr J        ISSN: 1471-1834


  6 in total

Review 1.  Bridging research and practice in conservation.

Authors:  Andrew N Kadykalo; Rachel T Buxton; Peter Morrison; Christine M Anderson; Holly Bickerton; Charles M Francis; Adam C Smith; Lenore Fahrig
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 7.563

2.  Transferring research from a university to the United Kingdom National Health Service: the implications for impact.

Authors:  Helen Payne
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2017-06-17

3.  Stakeholders' experiences of the public health research process: time to change the system?

Authors:  Yvonne Laird; Jillian Manner; Louise Baldwin; Ruth Hunter; John McAteer; Sarah Rodgers; Chloë Williamson; Ruth Jepson
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2020-07-18

4.  Bridging the academic and practice/policy gap in public health: perspectives from Scotland and Canada.

Authors:  J McAteer; E Di Ruggiero; A Fraser; J W Frank
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.341

Review 5.  Knowledge brokering for healthy aging: a scoping review of potential approaches.

Authors:  Dwayne Van Eerd; Kristine Newman; Ryan DeForge; Robin Urquhart; Evelyn Cornelissen; Katie N Dainty
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 7.327

6.  Promoting the use of self-management in novice chiropractors treating individuals with spine pain: the design of a theory-based knowledge translation intervention.

Authors:  Owis Eilayyan; Aliki Thomas; Marie-Christine Hallé; Sara Ahmed; Anthony C Tibbles; Craig Jacobs; Silvano Mior; Connie Davis; Roni Evans; Michael J Schneider; Fadi Alzoubi; Jan Barnsley; Cynthia R Long; Andre Bussières
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.