Literature DB >> 25753660

Malleable nature of mRNA-protein compositional complementarity and its functional significance.

Mario Hlevnjak1, Bojan Zagrovic2.   

Abstract

It has recently been demonstrated that nucleobase-density profiles of typical mRNA coding sequences exhibit a complementary relationship with nucleobase-interaction propensity profiles of their cognate protein sequences. This finding supports the idea that the genetic code developed in response to direct binding interactions between amino acids and appropriate nucleobases, but also suggests that present-day mRNAs and their cognate proteins may be physicochemically complementary to each other and bind. Here, we computationally recode complete Methanocaldococcus jannaschii, Escherichia coli and Homo sapiens mRNA transcriptomes and analyze how much complementary matching of synonymous mRNAs can vary, while keeping protein sequences fixed. We show that for most proteins there exist cognate mRNAs that improve, but also significantly worsen the level of native matching (e.g. by 1.8 viz. 7.6 standard deviations on average for H. sapiens, respectively), with the least malleable proteins in this sense being strongly enriched in nuclear localization and DNA-binding functions. Even so, we show that the majority of recodings for most proteins result in pronounced complementarity. Our results suggest that the genetic code was designed for favorable, yet tunable compositional complementarity between mRNAs and their cognate proteins, supporting the hypothesis that the interactions between the two were an important defining element behind the code's origin.
© The Author(s) 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25753660      PMCID: PMC4381073          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  34 in total

1.  The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource.

Authors:  M A Harris; J Clark; A Ireland; J Lomax; M Ashburner; R Foulger; K Eilbeck; S Lewis; B Marshall; C Mungall; J Richter; G M Rubin; J A Blake; C Bult; M Dolan; H Drabkin; J T Eppig; D P Hill; L Ni; M Ringwald; R Balakrishnan; J M Cherry; K R Christie; M C Costanzo; S S Dwight; S Engel; D G Fisk; J E Hirschman; E L Hong; R S Nash; A Sethuraman; C L Theesfeld; D Botstein; K Dolinski; B Feierbach; T Berardini; S Mundodi; S Y Rhee; R Apweiler; D Barrell; E Camon; E Dimmer; V Lee; R Chisholm; P Gaudet; W Kibbe; R Kishore; E M Schwarz; P Sternberg; M Gwinn; L Hannick; J Wortman; M Berriman; V Wood; N de la Cruz; P Tonellato; P Jaiswal; T Seigfried; R White
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  The complete genome sequence of Escherichia coli K-12.

Authors:  F R Blattner; G Plunkett; C A Bloch; N T Perna; V Burland; M Riley; J Collado-Vides; J D Glasner; C K Rode; G F Mayhew; J Gregor; N W Davis; H A Kirkpatrick; M A Goeden; D J Rose; B Mau; Y Shao
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-09-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Preventing α-synuclein aggregation: the role of the small heat-shock molecular chaperone proteins.

Authors:  Dezerae Cox; John A Carver; Heath Ecroyd
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2014-06-26

4.  Exonic transcription factor binding directs codon choice and affects protein evolution.

Authors:  Andrew B Stergachis; Eric Haugen; Anthony Shafer; Wenqing Fu; Benjamin Vernot; Alex Reynolds; Anthony Raubitschek; Steven Ziegler; Emily M LeProust; Joshua M Akey; John A Stamatoyannopoulos
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  DNA sequence evolution: the sounds of silence.

Authors:  P M Sharp; M Averof; A T Lloyd; G Matassi; J F Peden
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1995-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Synonymous but not the same: the causes and consequences of codon bias.

Authors:  Joshua B Plotkin; Grzegorz Kudla
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Identifying biological themes within lists of genes with EASE.

Authors:  Douglas A Hosack; Glynn Dennis; Brad T Sherman; H Clifford Lane; Richard A Lempicki
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2003-09-11       Impact factor: 13.583

8.  Coding-sequence determinants of gene expression in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Grzegorz Kudla; Andrew W Murray; David Tollervey; Joshua B Plotkin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Absolute binding-free energies between standard RNA/DNA nucleobases and amino-acid sidechain analogs in different environments.

Authors:  Anita de Ruiter; Bojan Zagrovic
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Landscape and variation of RNA secondary structure across the human transcriptome.

Authors:  Yue Wan; Kun Qu; Qiangfeng Cliff Zhang; Ryan A Flynn; Ohad Manor; Zhengqing Ouyang; Jiajing Zhang; Robert C Spitale; Michael P Snyder; Eran Segal; Howard Y Chang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  5 in total

1.  Compositional complementarity between genomic RNA and coat proteins in positive-sense single-stranded RNA viruses.

Authors:  Marlene Adlhart; Florian Poetsch; Mario Hlevnjak; Megan Hoogmoed; Anton A Polyansky; Bojan Zagrovic
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 19.160

2.  mRNA/protein sequence complementarity and its determinants: The impact of affinity scales.

Authors:  Lukas Bartonek; Bojan Zagrovic
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 3.  RNA-protein interactions in an unstructured context.

Authors:  Bojan Zagrovic; Lukas Bartonek; Anton A Polyansky
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 4.124

Review 4.  The progene hypothesis: the nucleoprotein world and how life began.

Authors:  Anatoly D Altstein
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.540

5.  Physicochemical Foundations of Life that Direct Evolution: Chance and Natural Selection are not Evolutionary Driving Forces.

Authors:  Didier Auboeuf
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.