Literature DB >> 25753598

Pulmonary blood volume measured by contrast enhanced ultrasound: a comparison with transpulmonary thermodilution.

I H F Herold1, M A Soliman Hamad2, H C van Assen3, R A Bouwman4, H H M Korsten5, M Mischi3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Blood volume quantification is essential for haemodynamic evaluation guiding fluid management in anaesthesia and intensive care practice. Ultrasound contrast agent (UCA)-dilution measured by contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can provide the UCA mean transit time (MTT) between the right and left heart, enabling the assessment of the intrathoracic blood volume (ITBV(UCA)). The purpose of the present study was to investigate the agreement between UCA-dilution using CEUS and transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) in vitro and in vivo.
METHODS: In an in vitro setup, with variable flows and volumes, we injected a double indicator, ice-cold saline with SonoVue(®), and performed volume measurements using transesophageal echo and thermodilution by PiCCO(®). In a pilot study, we assigned 17 patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery for pulmonary blood volume (PBV) measurement using TPTD by PiCCO(®) and ITBV by UCA-dilution. Correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman analysis were performed for all volume measurements.
RESULTS: In vitro, 73 experimental MTT's were obtained using PiCCO(®) and UCA-dilution. The volumes by PiCCO(®) and UCA-dilution correlated with true volumes; r(s)=0.96 (95% CI, 0.93-0.97; P<0.0001) and r(s)=0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-0.98; P<0.0001), respectively. The bias of PBV by PiCCO(®) and ITBV(UCA) were -380 ml and -42 ml, respectively. In 16 patients, 86 measurements were performed. The correlation between PBV by PiCCO(®) and ITBV(UCA) was r(s)=0.69 (95% CI 0.55-0.79; P<0.0001). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a bias of -323 ml.
CONCLUSIONS: ITBV assessment with CEUS seems a promising technique for blood volume measurement, which is minimally-invasive and bedside applicable. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN90330260.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood volume determination; contrast echocardiography; indicator dilution techniques; thermodilution

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25753598     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeu554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  5 in total

1.  Effect of Temperature on the Size Distribution, Shell Properties, and Stability of Definity®.

Authors:  Himanshu Shekhar; Nathaniel J Smith; Jason L Raymond; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  The relationship between pulmonary artery wedge pressure and pulmonary blood volume derived from contrast echocardiography: A proof-of-concept study.

Authors:  Ken Monahan; Daniel Lenihan; Evan L Brittain; Linda Saliba; Robert N Piana; Leslie L Robison; Melissa M Hudson; Gregory T Armstrong
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 1.724

3.  Reliability, repeatability, and reproducibility of pulmonary transit time assessment by contrast enhanced echocardiography.

Authors:  Ingeborg H F Herold; Salvatore Saporito; R Arthur Bouwman; Patrick Houthuizen; Hans C van Assen; Massimo Mischi; Hendrikus H M Korsten
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 2.062

4.  Pulmonary transit time measurement by contrast-enhanced ultrasound in left ventricular dyssynchrony.

Authors:  Ingeborg H F Herold; Salvatore Saporito; Massimo Mischi; Hans C van Assen; R Arthur Bouwman; Anouk G W de Lepper; Harrie C M van den Bosch; Hendrikus H M Korsten; Patrick Houthuizen
Journal:  Echo Res Pract       Date:  2016-05-16

5.  Stress pulmonary circulation parameters assessed by a cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients after a heart transplant.

Authors:  Lukáš Opatřil; Roman Panovsky; Mary Mojica-Pisciotti; Jan Máchal; Jan Krejčí; Tomáš Holeček; Lucia Masárová; Věra Feitová; Július Godava; Vladimír Kincl; Tomáš Kepák; Gabriela Závodná; Lenka Špinarová
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.