Literature DB >> 25753494

Bedside prediction of the progress of pressure ulcer healing in patients with spinal cord injury using the 'Decu-stick'.

F W A Van Asbeck1, M W M Post2.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This is a prospective cohort study.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to predict the progress of healing of pressure ulcers (PUs) in spinal cord injury (SCI) patients after the first 4 weeks.
SETTING: The study was conducted in a specialized SCI rehabilitation unit in The Netherlands.
METHODS: Weekly measurements of length, width and depth/undermining of grades II-IV PUs under sacrum or ischial tuberosity in SCI patients with the 'Decu-stick' were taken. The speed of reduction of the greatest dimension in the first 4 weeks of the granulation-epithelization (G-E) phase was compared with the speed of reduction of this dimension after week 4 until the end of observation.
RESULTS: Fifty-one PUs in 45 patients were measured. During the first 4 weeks of the G-E phase, the greatest dimension of 23/51 PUs reduced with a speed of ⩾0.5 cm per week. In 22 of these 23 PUs, this speed remained ⩾0.5 from week 4 until the end of observation (weeks 5-22). Closure: 21 patients (pts); operation: 2 pts. Of 28/51 PUs, this dimension reduced with <0.5 cm per week. In 27/28 PUs, this speed remained <0.5 from week 4 until the end of observation (weeks 9-37). Closure: 6 pts; operation: 16 pts; discharge with open ulcer: 6 pts.
CONCLUSION: Measurement of PUs in SCI patients with the 'Decu-stick' provides a reliable, quick, cheap and easy-to-learn bedside method to predict the progress of healing in PUs in SCI patients after 4 weeks of conservative treatment with a positive predictive value of 0.95 and an negative predictive value of 0.96. This provides a scientific basis for the decision on operative or alternative conservative treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25753494     DOI: 10.1038/sc.2015.40

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  16 in total

Review 1.  What is the best method for assessing the rate of wound healing? A comparison of 3 mathematical formulas.

Authors:  Rebecca L Jessup
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.347

Review 2.  Monitoring healing of pressure ulcers: a review of assessment instruments for use in the spinal cord unit.

Authors:  M S van Lis; F W A van Asbeck; M W M Post
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Bates-Jensen wound assessment tool: pictorial guide validation project.

Authors:  Connie Harris; Barbara Bates-Jensen; Nancy Parslow; Rose Raizman; Mina Singh; Robert Ketchen
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.741

4.  A new way to size up a wound.

Authors:  J I Kundin
Journal:  Am J Nurs       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 2.220

5.  The Pressure Sore Status Tool a few thousand assessments later.

Authors:  B M Bates-Jensen
Journal:  Adv Wound Care       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Development of the DESIGN-R with an observational study: an absolute evaluation tool for monitoring pressure ulcer wound healing.

Authors:  Yuko Matsui; Masutaka Furue; Hiromi Sanada; Takao Tachibana; Takeo Nakayama; Junko Sugama; Katsunori Furuta; Masahiro Tachi; Keiko Tokunaga; Yoshiki Miyachi
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 3.617

7.  Prevalence of pressure sores in a community sample of spinal injury patients.

Authors:  P Raghavan; W A Raza; Y S Ahmed; M A Chamberlain
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.477

Review 8.  A clinically relevant wound assessment method to monitor healing progression.

Authors:  Sharon Barber
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.629

9.  The Sessing Scale for measurement of pressure ulcer healing.

Authors:  B A Ferrell
Journal:  Adv Wound Care       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 10.  A systematic review of the performance of instruments designed to measure the dimensions of pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Susan M O'Meara; J Martin Bland; Jo C Dumville; Nicky A Cullum
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.617

View more
  1 in total

1.  The reliability of measuring wound undermining in people with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  F W A van Asbeck
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.772

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.