Literature DB >> 25753111

The impact of robotics on the mode of benign hysterectomy and clinical outcomes.

Anthony A Luciano1, Danielle E Luciano1, Jessica Gabbert2, Usha Seshadri-Kreaden3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The impact of robotics on benign hysterectomy surgical approach, clinical outcomes, and learning curve is still unclear.
METHODS: Review of abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic, or robotic cases in 156 US hospitals in the Premier Research Database.
RESULTS: Of 289 875 hysterectomies, abdominal cases decreased from 2005-2010 (60-33%) and minimally invasive approaches increased (40-67%). Conversion rates were: 0.04% for vaginal, 2.5% for robotic, and 7.2% for laparoscopy (P < 0.001). Robotic surgery time was longest (3.4 h vs. 2.2 vaginal, 2.5 abdominal, 2.7 laparoscopy, P < 0.001). Robotic complication rate was lowest (14.8% vs. 16.2% vaginal, 18.6% laparoscopy, 28.9% abdominal, P < 0.001). Hospital stay was longer following abdominal surgery (3.5 days vs. 1.8 robotic, 1.9 vaginal, 1.8 laparoscopy, P < 0.001). Robotic surgery times and conversion and complication rates improved with experience (2.8 h, 2%, and 13.9%, respectively), even with increasing complexity.
CONCLUSIONS: Robotics was successfully incorporated without jeopardizing patient outcomes and increased the overall use of minimally invasive approaches.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abdominal; da Vinci surgical system; laparoscopy; learning curve; robotic-assisted hysterectomy; vaginal

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25753111     DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Robot        ISSN: 1478-5951            Impact factor:   2.547


  5 in total

1.  Robots Under COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comprehensive Survey.

Authors:  Yang Shen; Dejun Guo; Fei Long; Luis A Mateos; Houzhu Ding; Zhen Xiu; Randall B Hellman; Adam King; Shixun Chen; Chengkun Zhang; Huan Tan
Journal:  IEEE Access       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 3.367

2.  Impact of type of minimally invasive approach on open conversions across ten common procedures in different specialties.

Authors:  Paresh C Shah; Alexander de Groot; Robert Cerfolio; William C Huang; Kathy Huang; Chao Song; Yanli Li; Usha Kreaden; Daniel S Oh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 3.  Systematic review of learning curves in robot-assisted surgery.

Authors:  N A Soomro; D A Hashimoto; A J Porteous; C J A Ridley; W J Marsh; R Ditto; S Roy
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2019-11-29

4.  Complication reports for robotic surgery using three arms by a single surgeon at a single institution.

Authors:  Ching-Hui Chen; Huang-Hui Chen; Wei-Min Liu
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.407

5.  Robotic surgery during the COVID pandemic: why now and why for the future.

Authors:  Gaby N Moawad; Sara Rahman; Martin A Martino; Jordan S Klebanoff
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2020-07-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.