Literature DB >> 25752604

Variable Substrate Preference among Phospholipase D Toxins from Sicariid Spiders.

Daniel M Lajoie1, Sue A Roberts1, Pamela A Zobel-Thropp2, Jared L Delahaye2, Vahe Bandarian1, Greta J Binford2, Matthew H J Cordes3.   

Abstract

Venoms of the sicariid spiders contain phospholipase D enzyme toxins that can cause severe dermonecrosis and even death in humans. These enzymes convert sphingolipid and lysolipid substrates to cyclic phosphates by activating a hydroxyl nucleophile present in both classes of lipid. The most medically relevant substrates are thought to be sphingomyelin and/or lysophosphatidylcholine. To better understand the substrate preference of these toxins, we used (31)P NMR to compare the activity of three related but phylogenetically diverse sicariid toxins against a diverse panel of sphingolipid and lysolipid substrates. Two of the three showed significantly faster turnover of sphingolipids over lysolipids, and all three showed a strong preference for positively charged (choline and/or ethanolamine) over neutral (glycerol and serine) headgroups. Strikingly, however, the enzymes vary widely in their preference for choline, the headgroup of both sphingomyelin and lysophosphatidylcholine, versus ethanolamine. An enzyme from Sicarius terrosus showed a strong preference for ethanolamine over choline, whereas two paralogous enzymes from Loxosceles arizonica either preferred choline or showed no significant preference. Intrigued by the novel substrate preference of the Sicarius enzyme, we solved its crystal structure at 2.1 Å resolution. The evolution of variable substrate specificity may help explain the reduced dermonecrotic potential of some natural toxin variants, because mammalian sphingolipids use primarily choline as a positively charged headgroup; it may also be relevant for sicariid predatory behavior, because ethanolamine-containing sphingolipids are common in insect prey.
© 2015 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Crystal Structure; Enzyme Mechanism; Loxosceles; Loxoscelism; Phospholipase D; Sicarius; Sphingomyelinase; Substrate Specificity; Toxin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25752604      PMCID: PMC4409260          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M115.636951

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  79 in total

1.  A molecular viewer for the analysis of TLS rigid-body motion in macromolecules.

Authors:  Jay Painter; Ethan A Merritt
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2005-03-24

2.  Lateral gene transfer of a dermonecrotic toxin between spiders and bacteria.

Authors:  Matthew H J Cordes; Greta J Binford
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Detection of TLS/FUS-CHOP fusion transcripts in a case of oral liposarcoma.

Authors:  Elena Riet Correa Rivero; Ricardo Alves Mesquita; Suzana Cantanhede Orsini Machado de Sousa; Fabio Daumas Nunes
Journal:  Ann Diagn Pathol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.090

4.  Brown spider dermonecrotic toxin directly induces nephrotoxicity.

Authors:  Olga Meiri Chaim; Youssef Bacila Sade; Rafael Bertoni da Silveira; Leny Toma; Evanguedes Kalapothakis; Carlos Chávez-Olórtegui; Oldemir Carlos Mangili; Waldemiro Gremski; Carl Peter von Dietrich; Helena B Nader; Silvio Sanches Veiga
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 4.219

5.  Structural basis for metal ion coordination and the catalytic mechanism of sphingomyelinases D.

Authors:  Mário T Murakami; Matheus F Fernandes-Pedrosa; Denise V Tambourgi; Raghuvir K Arni
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-01-14       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Brown recluse spider (Loxosceles reclusa) venom phospholipase D (PLD) generates lysophosphatidic acid (LPA).

Authors:  Sangderk Lee; Kevin R Lynch
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 3.857

7.  Cloning, expression and characterization of a phospholipase D from Loxosceles gaucho venom gland.

Authors:  Geraldo S Magalhães; Maria C Caporrino; Maisa S Della-Casa; Louise F Kimura; José P Prezotto-Neto; Daniel A Fukuda; José A Portes-Junior; Ana G C Neves-Ferreira; Marcelo L Santoro; Katia C Barbaro
Journal:  Biochimie       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 4.079

8.  Brown spider phospholipase-D containing a conservative mutation (D233E) in the catalytic site: identification and functional characterization.

Authors:  Larissa Vuitika; Luiza Helena Gremski; Matheus Regis Belisário-Ferrari; Daniele Chaves-Moreira; Valéria Pereira Ferrer; Andrea Senff-Ribeiro; Olga Meiri Chaim; Silvio Sanches Veiga
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.429

9.  Phospholipase D toxins of brown spider venom convert lysophosphatidylcholine and sphingomyelin to cyclic phosphates.

Authors:  Daniel M Lajoie; Pamela A Zobel-Thropp; Vlad K Kumirov; Vahe Bandarian; Greta J Binford; Matthew H J Cordes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Venom of the Brazilian spider Sicarius ornatus (Araneae, Sicariidae) contains active sphingomyelinase D: potential for toxicity after envenomation.

Authors:  Priscila Hess Lopes; Rogério Bertani; Rute M Gonçalves-de-Andrade; Roberto H Nagahama; Carmen W van den Berg; Denise V Tambourgi
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2013-08-22
View more
  11 in total

1.  Adaptive evolution in the toxicity of a spider's venom enzymes.

Authors:  Aurélio Pedroso; Sergio Russo Matioli; Mario Tyago Murakami; Giselle Pidde-Queiroz; Denise V Tambourgi
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.260

Review 2.  Highlights in the knowledge of brown spider toxins.

Authors:  Daniele Chaves-Moreira; Andrea Senff-Ribeiro; Ana Carolina Martins Wille; Luiza Helena Gremski; Olga Meiri Chaim; Silvio Sanches Veiga
Journal:  J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis       Date:  2017-02-08

3.  Toxin Fused with SUMO Tag: A New Expression Vector Strategy to Obtain Recombinant Venom Toxins with Easy Tag Removal inside the Bacteria.

Authors:  Lhiri H A L Shimokawa-Falcão; Maria C Caporrino; Katia C Barbaro; Maisa S Della-Casa; Geraldo S Magalhães
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 4.546

4.  Evolutionary dynamics of origin and loss in the deep history of phospholipase D toxin genes.

Authors:  Matthew H J Cordes; Greta J Binford
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  Loxoscelism: Advances and Challenges in the Design of Antibody Fragments with Therapeutic Potential.

Authors:  Sabrina Karim-Silva; Alessandra Becker-Finco; Isabella Gizzi Jiacomini; Fanny Boursin; Arnaud Leroy; Magali Noiray; Juliana de Moura; Nicolas Aubrey; Philippe Billiald; Larissa M Alvarenga
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 4.546

6.  Switching the substrate specificity of lysoplasmalogen-specific phospholipase D.

Authors:  Takayuki Oyama; Kazutaka Murayama; Daisuke Sugimori
Journal:  FEBS Open Bio       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 2.693

Review 7.  Pain-related toxins in scorpion and spider venoms: a face to face with ion channels.

Authors:  Sylvie Diochot
Journal:  J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis       Date:  2021-12-06

8.  The Role of Disulfide Bond Replacements in Analogues of the Tarantula Toxin ProTx-II and Their Effects on Inhibition of the Voltage-Gated Sodium Ion Channel Nav1.7.

Authors:  Zoë V F Wright; Stephen McCarthy; Rachael Dickman; Francis E Reyes; Silvia Sanchez-Martinez; Adam Cryar; Ian Kilford; Adrian Hall; Andrew K Takle; Maya Topf; Tamir Gonen; Konstantinos Thalassinos; Alethea B Tabor
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 9.  Forty Years of the Description of Brown Spider Venom Phospholipases-D.

Authors:  Luiza Helena Gremski; Hanna Câmara da Justa; Thaís Pereira da Silva; Nayanne Louise Costacurta Polli; Bruno César Antunes; João Carlos Minozzo; Ana Carolina Martins Wille; Andrea Senff-Ribeiro; Raghuvir Krishnaswamy Arni; Silvio Sanches Veiga
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 4.546

10.  Antigenic and Substrate Preference Differences between Scorpion and Spider Dermonecrotic Toxins, a Comparative Investigation.

Authors:  Ramla Ben Yekhlef; Liza Felicori; Lucianna Helene Santos; Camila F B Oliveira; Raoudha Fadhloun; Elham Torabi; Delavar Shahbazzadeh; Kamran Pooshang Bagheri; Rafaela Salgado Ferreira; Lamia Borchani
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 4.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.